scholarly journals Magnetic resonance imaging studies in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: meta-analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 195 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Arnone ◽  
J. Cavanagh ◽  
D. Gerber ◽  
S. M. Lawrie ◽  
K. P. Ebmeier ◽  
...  

BackgroundSeveral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have identified structural abnormalities in association with bipolar disorder. The literature is, however, heterogeneous and there is remaining uncertainty about which brain areas are pivotal to the pathogenesis of the condition.AimsTo identify, appraise and summarise volumetric MRI studies of brain regions comparing bipolar disorder with an unrelated control group and individuals with schizophrenia.MethodA systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis was carried out to identify key areas of structural abnormality in bipolar disorder and whether the pattern of affected areas separated bipolar disorder from schizophrenia. Significant heterogeneity was explored using meta-regression.ResultsParticipants with bipolar disorder are characterised by whole brain and prefrontal lobe volume reductions, and also by increases in the volume of the globus pallidus and lateral ventricles. In comparison with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder is associated with smaller lateral ventricular volume and enlarged amygdala volume. Heterogeneity was widespread and could be partly explained by clinical variables and year of publication, but generally not by differences in image acquisition.ConclusionsThere appear to be robust changes in brain volume in bipolar disorder compared with healthy volunteers, although most changes do not seem to be diagnostically specific. Age and duration of illness appear to be key issues in determining the magnitude of observed effect sizes.

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
D. Arnone ◽  
J. Cavanagh ◽  
D. Gerber ◽  
S.M. Lawrie ◽  
K.P. Ebmeier ◽  
...  

Introduction:Several MRI studies have identified structural abnormalities in association with bipolar disorder. The literature is however heterogeneous and there is remaining uncertainty about the brain areas pivotal to the pathogenesis of the condition. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise and summarise volumetric MRI studies of brain regions comparing bipolar disorder with an unrelated control group and/or patients with schizophrenia.Methods:A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis was carried out to identify key areas of structural abnormality in bipolar disorder and whether the pattern of affected areas separated bipolar disorder from schizophrenia. Excessive variability was explored using meta-regression analyses.Results:Seventy two reports met inclusion criteria. Subjects with bipolar disorder showed significant whole brain and prefrontal lobe volume reductions, and also increases in the volume of the globus pallidus. Enlargement of the lateral ventricles in bipolar disorder was confirmed, although the magnitude of enlargement was smaller than in schizophrenia. Subjects with schizophrenia, but not bipolar disorder, showed significant reductions in right amygdala volumes. Heterogeneity was statistically significant for many of the analyses and could amongst others be explained by age, duration of illness and year of publication.Conclusion:There appear to be robust changes in brain volume in bipolar disorder compared with healthy volunteers. Age and duration of illness appear to be key issues in determining the magnitude of observed effect sizes.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
D. Arnone ◽  
J. Cavanagh ◽  
D. Gerber ◽  
S.M. Lawrie ◽  
K.P. Ebmeier ◽  
...  

Introduction:Several MRI studies have identified structural abnormalities in association with bipolar disorder. The literature is however heterogeneous and there is remaining uncertainty about the brain areas pivotal to the pathogenesis of the condition. The aim of this study was to identify, appraise and summarise volumetric MRI studies of brain regions comparing bipolar disorder with an unrelated control group and/or patients with schizophrenia.Methods:A systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis was carried out to identify key areas of structural abnormality in bipolar disorder and whether the pattern of affected areas separated bipolar disorder from schizophrenia. Excessive variability was explored using meta-regression analyses.Results:Seventy two reports met inclusion criteria. Subjects with bipolar disorder showed significant whole brain and prefrontal lobe volume reductions, and also increases in the volume of the globus pallidus. Enlargement of the lateral ventricles in bipolar disorder was confirmed, although the magnitude of enlargement was smaller than in schizophrenia. Subjects with schizophrenia, but not bipolar disorder, showed significant reductions in right amygdala volumes. Heterogeneity was statistically significant for many of the analyses and could amongst others be explained by age, duration of illness and year of publication.Conclusion:There appear to be robust changes in brain volume in bipolar disorder compared with healthy volunteers. Age and duration of illness appear to be key issues in determining the magnitude of observed effect sizes.


2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 411-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colm McDonald ◽  
Jolanta Zanelli ◽  
Sophia Rabe-Hesketh ◽  
Ian Ellison-Wright ◽  
Pak Sham ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 70-70
Author(s):  
Xiang Tu ◽  
Zhenhua Liu ◽  
Shi Qiu ◽  
He Xu ◽  
Jiakun Li ◽  
...  

70 Background: Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (MRI/TRUS) fusion targeted biopsy (TB) has been demonstrated to increase detection rates (DRs) of prostate cancer (PCa) in repeat-biopsy setting. However, its role in biopsy-naïve men remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis based on well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRI/TRUS fusion TB and systematic biopsy (SB) in the detection of PCa in biopsy-naïve men. Methods: A systematic review of PubMed (Medline), Embase, Ovid and the Cochrane Library up to 1st October, 2018 was conducted. The statistical analyses were performed with Revman 5.3. We compared the diagnostic accuracy between the intervention group (assisted with fusion TB) and the control group (SB only) by calculating the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) DRs. Subgroup analysis was performed to highlight the independent role of MRI/TRUS fusion TB alone or combining fusion TB and SB together in the detection of PCa. Results: Six RCTs with 2187 participants were evaluated for the DRs of overall PCa. Pooled analysis revealed slight higher DRs of 62.7% (687/1095) in the intervention group compared with that of 41.3% (451/1092) in the control group (RR 1.40, 95% CI: 1.00-1.95). Four studies with 962 participants were evaluated for the DRs of csPCa. There is a trend favoring the intervention group which detected more csPCa (42.8%, 206/481) compared with SB in the control group (31.6%, 152/481) but with no significant difference (RR 1.36, 95% CI: 0.95-1.95). Subgroup analysis revealed fusion TB alone with less biopsy cores may equal the DRs of csPCa compared with SB alone (RR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.79-1.93). However, the DRs of overall PCa when combining MRI/TRUS fusion TB and SB was comparable to that applying SB alone (RR 1.48, 95% CI: 0.99-2.22). Conclusions: MRI/TRUS fusion TB may obtain similar csPCa DRs with less biopsy cores. But currently there was no enough evidence showing fusion TB can help significantly improve overall PCa or csPCa DRs compared with SB alone in biopsy-naïve men.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document