Randomized 2 × 2 Trial Evaluating Hormonal Treatment and the Duration of Chemotherapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: An Update Based on 10 Years’ Follow-Up

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Sauerbrei ◽  
G. Bastert ◽  
H. Bojar ◽  
C. Beyerle ◽  
R. L. A. Neumann ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: In 1984, the German Breast Cancer Study Group started a multicenter randomized trial to compare six versus three cycles of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) starting perioperatively and to investigate the additional effect of tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment in node-positive breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1984 to 1989, 473 patients were randomized from 41 institutions. After a median follow-up of approximately 10 years for overall survival (OS) and 9 years for event-free survival (EFS), the treatment groups were compared with respect to OS and EFS. Results based on a median follow-up of 56 months have been published earlier. RESULTS: Estimated cumulative locoregional incidence rate after 10 years was 19.9%; the corresponding rate of distant recurrences was 41.3%. Concerning duration of chemotherapy, we did not find any difference between six and three cycles of CMF (EFS: relative risk [RR] in multivariate analysis = 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.21 OS: RR = 0.90; 95% CI, = 0.69 to 1.18). Treatment with tamoxifen resulted in an improvement in outcome (EFS: RR = 0.81; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.07, OS: RR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.0) although it proved not significant. Number of positive lymph nodes and progesterone receptor were the dominant prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: In this study, we observed some tendency in favor of hormonal treatment, which is in agreement with the literature. Concerning duration of chemotherapy, the results of this study provide further evidence that a reduction to three cycles of CMF is possible without increasing the risk of recurrence or death. For a definitive conclusion, however, further investigations are required.

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 602-611 ◽  
Author(s):  

PURPOSE: To determine the influence of the epirubicin dose in operable node-positive breast cancer patients with factors of poor prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1990 and July 1993, 565 operable breast cancer patients with either more than three positive nodes or between one and three positive nodes with Scarff Bloom Richardson grade ≥ 2 and hormone receptor negativity were randomized after surgery to receive either fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 50 mg/m2, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 every 21 days for six cycles (FEC 50) or the same regimen except with epirubicin dose of 100 mg/m2 (FEC 100). Postmenopausal patients received tamoxifen 30 mg/d for 3 years at the beginning of chemotherapy. Radiotherapy was delivered at the end of chemotherapy in both groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 67 months. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 54.8% with FEC 50 and 66.3% with FEC 100 (P = .03). The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 65.3% and 77.4%, respectively (P = .007). The mean relative dose-intensity was similar in the two groups (90.3% and 86.1%, respectively). Neutropenia and anemia were significantly more frequent in FEC 100 (P < 10−3), as were nausea-vomiting (P = .008) and stomatitis and alopecia (P < 10−3). Nine cases of grade 3 infection occurred only with FEC 100, and no toxic deaths occurred. Three cases of acute cardiac toxicity were observed (FEC50 = 1, FEC100 = 2) and 10 patients (FEC50 = 6, FEC100 = 4) presented delayed cardiac dysfunctions. Two cases of secondary leukemia were observed (acute lymphatic leukemia with FEC 50 and acute myelogenous leukemia with FEC 100). CONCLUSION: After 5 years of follow-up, the increased epirubicin dose led to a significant benefit in terms of DFS and OS, with a high survival rate among patients with poor-prognosis breast cancer.


1998 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. S41
Author(s):  
W. Sauerbrei ◽  
G. Bastert ◽  
H. Bojar ◽  
C. Schmoor ◽  
M. Schumacher

1995 ◽  
Vol 191 (10) ◽  
pp. 982-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Aubele ◽  
G. Auer ◽  
A. Voss ◽  
U. Falkmer ◽  
L. Rutquist ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document