scholarly journals Partnership in Practice: a multidisciplinary approach to quality improvement in primary health care

1995 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 371-371
Author(s):  
Michael Phelan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Professional Groups ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Audit Team

This one day seminar was arranged by the King's Fund Organisational Audit team (KFOA), to take a multidisciplinary view of quality improvement in primary care. Despite the title of the day all the speakers were general practitioners and managers, and input from other professional groups was limited to questions and comments from the audience of nearly 200.

scholarly journals Improving Health Care Management in Primary Care for Homeless People: A Literature Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Jego ◽  
J Abcaya ◽  
C Calvet-montredon ◽  
S Gentile
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
General Population ◽  
Literature Review ◽  
Care Management ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Homeless People ◽  
Primary Health

Abstract Background Homeless people have poorer health status than the general population. They need complex care management, because of associated medical troubles (somatic and psychiatric) and social difficulties. However, they face multiple difficulties in accessing primary health care and receive less preventive health care than the general population. Methods We performed a literature review that included articles which described and evaluated primary care programs for homeless people. We searched into the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, COCHRANE library, and Cairn.info databases primary articles published between 1 January 2012 and 15 December 2016. We also performed a grey literature search, and we added relative articles as we read the references of the selected articles. We described the main characteristics of the primary care programs presented in the selected articles. Then we classified these characteristics in main categories, as a descriptive thematic analysis. Secondarily, we synthetized the main results about the evaluation of each intervention or organization. Results Most of the programs presented a team-based approach, multidisciplinary and/or integrated care. They often proposed co-located services between somatic health services, mental health services and social support services. They also tried to answer to the specific needs of homeless people. Some characteristics of these programs were associated with significant positive outcomes: tailored primary care organizations, clinic orientation, multidisciplinary team-based models which included primary care physicians and clinic nurses, integration of social support, and engagement in the community’s health. Conclusions Primary health care programs that aimed at taking care of the homeless people should emphasize a multidisciplinary approach and should consider an integrated (mental, somatic and social) care model. Key messages To improve the health care management of homeless people it seems necessary to priorize multidisciplinary approach, integrated care, involve community health and answer their specific needs. It is necessary to evaluate more non-tailored primary care programs that collaborate with tailored structures.

scholarly journals An implementation history of primary health care transformation: Alberta’s primary care networks and the people, time and culture of change

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Myles Leslie ◽  
Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani ◽  
Judy Birdsell ◽  
P. G. Forest ◽  
Rita Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Policy Documents ◽  
Incremental Change ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background Primary care, and its transformation into Primary Health Care (PHC), has become an area of intense policy interest around the world. As part of this trend Alberta, Canada, has implemented Primary Care Networks (PCNs). These are decentralized organizations, mandated with supporting the delivery of PHC, funded through capitation, and operating as partnerships between the province’s healthcare administration system and family physicians. This paper provides an implementation history of the PCNs, giving a detailed account of how people, time, and culture have interacted to implement bottom up, incremental change in a predominantly Fee-For-Service (FFS) environment. Methods Our implementation history is built out of an analysis of policy documents and qualitative interviews. We conducted an interpretive analysis of relevant policy documents (n = 20) published since the first PCN was established. We then grounded 12 semi-structured interviews in that initial policy analysis. These interviews explored 11 key stakeholders’ perceptions of PHC transformation in Alberta generally, and the formation and evolution of the PCNs specifically. The data from the policy review and the interviews were coded inductively, with participants checking our emerging analyses. Results Over time, the PCNs have shifted from an initial Frontier Era that emphasized local solutions to local problems and featured few rules, to a present Era of Accountability that features central demands for standardized measures, governance, and co-planning with other elements of the health system. Across both eras, the PCNs have been first and foremost instruments and supporters of family physician authority and autonomy. A core group of people emerged to create the PCNs and, over time, to develop a long-term Quality Improvement (QI) vision and governance plan for them as organizations. The continuing willingness of both these groups to work at understanding and aligning one another’s cultures to achieve the transformation towards PHC has been central to the PCNs’ survival and success. Conclusions Generalizable lessons from the implementation history of this emerging policy experiment include: The need for flexibility within a broad commitment to improving quality. The importance of time for individuals and organizations to learn about: quality improvement; one another’s cultures; and how best to support the transformation of a system while delivering care locally.

scholarly journals Potential access to primary health care: what does the National Program for Access and Quality Improvement data show?

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Severina Alice da Costa Uchôa ◽  
Ricardo Alexandre Arcêncio ◽  
Inês Fronteira ◽  
Ardigleusa Alves Coêlho ◽  
Claudia Santos Martiniano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
National Program ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Access And Quality

Objective: to analyze the influence of contextual indicators on the performance of cities regarding potential access to primary health care in Brazil and to discuss the contribution from nurses working on this access. Method: a multicenter descriptive study using secondary data from External Evaluation of the National Program for Access and Quality Improvement in Primary Care, with the participation of 17,202 primary care teams. The chi-square test of proportions was used to verify differences between the cities stratified in the dimensions on size of the coverage group, supply, coordination and integration. When necessary, the chi-square test with Yates correction or Fisher’s exact test were employed. For the population variable, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Results: the majority of participants were nurses (n = 15,876; 92.3%). Statistically significant differences were observed between the cities in terms of territory (p=0.0000), availability (p=0.0000), coordination of care (p=0.0000), integration (p=0.0000) and supply (p=0.0000), verifying that the cities that make up group 6 tend to perform better in these dimensions, with a better performance in all dimensions analyzed in groups 4, 5 and 6. Conclusion: weakness in smaller cities, confirming inequities in the potential access to Primary Health Care in Brazil as challenges for universal coverage. The preponderant role of nurses for its achievement is highlighted.

scholarly journals An Implementation History of Primary Health Care Transformation: Alberta’s Primary Care Networks and the People, Time and Culture of change

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myles Leslie ◽  
Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani ◽  
Judy Birdsell ◽  
PG Forest ◽  
Rita Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Policy Documents ◽  
Incremental Change ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background: Primary care, and its transformation into Primary Health Care (PHC), has become an area of intense policy interest around the world. As part of this trend Alberta, Canada, has implemented Primary Care Networks (PCNs). These are decentralized organizations, mandated with supporting the delivery of PHC, funded through capitation, and operating as partnerships between the province’s healthcare administration system and family physicians. This paper provides an implementationhistory of the PCNs, giving a detailed account of how people, time, and culture have interacted to implement bottom up, incremental change in a predominantly Fee-For-Service (FFS) environment.Methods: Our implementation history is built out of an analysis of policy documents and qualitative interviews. We conducted an interpretive analysis of relevant policy documents (n=20) published since the first PCN was established. We then grounded 12 semi-structured interviews in that initial policy analysis. These interviews explored 11 key stakeholders’ perceptions of PHC transformation in Alberta generally, and the formation and evolution of the PCNs specifically. The data from the policy review and the interviews were coded inductively, with participants checking our emerging analyses.Results: Over time, the PCNs have shifted from an initial Frontier Era that emphasized local solutions to local problems and featured few rules, to a present Era of Accountability that features central demands for standardized measures, governance, and co-planning with other elements of the health system. Across both eras, the PCNs have been first and foremost instruments and supporters of family physician authority and autonomy. A core group of people emerged to create the PCNs and, over time, to develop a long-term Quality Improvement (QI) vision and governance plan for them as organizations. The continuing willingness of both these groups to work at understanding and aligning one another’s cultures to achieve the transformation towards PHC has been central to the PCNs’ survival and success.Conclusions: Generalizable lessons from the implementation history of this emerging policy experiment include: The need for flexibility within a broad commitment to improving quality. The importance of time for individuals and organizations to learn about: quality improvement; one another’s cultures; and how best to support the transformation of a system while delivering care locally.

scholarly journals An implementation history of primary health care transformation: Alberta’s primary care networks and the people, time and culture of change

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myles Leslie ◽  
Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani ◽  
Judy Birdsell ◽  
PG Forest ◽  
Rita Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Policy Documents ◽  
Incremental Change ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background: Primary care, and its transformation into Primary Health Care (PHC), has become an area of intense policy interest around the world. As part of this trend Alberta, Canada, has implemented Primary Care Networks (PCNs). These are decentralized organizations, mandated with supporting the delivery of PHC, funded through capitation, and operating as partnerships between the province’s healthcare administration system and family physicians. This paper provides an implementationhistory of the PCNs, giving a detailed account of how people, time, and culture have interacted to implement bottom up, incremental change in a predominantly Fee-For-Service (FFS) environment.Methods: Our implementation history is built out of an analysis of policy documents and qualitative interviews. We conducted an interpretive analysis of relevant policy documents (n=20) published since the first PCN was established. We then grounded 12 semi-structured interviews in that initial policy analysis. These interviews explored 11 key stakeholders’ perceptions of PHC transformation in Alberta generally, and the formation and evolution of the PCNs specifically. The data from the policy review and the interviews were coded inductively, with participants checking our emerging analyses.Results: Over time, the PCNs have shifted from an initial Frontier Era that emphasized local solutions to local problems and featured few rules, to a present Era of Accountability that features central demands for standardized measures, governance, and co-planning with other elements of the health system. Across both eras, the PCNs have been first and foremost instruments and supporters of family physician authority and autonomy. A core group of people emerged to create the PCNs and, over time, to develop a long-term Quality Improvement (QI) vision and governance plan for them as organizations. The continuing willingness of both these groups to work at understanding and aligning one another’s cultures to achieve the transformation towards PHC has been central to the PCNs’ survival and success.Conclusions: Generalizable lessons from the implementation history of this emerging policy experiment include: The need for flexibility within a broad commitment to improving quality. The importance of time for individuals and organizations to learn about: quality improvement; one another’s cultures; and how best to support the transformation of a system while delivering care locally.

scholarly journals Exploration of funding models to support hybridisation of Australian primary health care organisations

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandeep Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Continuous Quality Improvement ◽  
Continuous Quality ◽  
Funding Model ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Set Up

ABSTRACT Primary Health Care (PHC) funding in Australia is complex and fragmented. The focus of PHC funding in Australia has been on volume rather than comprehensive primary care and continuous quality improvement. As PHC in Australia is increasingly delivered by hybrid style organisations, an appropriate funding model that matches this set-up while addressing current issues with PHC funding is required. This article discusses and proposes an appropriate funding model for hybrid PHC organisations.

scholarly journals An Implementation History of Primary Health Care Transformation: Alberta’s Primary Care Networks and the People, Time and Culture of change

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myles Leslie ◽  
Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani ◽  
Judy Birdsell ◽  
PG Forest ◽  
Rita Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Incremental Change ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background: Primary care, and its transformation into Primary Health Care (PHC), hasbecome an area of intense policy interest around the world. As part of this trendAlberta, Canada, has implemented Primary Care Networks (PCNs). These aredecentralized organizations, mandated with supporting the delivery of PHC, fundedthrough capitation, and operating as partnerships between the province’s healthcareadministration system and family physicians. This paper provides an implementationhistory of the PCNs, giving a detailed account of how people, time, and culturehave interacted to implement bottom up, incremental change in a predominantly Fee-For-Service (FFS) environment.Methods: Our implementation history is built out of an analysis of policy documentsand qualitative interviews. We conducted an interpretive analysis of relevant policydocuments (n=20) published since the first PCN was established. We then grounded12 semi-structured interviews in that initial policy analysis. These interviews explored11 key stakeholders’ perceptions of PHC transformation in Alberta generally, and theformation and evolution of the PCNs specifically. The data from the policy review andthe interviews were coded inductively, with participants checking our emerginganalyses.Results: Over time, the PCNs have shifted from an initial Frontier Era thatemphasized local solutions to local problems and featured few rules, to a present Eraof Accountability that features central demands for standardized measures,governance, and co-planning with other elements of the health system. A core groupof people – clinician and administration leaders – emerged to create the PCNs and,over time , to develop a long-term Quality Improvement (QI) vision and governanceplan for them as organizations. The continuing willingness of both these groups towork at understanding and aligning one another’s cultures to achieve thetransformation towards PHC has been central to the PCNs’ survival and success.Conclusions: Generalizable lessons from the implementation history of this emergingpolicy experiment include: The need for flexibility within a broad commitment toimproving quality. The importance of time for individuals and organizations to learnabout: quality improvement; one another’s cultures; and how best to support thetransformation of a system while delivering care locally.

scholarly journals Analysis of General Practitioners’ Attitudes and Beliefs about Psychological Intervention and the Medicine–Psychology Relationship in Primary Care: Toward a New Comprehensive Approach to Primary Health Care

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 613
Author(s):  
Attà Negri ◽  
Claudia Zamin ◽  
Giulia Parisi ◽  
Anna Paladino ◽  
Giovanbattista Andreoli
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Psychological Intervention ◽  
World Health ◽  
Attitudes And Beliefs ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Comprehensive Primary Health Care

The biopsychosocial paradigm is a model of care that has been proposed in order to improve the effectiveness of health care by promoting collaboration between different professions and disciplines. However, its application still faces several issues. A quantitative–qualitative survey was conducted on a sample of general practitioners (GPs) from Milan, Italy, to investigate their attitudes and beliefs regarding the role of the psychologist, the approach adopted to manage psychological diseases, and their experiences of collaboration with psychologists. The results show a partial view of the psychologist’s profession that limits the potential of integration between medicine and psychology in primary care. GPs recognized that many patients (66%) would often benefit from psychological intervention, but only in a few cases (9%) were these patients regularly referred to a psychologist. Furthermore, the referral represents an almost exclusive form of collaboration present in the opinions of GPs. Only 8% of GPs would consider the joint and integrated work of the psychologist and doctor useful within the primary health care setting. This vision of the role of psychologists among GPs represents a constraint in implementing a comprehensive primary health care approach, as advocated by the World Health Organization.

scholarly journals An Implementation History of Primary Health Care Transformation: Alberta’s Primary Care Networks and the People, Time and Culture of change

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myles Leslie ◽  
Akram Khayatzadeh-Mahani ◽  
Judy Birdsell ◽  
PG Forest ◽  
Rita Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Fee For Service ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Incremental Change ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
History Of ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background: Primary care, and its transformation into Primary Health Care (PHC), hasbecome an area of intense policy interest around the world. As part of this trendAlberta, Canada, has implemented Primary Care Networks (PCNs). These aredecentralized organizations, mandated with supporting the delivery of PHC, fundedthrough capitation, and operating as partnerships between the province’s healthcareadministration system and family physicians. This paper provides an implementationhistory of the PCNs, giving a detailed account of how people, time, and culturehave interacted to implement bottom up, incremental change in a predominantly Fee-For-Service (FFS) environment.Methods: Our implementation history is built out of an analysis of policy documentsand qualitative interviews. We conducted an interpretive analysis of relevant policydocuments (n=20) published since the first PCN was established. We then grounded12 semi-structured interviews in that initial policy analysis. These interviews explored11 key stakeholders’ perceptions of PHC transformation in Alberta generally, and theformation and evolution of the PCNs specifically. The data from the policy review andthe interviews were coded inductively, with participants checking our emerginganalyses. Results: Over time, the PCNs have shifted from an initial Frontier Era thatemphasized local solutions to local problems and featured few rules, to a present Eraof Accountability that features central demands for standardized measures,governance, and co-planning with other elements of the health system. A core groupof people – clinician and administration leaders – emerged to create the PCNs and,over time , to develop a long-term Quality Improvement (QI) vision and governanceplan for them as organizations. The continuing willingness of both these groups towork at understanding and aligning one another’s cultures to achieve thetransformation towards PHC has been central to the PCNs’ survival and success.Conclusions: Generalizable lessons from the implementation history of this emergingpolicy experiment include: The need for flexibility within a broad commitment toimproving quality. The importance of time for individuals and organizations to learnabout: quality improvement; one another’s cultures; and how best to support thetransformation of a system while delivering care locally.

Forecasting of labor resources in the system of primary health care in Kazakhstan

2020 ◽  
pp. 71-80
Author(s):  
A.D. Kharin ◽  
◽  
I.M. Son ◽  
B.K. Koichubekov ◽  
B.K. Omarkulov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Logic Program ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Labor Resources

Primary health care is a highly effective and efficient way to tackle the root causes and risks of poor health status, and to address emerging problems that threaten future health and well-being. Goal: Develop a model for predicting the need for general practitioners (GPs) until 2030, taking into account various input data in the equations describing the movement of labor resources in the form of “flows” and “ stocks “ using the method of system dynamics. Methods: The model was built using the Any Logic program, based on information about the availability of primary health care doctors, demographic data and the general prevalence of diseases in the population. Three scenarios were considered to predict the need for general practitioners. The base year was 2018, the forecast was carried out until 2030. Results: All of three scenarios indicate that with the current number of graduated GPs, the shortage of primary care physicians will be exacerbated. In general, the shortage can reach more than two thousand. Conclusion: Government and medical universities need to take measures to correct the number of students in the specialty of “General Practitioner” in order to avoid a growing shortage of primary care physicians in the future until 2030.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document