II. the Incidence of Compliance Problems, Side-effects, Neurotic Symptoms and Depression

1985 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. 469-474 ◽  

SummarySeven years after the completion of the original trial, over 73% of patients were maintained on depot neuroleptics, and 70% had received such medication for over seven years. About 40% had presented with a problem of compliance at some time, and there was a significant correlation between poor compliance and in-patient admissions and schizophrenic relapses. The prevalence of parkinsonian side-effects, akathisia, and tardive dyskinesia was low. Non-psychotic symptoms were common, even in the absence of acute psychosis. Depression was found in a subgroup of patients; it was frequently reported as an indication for admission during follow-up period, and seemed to be part of the schizophrenic illness rather than a result of antipsychotic drug treatment.

1994 ◽  
Vol 89 (s382) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fleischhacker WW ◽  
Meise U ◽  
Günther V ◽  
Kurz M

1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. R. E. Barnes ◽  
T. Kidger ◽  
S. M. Gore

SynopsisA prospective study of tardive dyskinesia was carried out to gain information regarding the natural history of the condition and to identify risk factors. Out of an original cohort of 182 psychiatric patients receiving maintenance antipsychotic drugs 99 were available for reassessment after 3 years. In this follow-up group the point prevalence of oro-facial dyskinesia increased from 39% to 47% over the 3-year period. Twenty-two patients developed the disorder, while remission occurred in 14 others. Risk factors predicting the presence of oro-facial dyskinesia at follow-up included being over 50 years of age and the presence of akathisia. There was no convincing association between the duration of antipsychotic drug treatment and the presence or severity of oro-facial dyskinesia. Patients receiving over 1000mg chlorpromazine equivalents of antipsychotic drug per day were unlikely to have the condition. The amount of purposeless trunk and limb movement present proved to be a relatively stable phenomenon, showing only a slight increase with age and no change over the follow-up period. The implications of these findings are discussed, with particular consideration being given to the effects of loss of patients to follow-up.


2011 ◽  
Vol 130 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 176-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vered Baloush-Kleinman ◽  
Stephen Z. Levine ◽  
David Roe ◽  
Dan Shnitt ◽  
Abraham Weizman ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S149-S150
Author(s):  
Petros Drosos ◽  
Erik Johnsen ◽  
Christoffer A Bartz-Johannessen ◽  
Rune A Kroken

Abstract Background Schizophrenia is a serious illness and treatment with antipsychotic drugs remains one of the most effective types of treatment. The course of schizophrenia, however, is highly heterogeneous and currently it is not possible to predict which patient will respond adequately to which antipsychotic drug. The aim of our study was to define trajectories regarding response to antipsychotic drug treatment in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. A second aim was to evaluate demographic factors and antipsychotic drugs as predictors for the different trajectories. Methods Best Intro is a randomized, rater-blind, head-to-head comparison of amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine. Adult patients with a diagnosis in the schizophrenia spectrum (ICD-10 diagnoses F20-29) were included. Participants had symptoms of ongoing psychosis as determined by a score of four or more on at least one of the following PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) items: P1 (delusions), P3 (hallucinations), P5 (grandiosity), P6 (suspiciousness/persecution) or G9 (unusual thought content). Patients were followed over a period of 52 weeks and the assessment points were at baseline, after one week, three weeks, six weeks, three months, six months, nine months, and 12 months. Totally 359 patients were assessed for eligibility, and 144 of them were enrolled and randomized to one of the study drugs. We used the R statistical program to define trajectories of antipsychotic response. Results We identified three different trajectories regarding the reduction of PANSS total score, with Bayesian information criterion (BIC) = 6157 (BIC for two groups=6164 and for four groups=6171). A large group of patients (N=106, 74%) showed a trajectory of good improvement in PANSS total score over the first 26 weeks of follow-up and maintained it after one year with a total of 35% reduction in PANSS total score (Good response group). A second group of patients (N=19, 13%) followed a trajectory of quick response (already at one week) and a large reduction of PANSS total score (Strong response group). After one year, the reduction of PANSS total score was 58%. There was a difference in the starting point for PANSS total score in these two groups with a higher value at baseline in the Strong response group, but the ending point was quite similar. A third group of patients (N= 19, 13%) followed a trajectory of poor improvement and a 9% reduction in PANSS total score over the studied period (Slight response group). The demographic variables age, sex, civil status and living alone, or drug naivety did not predict participants grouping in the various trajectories. Furthermore, we examined the predictive value of different antipsychotic drug treatment for the different trajectories with the “Intention to treat” method. There was a statistically significant difference in favor of amisulpride treatment for belonging to the Strong response group, while olanzapine strongly predicted the belonging to the Slight response group. There was no significant difference among the antipsychotic drugs regarding the Good response group. Discussion Most patients (74%) with a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis showed a good response during the one year follow-up and another 13% showed a remarkable strong improvement. That means that a total of 87% of patients had a satisfactory course of illness during the first year. Use of amisulpride predicts a better course compared to aripiprazole and olanzapine. This finding can be useful for clinicians when selecting antipsychotic drugs for their patients.


2009 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. CMT.S2175 ◽  
Author(s):  
René Ernst Nielsen ◽  
Jimmi Nielsen

The cornerstone in treatment of psychosis is antipsychotic drugs. Treatment options have increased over the years; newer antipsychotic drugs with a proposed increased efficacy regarding negative and cognitive symptoms, but also a shift in side-effects from neurological side-effects to metabolic side-effects have arisen as the new challenge. The basis of successful pharmacological treatment is a fundamental understanding of the mechanisms of action, the desired effects and side-effects of antipsychotic drugs, a good relationship with the patient and a thorough monitoring of the patient before and during treatment. The clinically relevant aspects of antipsychotic drug treatment are reviewed; mechanism of antipsychotic drug action, clinical considerations in treatment, switching antipsychotic drugs, polypharmacy, safety and patient preference.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document