Assessment of Continuous Span Bridges through Nonlinear Static Procedures

2009 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Pinho ◽  
Ricardo Monteiro ◽  
Chiara Casarotti ◽  
Raimundo Delgado

Nonlinear static procedures constitute an important tool in design office application of performance-based earthquake engineering concepts, and for this reason, they have been extensively developed and promoted in the last decade or so. However, these efforts focused predominantly on the assessment of buildings, rather than bridges, and hence there is currently a need to verify the validity in the application of such pushover-based methods for the assessment of bridges or viaducts. In this work, therefore, by considering a wide set of bridge configurations subjected to equally varying seismic input intensity levels, four commonly employed nonlinear static procedures (CSM, N2, MPA, ACSM) are scrutinized and compared, with a view to establish their adequacy for the seismic assessment of existing continuous span bridges. Results seem to indicate that all methods are able to predict displacement response with good accuracy, while force estimation, on the other hand, is reasonably attained only by those approaches where higher modes effects are explicitly accounted for.

2014 ◽  
Vol 580-583 ◽  
pp. 1581-1590 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdelouafi el Ghoulbzouri ◽  
Zakaria el Alami ◽  
Sabrine el Hannoudi

The performance-based engineering approach, as opposed to prescriptive rules of code-based design, is based on simulation of real structural behavior. Reliability of the expected performance state is assessed by using various methodologies based on finite element nonlinear static pushover analysis and specialized reliability software package. Reliability approaches that were considered included full coupling with an external finite element code based methods in conjunction with either first order reliability method or importance sampling method. The building considered in the actual study has been designed against seismic hazard according to the Moroccan code RPS2000.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 1744-1756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Deng ◽  
Shiling Pei ◽  
John W. van de Lindt ◽  
Hongyan Liu ◽  
Chao Zhang

Inclusion of ground motion–induced uncertainty in structural response evaluation is an essential component for performance-based earthquake engineering. In current practice, ground motion uncertainty is often represented in performance-based earthquake engineering analysis empirically through the use of one or more ground motion suites. How to quantitatively characterize ground motion–induced structural response uncertainty propagation at different seismic hazard levels has not been thoroughly studied to date. In this study, a procedure to quantify the influence of ground motion uncertainty on elastoplastic single-degree-of-freedom acceleration responses in an incremental dynamic analysis is proposed. By modeling the shape of the incremental dynamic analysis curves, the formula to calculate uncertainty in maximum acceleration responses of linear systems and elastoplastic single-degree-of-freedom systems is constructed. This closed-form calculation provided a quantitative way to establish statistical equivalency for different ground motion suites with regard to acceleration response in these simple systems. This equivalence was validated through a numerical experiment, in which an equivalent ground motion suite for an existing ground motion suite was constructed and shown to yield statistically similar acceleration responses to that of the existing ground motion suite at all intensity levels.


2019 ◽  
Vol 213 ◽  
pp. 51-71 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefania Degli Abbati ◽  
Antonio Maria D'Altri ◽  
Daria Ottonelli ◽  
Giovanni Castellazzi ◽  
Serena Cattari ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document