scholarly journals Commissioning mental health services: role of the consultant psychiatrist

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Simpson

The current National Health Service (NHS) approach to commissioning health services is in flux. The purchasing of care from providers by general practitioner fundholders (GPFHs) and health authorities has changed with the new White Papers. GPFHs no longer exist and the commissioning role is being handed over from health authorities to primary care groups (PCGs). An understanding of the reasons for change and current arrangements will aid the consultant psychiatrist in influencing this process.

2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tami Kramer ◽  
M. Elena Garralda

Epidemiological research has revealed that psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents are common, persistent and handicapping. Only 1 in 10 of those with a disorder is seen in specialist mental health services. However, the majority of children and adolescents see their general practitioner (GP) every year. Although the majority present with physical complaints, there are indications that rates of psychiatric disorder in those attending are increased and that psychiatric disorder is associated with increased consulting. These findings raise questions about the role of primary care in the promotion and management of mental health in young people.


1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 193-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Sims

This is a personal view on the implications for mental health services of the Executive Letter of the National Health Service Management Executive (NHSME), published in July 1992 (EL (92) 48): ‘Guidance on the extension of the Hospital and Community Health Services elements of the GP Fundholding Scheme from 1st April, 1993’.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek Tracy ◽  
Anna Forrest ◽  
Benjamin R. Underwood

Summary For several decades, mental health services within the UK's National Health Service were provided by specialist mental health trusts. More recently many of these trusts have integrated community physical health services into their operations. We describe here how two integrated mental health trusts in England were able to make an enhanced response to the COVID-19 pandemic.


1993 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 755-756
Author(s):  
Sally A. Foster ◽  
Philip S. Davison

Over recent years the National Health Service has undergone many changes, one of the most important being the development of purchaser/provider roles. From April 1993 district health authorities (DHAs) and general practitioner fund holders (GPFHs) have been able to choose from which provider to purchase their adult psychiatric out-patient services. While discussions on how to attract and keep the contracts from DHAs and GPFHs have been underway at a managerial and consultant level, we believe that the potential role of a key player for hospitals, the psychiatric medical secretary, has been overlooked. This paper examines the secretarial role in the context of the ‘new’ health service.


1968 ◽  
Vol 114 (509) ◽  
pp. 509-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Sutherland

To describe the role of the consultant psychotherapist in the mental health services, we must start from the situation in regard to psychotherapeutic needs in the community and the kinds of resources that can be mobilized to meet them. I should make it clear that when referring to consultant psychotherapists in the psychotherapeutic clinic I assume that optimally these specialists would be part of a comprehensive psychiatric service. For convenience I shall use the term “psychotherapeutic centre” to allow for the location of the psychotherapeutic services to vary according to circumstances in any one area. Also, although I shall speak often of the psychotherapist as though his was a rather separate contribution, I want to stress that this is partly a reflection of the present situation. Much of what I have to say about his role must become increasingly a part of the work of all psychiatrists.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 86 (6) ◽  
pp. 1032-1036
Author(s):  
Shirley Goodwin

Child health services in England and Wales are rendered largely through the National Health Service and Social Security. The activities of local authorities are also important to child health. The structure and scope of services offered children by each of these is presented and discussed, with special attention to changes anticipated during the next 2 years. The care of children is integrated into the system serving all ages, so that services are difficult to evaluate and resources are shared with other groups. Health policy for children is fragmentary, although encouraging trends are visible in the evolution of existing policy. The impact of impending changes in hospital, community, and general practitioner services on the care of children is unclear at this time.


1975 ◽  
Vol 13 (25) ◽  
pp. 99-100

Although most universities run a health service, students with important mental health problems are often seen by their general practitioner. There are a number of reasons for this; first, health services in the colleges of higher education outside universities are still patchy and incomplete. Second, students are on vacation for up to 24 weeks a year. Third, a student may choose to consult anyone, and may prefer someone unconnected with the university. Last, many students live at home and continue to see their general practitioner. This underlines the need for close liason between the general practitioner and student health services.


2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Dowrick

Following ground-breaking work by Shepherd et al (1966) and, more recently, Goldberg & Huxley (1992), primary care is now recognised as the arena in which most contact occurs between the National Health Service (NHS) and people with mental health problems. General practitioners (GPs) remain the first, and in many cases the only, health professionals involved in the management of a whole range of conditions, from common anxiety and depressive disorders to severe and enduring mental illnesses.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. 226
Author(s):  
Dilrukshi Abeysinghe

The objective of this paper is to examine the ethical responsibility conflicts between mental health authorities and social researchers. This issue is examined with reference to the social research protocols imposed by the authorities of mental health institutions based on ethical grounds. It also explores how such ethical conflicts affect social research, which provides convincing evidence for the enhancement of mental health services. This paper analyzes ethical reasoning conflicts between social researchers and mental health authorities in terms of the psychiatric and social approaches to mental health and distress. The study is based on eight research projects to be conducted at mental health institutions in Sri Lanka during the period 2014–2016 that were designed by two academic staff members, two postgraduates, and four undergraduates in the Department of Sociology at the University of Colombo. Data was collected from the eight researchers who designed the research projects and from four administrative officers, one officer from each of the concerned institutions where the projects were to be conducted. A structured interview method was used to collect the data. According to the findings, the protocols recommended by mental health authorities based on ethical grounds divest social researchers of their ethical responsibility to conduct research that could advance mental health services and assist mental health service users. The study reveals that such protocols deprive mental health service users of their right and autonomy to make decisions about divulging information, expressing views, and accessing meaningful social relationships and activities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document