scholarly journals Mental health law in New Zealand

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Soosay ◽  
Rob Kydd
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Modern State ◽  
Compulsory Treatment ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
History Of ◽  
Constitutional Protections ◽  
Health Legislation

New Zealand has an established history of mental health legislation that sits within a framework of human rights, disability and constitutional protections. We outline a brief history of mental health legislation in New Zealand since its inception as a modern state in 1840. The current legislation, the Mental Health (Compulsory Assessment and Treatment) Act 1992, defines mental disorder and the threshold for compulsory treatment. We describe its use in clinical practice and the wider legal and constitutional context which psychiatrists need to be aware of in their relationships with patients.

scholarly journals Mental health law in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 63-65
Author(s):  
Antoni Novotni ◽  
Nensi Manusheva ◽  
Gabriela Novotni
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Mental Health Disorders ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Republic Of Macedonia ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Assessment And Treatment ◽  
Yugoslav Republic ◽  
Health Disorders ◽  
Health Legislation

Psychiatrists are often confronted with the problem of non-consensual treatment. This paper focuses on the rights of patients with mental health disorders in the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia in relation to non-consensual treatment and deprivation of liberty. The current mental health legislation and its implementation in local services is described with an emphasis on the assessment and treatment of patients with mental disorders.

scholarly journals Compulsory admission and involuntary treatment in Portugal

2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Telma Almeida ◽  
Andrew Molodynski
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Compulsory Treatment ◽  
Compulsory Admission ◽  
Involuntary Treatment ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Health Legislation

This paper details the grounds for compulsory treatment, compulsory admissions in an emergency department and compulsory out-patient treatment in Portugal. Portuguese mental health legislation has improved significantly over recent years, with enhanced safeguards, rapid and rigorous review and clear criteria for compulsory treatment, although much remains to be done, especially in relation to the ‘move into the community’.

scholarly journals The application of mental health legislation in younger children

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 302-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Thomas ◽  
Barry Chipchase ◽  
Lisa Rippon ◽  
Paul McArdle
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Young Child ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Authority ◽  
Challenging Behaviour ◽  
Health Unit ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
History Of ◽  
Health Legislation ◽  
Mental Health Unit

SummaryWe review a case history of a young child who was admitted to an in-patient mental health unit due to extremely challenging behaviour and review the legal issues that had to be considered in ensuring that there was appropriate legal authority for the child's admission and treatment. In this particular case, the patient was detained for assessment under section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983. This case demonstrates that all clinicians working in this area require a good understanding of the law in relation to treatment of children with mental disorder, which is extremely complex.

scholarly journals Involuntary community treatment in New South Wales, Australia

1995 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Hambridge ◽  
Nicola Watt
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mentally Ill ◽  
New South ◽  
New South Wales ◽  
Community Treatment ◽  
Compulsory Treatment ◽  
Perceived Benefits ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Health Legislation

The New South Wales Mental Health Act (1990) heralded a number of important changes to mental health legislation in the state. One of these was the option to give compulsory treatment to mentally ill clients living in the community. This article briefly explains community treatment under the Act, and the perceived benefits and the limitations of such legislation. A case example is used to illustrate some of these points. Involuntary community treatment is seen as a less restrictive alternative to hospitalisation for a number of mentally ill clients, but the use of such provisions demands significant resources from the supervising agency.

scholarly journals Services for adults with intellectual disability in Aotearoa New Zealand

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (03) ◽  
pp. 71-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane McCarthy ◽  
Mhairi Duff
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Aotearoa New Zealand ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Health Professional Training ◽  
Training Schemes ◽  
Health Legislation

Aotearoa New Zealand is a country of just under 5 million people with a diverse population, the main ethnic groups being of European descent and Maori. There are well-developed public and private healthcare systems. As in other countries, Aotearoa New Zealand has closed the large institutions and developed community-based services for people with intellectual disability. Aotearoa New Zealand has specific legislation for people with intellectual disability presenting to the criminal justice system and has unusually and explicitly excluded people with intellectual disability from mental health legislation since 1992. Partly as a result, most health professional training schemes have little focus on issues for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Therefore, one of the main challenges over the coming decade will be to ensure there is a sufficient workforce of psychiatrists and other professionals who have the training and expertise to work with people with intellectual disability requiring mental health and forensic services.

scholarly journals Mental health law reforms in Uganda: lessons learnt

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Ssebunnya ◽  
Sheila Ndyanabangi ◽  
Fred Kigozi
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Mental Health Law ◽  
Work In Progress ◽  
Lessons Learnt ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Health Legislation

Ugandan mental health legislation, which dates from 1964, principally aims to remove persons with mental disorders from the community but also to protect their safety, by keeping them in confinement, although this has been without consideration for clinical care. In response to criticism from various stakeholders and advocates and the need to reflect modern clinical care, Uganda undertook to review and amend the mental health legislation, as part of the Mental Health and Poverty Project (MHaPP). We report on work in progress advancing new legislation.

scholarly journals Mental health legislation in Egypt

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 64-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nasser Loza ◽  
Mohamed El Nawawi
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Psychiatric Services ◽  
Code Of Practice ◽  
Mental Health Act ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
History Of ◽  
Health Legislation

This paper first briefly reviews the history of psychiatric services in Egypt. It then details the legislation in place during the last years of the Mubarak regime and goes on to set out recent developments, in particular the Code of Practice introduced for the Mental Health Act of 2009.

scholarly journals Black robes and white coats: who will win the new mental health tribunals?

2005 ◽  
Vol 186 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer P. Sarkar ◽  
Gwen Adshead
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Twilight Zone ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Medical Evidence ◽  
Criminal Courts ◽  
American Experience ◽  
Mental Health Legislation ◽  
New Type ◽  
Health Legislation

Under current proposals for new mental health legislation, psychiatrists increasingly will be involved in tribunal processes examining the grounds for compulsory detention and treatment, both in hospitals and in the community. They will lose some authority over admission and discharge, with decision-making instead being given over to legal bodies that will regulate admission and discharge. The proposals for wholesale change in UK mental health law are an opportunity to devise a new type of legal hearing where all ‘sides' are properly represented. However, the new mental health tribunals proposed in the draft UK bill sit in a twilight zone of ‘quasi-criminal’ courts. The use of single joint experts or ‘expert panels', consistent with the recent civil law reforms, means that problems of undisputed medical evidence may become even more acute. American experience shows that judicial deference to clinical opinion, even in overtly adversarial commitment hearings, is considerable (Bursztajn et al, 1997). In this editorial, we argue that these proposals justify a re-examination of the values of law and psychiatry.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document