Topotecan, an active drug in the second-line treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: results of a large European phase II study.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. 3056-3061 ◽  
Author(s):  
G J Creemers ◽  
G Bolis ◽  
M Gore ◽  
G Scarfone ◽  
A J Lacave ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Topotecan is a topoisomerase I inhibitor with preclinical activity against various tumor types. We conducted a large multicenter phase II study with topotecan in ovarian cancer in patients who had failed to respond to one prior cisplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d was administered intravenously by 30-minute infusion for 5 days repeated every 3 weeks. As the cisplatin-free interval relates to response in subsequent treatment, patients were stratified in subgroups, ie, cisplatin-refractory, cisplatin-resistant, and cisplatin-sensitive. RESULTS One-hundred eleven patients entered the study. Nineteen patients were considered to be ineligible; 92 patients were assessable for response. A total of 552 courses were given (median, four per patient; range, one to 17). The major toxicities were leukocytopenia and neutropenia, which were grade 3 to 4 in 54.2% and 69.1% of courses, respectively, but with only 4.3% of these being grade 4 neutropenia plus fever or infectious complications. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given in 20.5% of courses to maintain dose-intensity. Other relatively frequent side effects were alopecia (82%), nausea (36.4%), and vomiting (17.5%). The overall response rate was 16.3%, with one complete response (CR) and 14 partial responses (PRs). In the cisplatin-refractory, cisplatin-resistant, and cisplatin-sensitive strata, the response rates were 5.9%, 17.8%, and 26.7%, respectively. The median duration of time of documented response was 21.7 weeks (range, 4.6 to 41.9). CONCLUSION Topotecan in a daily-times-five schedule is an effective regimen as second-line treatment in ovarian cancer. Further investigations of topotecan in ovarian cancer, including first-line use and combination with other active agents, are indicated.

Oncology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 80 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 238-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bruzzone ◽  
M.G. Centurioni ◽  
P. Giglione ◽  
M. Gualco ◽  
D.F. Merlo ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 1348-1353 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Ferrandina ◽  
M Ludovisi ◽  
R De Vincenzo ◽  
V Salutari ◽  
D Lorusso ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 709-713 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.S. de Jong ◽  
P.H.B. Willemse ◽  
H. Boonstra ◽  
E.G.E. de Vries ◽  
W.T.A. van der Graaf ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS183-TPS183
Author(s):  
Atsushi Ishiguro ◽  
Yasuyuki Kawamoto ◽  
Satoshi Yuki ◽  
Yoshimitsu Kobayashi ◽  
Kazuaki Harada ◽  
...  

TPS183 Background: As second-line chemotherapy for gastric cancer, a survival benefit has been shown in several clinical trials. Irinotecan and taxanes are recommended as second-line regimen. However, therapeutic outcomes have remained unsatisfactory and more effective treatment are expected. Ramucirumab (RAM) is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) antibody that prevents ligand binding of VEGF-A, VEGF-C, and VEGF-D and the receptor-mediated pathway activation in endothelial cells, subsequently inhibiting neovascularization. In the REGARD study, RAM monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma improved median overall survival (mOS) compared with placebo. Moreover, in the RAINBOW study, RAM plus paclitaxel (PTX) versus placebo plus PTX, mOS showed significantly longer in RAM plus PTX group than in placebo plus PTX group. In contrast, there are no data on the efficacy of RAM and irinotecan in the second-line treatment for gastric cancer. The WJOG 4007 study demonstrated an equivalent efficacy between irinotecan and PTX. In this study, we propose to examine the efficacy of RAM plus irinotecan. Methods: This study is carried out as a multicenter, non-randomized, single arm, prospective, phase II study. The patients with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer that is refractory or intolerance to primary chemotherapy are eligible for this study. RAM and irinotecan combination therapy is administered every two weeks, which is continued until progression or emergence of adverse events requiring discontinuation. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival rate at six months, and the secondary endpoints are OS, progression-free survival, response rate, safety, and dose intensity for each drug. A total of 35 cases areplanned for registration. This study is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network. Clinical trial information: UMIN000030372.


1998 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Keldsen ◽  
Ebbe Lindegaard Madsen ◽  
Hanne Havsteen ◽  
Claus Kamby ◽  
Lone Laursen ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Salvatore Grisanti ◽  
Vittorio D. Ferrari ◽  
Michela Buglione ◽  
Giorgio M. Agazzi ◽  
Roberto Liserre ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 1171-1175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Kitamura ◽  
Keisuke Taguchi ◽  
Yasuharu Kunishima ◽  
Masahiro Yanase ◽  
Atsushi Takahashi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. clincanres.1789.2021
Author(s):  
E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Katherine A Guthrie ◽  
Philip A Philip ◽  
Elizabeth M. Swisher ◽  
Florencia Jalikis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document