scholarly journals Mental Illness in Primary Care Settings

1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Social Security ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Research Unit ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Primary Care Settings

A Conference on the above topic took place at the Institute of Psychiatry, London, on 17 and 18 July 1984. The Conference was sponsored by the Department of Health and Social Security and was organized by the General Practice Research Unit. Over 100 invited clinicians, research workers and policy-makers took part. The majority of the participants were either psychiatrists or general practitioners, but representatives of all relevant disciplines attended.

scholarly journals Forthcoming Events

1984 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 59-60
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Treatment Effectiveness ◽  
Research Unit ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Future Trends ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Research And Policy

The Department of Health and Social Security is sponsoring a conference on ‘Mental Illness in Primary Care Settings’ which will be held at the Institute of Psychiatry on 17 and 18 July 1984. The conference is being organized by the General Practice Research Unit. Topics will include classification, screening, treatment effectiveness, patterns of collaboration, international developments and future trends for research and policy. Although attendance will be by invitation only, limited places may be available. Those interested should contact Dr D. G. Wilkinson, General Practice Research Unit, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ, from whom further information is available.

scholarly journals Participating in primary care

1989 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 135-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. K. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Clinical Problem ◽  
Research Unit ◽  
Health Care Team ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Junior Staff ◽  
Similar Survey

Traditionally, general practitioners and psychiatrists relate to one another through a system of cross referrals, from primary care to secondary care and back again, the referral being initiated by the GP through a request for a domiciliary visit or more usually for an out-patient assessment of the clinical problem. However, in the mid-1960s, individual psychiatrists began to report a new way of working, which consisted of the psychiatrist going by invitation into GPs' surgeries or health centres to work directly with the general practitioners and with other members of the primary health care team. A survey undertaken by Strathdee & Williams of the General Practice Research Unit of the Institute of Psychiatry, showed that by 1984 in England and Wales, one psychiatric consultant in five, sometimes with, sometimes without, junior staff, spent some time in a general practice setting. At the College meeting in Cambridge (April 1988), Pullen reported that in Scotland a similar survey showed that as many as 40 to 50% of psychiatric consultants spent some time in primary care settings.

The General Practice Research Unit at the Institute of Psychiatry

1989 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 787-790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Social Security ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Research Unit ◽  
Mental Health Research ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Research Fund ◽  
Social Scientists ◽  
Department Of Health

The General Practice Research Unit (GPRU) was established at the Institute of Psychiatry in the late 1950s, under the honorary directorship of Professor Michael Shepherd. For 30 years it has been staffed by medically qualified workers and social scientists supported, at various times, by the Nuffield Foundation, the Mental Health Research Fund, and the Department of Health and Social Security, as well as by university monies.

Paediatric emergency department referrals from primary care

2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (6) ◽  
pp. 691
Author(s):  
Erin Turbitt ◽  
Gary Lee Freed
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
General Practice ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Absolute Number ◽  
Patterns Of Care ◽  
Or Education ◽  
Policy Makers ◽  
Number Of Children

Background Over the last decade, paediatric referrals from general practitioners (GPs) to the emergency department (ED) have increased by 60% in Australia. Objective To investigate the characteristics of Victorian children referred by GPs to the ED with lower-urgency conditions. Method Data were collected from four hospital EDs in Victoria, May–November 2014. Parents attending the ED with their child triaged as lower urgency were surveyed. Descriptive, frequency, and bivariate analyses were performed. Results Of the 1150 responses, 28% (320) visited their GP before attending ED. Of these 66% (212), were referred by their GP. A greater proportion with injury than illness (84% vs 59%; P < 0.0001) was referred to the ED if they had first visited their GP. Conclusion Motivations of GPs to send lower-urgency injured and ill children to ED are not well understood. The high number of referrals from GPs to the ED for lower urgency conditions suggests attention by policy makers and health professionals must be paid to the current patterns of care of children in general practice. What is known about the topic? Paediatric referrals in Australia from GPs to EDs have increased in the last decade, along with the absolute number of children in Victoria presenting to the ED. What does this paper add? A significant number of children (66%) who attend the GP before visiting the ED are referred to the ED for their lower urgency condition. What are the implications for practitioners? It may be appropriate for GPs to be further supported to manage lower urgency conditions, through better resources or education.

Recognition of and Response to Dementia Syndrome in Primary Care: Part 1

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 230-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steve Iliffe ◽  
Priya Jain ◽  
Jane Wilcock
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Cognitive Function ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Function Tests ◽  
Dementia Syndrome

The theme of this article is the recognition of and response to dementia in general practice. Its aim is to clarify the tasks of diagnosing dementia, to advise on the use of cognitive function tests, to suggest ways of establishing the subtype of dementia where possible and to assist general practitioners in talking about dementia with their patients and their families.

Mental Health Research in General Practice

2005 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harry Minas ◽  
Steven Klimidis ◽  
Renata Kokanovic
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
General Practice ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Mental Health Research ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Practice Setting ◽  
Key Issues ◽  
Practice Time ◽  
Time Limitations

Objective: To explore problems in carrying out a mental health research project in the general practice setting. Method: Open-ended interviews were conducted with general practice stakeholders, focusing on impediments to the conduct of mental health research in general practice and possible means for improving the participation of general practitioners in such research. Participants in the consultations were members of ?ve divisions of general practice, senior staff within an academic department of general practice, four general practitioners and a research group engaged with general practice research. The discussions were recorded in detailed interview notes, and key issues and themes emerging from consultations were derived by the researchers. Results: Three main themes summarized most of the issues reported through the consultations, including structural issues (e.g. disruption of practice, time limitations and lack of remuneration), process issues (e.g. researcher–general practice communication, researcher-imposed issues and need for partnerships) and content issues (e.g. study design, study procedures and methods). Conclusions: The consultations revealed similar ?ndings to previously published reports concerning general practice research, with an emphasis on the need for partnerships between researchers and general practice organizations in the conduct of such research.

Evaluation of a brief psychological treatment for emotional disorders in primary care

1991 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 1013-1018 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Catalan ◽  
D. H. Gath ◽  
P. Anastasiades ◽  
S. A. K. Bond ◽  
A. Day ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Emotional Disorders ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Psychological Treatment ◽  
Recent Onset

SYNOPSISA randomized trial in general practice compared: (i) a brief psychological treatment (problem-solving) given by a psychiatrist; (ii) any treatment of the GP's choice, whether psychological or pharmacological. The patients had recent onset emotional disorders of poor prognosis. Patients in the problem-solving group showed significantly greater reductions in symptoms. Problem-solving as given by a psychiatrist was feasible in primary care and acceptable to patients. Problem-solving is now being evaluated as given by general practitioners trained in the method.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document