Memory and witness testimony: what the psychiatrist cannot know
SUMMARYPsychiatrists called on to assess the reliability of witness testimony in the courts enter an arena fraught with uncertainties. This commentary discusses Commane & Kopelman's exploration of both the ‘normal’ fallibility of memory and disordered memory and considers the unavoidable limitations of their guidance on memory assessment and medico-legal work.
1989 ◽
Vol 5
(3)
◽
pp. 565-581
◽
1992 ◽
Vol 4
(1)
◽
pp. 45-68
◽
Keyword(s):
2019 ◽
Vol 9
(3)
◽
pp. 139-162