Lung Cancer Screening With Low-Dose CT: Implementation Amid Changing Public Policy at One Health Care System

Author(s):  
Abbie Begnaud ◽  
Thomas Hall ◽  
Tadashi Allen

Screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT has evolved rapidly in recent years since the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) results. Subsequent professional and governmental organization guidelines have shaped policy and reimbursement for the service. Increasingly available guidance describes eligible patients and components necessary for a high-quality lung cancer screening program; however, practical instruction and implementation experience is not widely reported. We launched a lung cancer screening program in the face of reimbursement and guideline uncertainties at a large academic health center. We report our experience with implementation, including challenges and proposed solutions. Initially, we saw less referrals than expected for screening, and many patients referred for screening did not clearly meet eligibility guidelines. We educated primary care providers and implemented system tools to encourage referral of eligible patients. Moreover, in response to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) final coverage determination, we report our programmatic adaptation to meet these requirements. In addition to the components common to all quality programs, individual health delivery systems will face unique barriers related to patient population, available resources, and referral patterns.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 501-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ann O’Brien ◽  
Diego Llovet ◽  
Frank Sullivan ◽  
Lawrence Paszat

Abstract Background The National Lung Screening Trial demonstrated that screening with low-dose computed tomography significantly reduces mortality from lung cancer in high-risk individuals. Objective To describe the role preferences and information needs of primary care providers (PCPs) in a future organized lung cancer screening program. Methods We purposively sampled PCPs from diverse health regions of Ontario and from different practice models including family health teams and community health centres. We also recruited family physicians with a leadership role in cancer screening. We used focus groups and a nominal group process to identify informational priorities. Two analysts systematically applied a coding scheme to interview transcripts. Results Four groups were held with 34 providers and administrative staff [28 (82%) female, 21 (62%) physicians, 7 (20%) other health professionals and 6 (18%) administrative staff]. PCPs and staff were generally positive about a potential lung cancer screening program but had variable views on their involvement. Informational needs included evidence of potential benefits and harms of screening. Most providers preferred that a new program be modelled on positive features of an existing breast cancer screening program. Lung cancer screening was viewed as a new opportunity to counsel patients about smoking cessation. Conclusions The development of a future lung cancer screening program should consider the wide variability in the roles that PCPs preferred. An explicit link to existing smoking cessation programs was seen as essential. As providers had significant information needs, learning materials and opportunities should be developed with them.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 586-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brady J. McKee ◽  
Andrea B. McKee ◽  
Sebastian Flacke ◽  
Carla R. Lamb ◽  
Paul J. Hesketh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S1012-S1013
Author(s):  
K. Domvri ◽  
T. Kontakiotis ◽  
G. Lazaridis ◽  
D. Spyratos ◽  
E. Eleftheriadou ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Simona Cioaia ◽  
Carlos Tornero ◽  
Eugenio Sanchez ◽  
Mariajose Alos

We describe the care burden derived from a lung cancer screening program in high-risk patients with HIV. In a well-selected group with the described criteria, one annual low-dose thoracic computed tomographic exploration can be applied to 7.2% of the patients attended (95% confidence interval: 4.2-9.6), with at least one follow-up exploration in another 1.3%, with the generation of at least 2 extra visits for explanation of the protocol and results. If smoking habit does not change over the next 2 years, another 4.3% of the patients will have met the inclusion criteria. Early detection of lung cancer with low-dose thoracic computed tomographic could be of interest in HIV-infected patients because of the increased of risk but would imply an increase in care burden that must be taken into account.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document