Tomographic full waveform inversion (TFWI) by combining full waveform inversion with wave-equation migration velocity anaylisis

Author(s):  
Biondo Biondi ◽  
Ali Almomin
Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-42
Author(s):  
Guangchi Xing ◽  
Tieyuan Zhu

We formulate the Fréchet kernel computation using the adjoint-state method based on a fractional viscoacoustic wave equation. We first numerically prove that both the 1/2- and the 3/2-order fractional Laplacian operators are self-adjoint. Using this property, we show that the adjoint wave propagator preserves the dispersion and compensates the amplitude, while the time-reversed adjoint wave propagator behaves identically as the forward propagator with the same dispersion and dissipation characters. Without introducing rheological mechanisms, this formulation adopts an explicit Q parameterization, which avoids the implicit Q in the conventional viscoacoustic/viscoelastic full waveform inversion ( Q-FWI). In addition, because of the decoupling of operators in the wave equation, the viscoacoustic Fréchet kernel is separated into three distinct contributions with clear physical meanings: lossless propagation, dispersion, and dissipation. We find that the lossless propagation kernel dominates the velocity kernel, while the dissipation kernel dominates the attenuation kernel over the dispersion kernel. After validating the Fréchet kernels using the finite-difference method, we conduct a numerical example to demonstrate the capability of the kernels to characterize both velocity and attenuation anomalies. The kernels of different misfit measurements are presented to investigate their different sensitivities. Our results suggest that rather than the traveltime, the amplitude and the waveform kernels are more suitable to capture attenuation anomalies. These kernels lay the foundation for the multiparameter inversion with the fractional formulation, and the decoupled nature of them promotes our understanding of the significance of different physical processes in the Q-FWI.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathias Louboutin ◽  
Philipp Witte ◽  
Michael Lange ◽  
Navjot Kukreja ◽  
Fabio Luporini ◽  
...  

This is the second part of a three-part tutorial series on full-waveform inversion (FWI) in which we provide a step-by-step walk through of setting up forward and adjoint wave equation solvers and an optimization framework for inversion. In Part 1 ( Louboutin et al., 2017 ), we showed how to use Devito ( http://www.opesci.org/devito-public ) to set up and solve acoustic wave equations with (impulsive) seismic sources and sample wavefields at the receiver locations to forward model shot records. Here in Part 2, we will discuss how to set up and solve adjoint wave equations with Devito and, from that, how we can calculate gradients and function values of the FWI objective function.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio Alberto Abreo ◽  
Ana Beatríz Ramírez- Silva ◽  
Oscar Mauricio Reyes- Torres

The second order scattering information provided by the Hessian matrix and its inverse plays an important role in both, parametric inversion and uncertainty quantification. On the one hand, for parameter inversion, the Hessian guides the descent direction such that the cost function minimum is reached with less iterations. On the other hand, it provides a posteriori information of the probability distribution of the parameters obtained after full waveform inversion, as a function of the a priori probability distribution information. Nevertheless, the computational cost of the Hessian matrix represents the main obstacle in the state-of-the-art for practical use of this matrix from synthetic or real data. The second order adjoint state theory provides a strategy to compute the exact Hessian matrix, reducing its computational cost, because every column of the matrix can be obtained by performing two forward and two backward propagations. In this paper, we first describe an approach to compute the exact Hessian matrix for the acoustic wave equation with constant density. We then provide an analysis of the use of the Hessian matrix for uncertainty quantification of the full waveform inversion of the velocity model for a synthetic example, using the 2D acoustic and isotropic wave equation operator in time.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document