Analysis of Low Dose CT Scans for Lung Cancer Screening Outside a Formal Lung Cancer Screening Program

Author(s):  
R. Hamed ◽  
J. Chong ◽  
K. Sayegh ◽  
P.N. Patiño Garzón ◽  
J.L. Taylor ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 586-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brady J. McKee ◽  
Andrea B. McKee ◽  
Sebastian Flacke ◽  
Carla R. Lamb ◽  
Paul J. Hesketh ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S1012-S1013
Author(s):  
K. Domvri ◽  
T. Kontakiotis ◽  
G. Lazaridis ◽  
D. Spyratos ◽  
E. Eleftheriadou ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Abbie Begnaud ◽  
Thomas Hall ◽  
Tadashi Allen

Screening for lung cancer with low-dose CT has evolved rapidly in recent years since the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) results. Subsequent professional and governmental organization guidelines have shaped policy and reimbursement for the service. Increasingly available guidance describes eligible patients and components necessary for a high-quality lung cancer screening program; however, practical instruction and implementation experience is not widely reported. We launched a lung cancer screening program in the face of reimbursement and guideline uncertainties at a large academic health center. We report our experience with implementation, including challenges and proposed solutions. Initially, we saw less referrals than expected for screening, and many patients referred for screening did not clearly meet eligibility guidelines. We educated primary care providers and implemented system tools to encourage referral of eligible patients. Moreover, in response to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) final coverage determination, we report our programmatic adaptation to meet these requirements. In addition to the components common to all quality programs, individual health delivery systems will face unique barriers related to patient population, available resources, and referral patterns.


Author(s):  
Simona Cioaia ◽  
Carlos Tornero ◽  
Eugenio Sanchez ◽  
Mariajose Alos

We describe the care burden derived from a lung cancer screening program in high-risk patients with HIV. In a well-selected group with the described criteria, one annual low-dose thoracic computed tomographic exploration can be applied to 7.2% of the patients attended (95% confidence interval: 4.2-9.6), with at least one follow-up exploration in another 1.3%, with the generation of at least 2 extra visits for explanation of the protocol and results. If smoking habit does not change over the next 2 years, another 4.3% of the patients will have met the inclusion criteria. Early detection of lung cancer with low-dose thoracic computed tomographic could be of interest in HIV-infected patients because of the increased of risk but would imply an increase in care burden that must be taken into account.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document