Clinical relevance of HER-2 expression in node-negative breast cancer patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 598-598
Author(s):  
J. M. Sun ◽  
W. Han ◽  
D. W. Kim ◽  
T. Y. Kim ◽  
I. A. E. Park ◽  
...  
2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 598-598
Author(s):  
J. M. Sun ◽  
W. Han ◽  
D. W. Kim ◽  
T. Y. Kim ◽  
I. A. E. Park ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (14) ◽  
pp. 2708-2712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalisa Volpi ◽  
Oriana Nanni ◽  
Franca De Paola ◽  
Anna Maria Granato ◽  
Annita Mangia ◽  
...  

Purpose: We analyzed the clinical relevance of HER-2 expression, widely investigated in breast cancer but with contradictory results, in the largest case series of node-negative breast cancer patients investigated to date. Patients and Methods: The pure prognostic value of HER-2 expression was investigated in 529 patients treated with locoregional therapy alone until early relapse. Proliferative activity was evaluated as [ 3 H]thymidine labeling index and HER-2 expression by immunohistochemistry. All biologic determinations were conducted within the context of an intra- and interlaboratory National Quality Control Program. Results: HER-2 expression was not related to relapse-free survival in the overall series but was a significant discriminant of prognosis in the subgroup of patients with rapidly proliferating tumors. Six-year rate of relapse was 40% for patients with highly (≥30%) positive tumors and 26% for those with weakly HER-2-expressing tumors (P = .039). Conclusion: HER-2 expression in association with proliferative activity identifies a subgroup of node-negative breast cancer patients with the worst prognosis, who are candidates for specific intensive adjuvant therapy.


2001 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. S121
Author(s):  
F. Valcamonico ◽  
G. Grigolato ◽  
F. Donato ◽  
V.D. Ferrari ◽  
E. Simoncini ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 815-820 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. E. Tevis ◽  
R. Bassett ◽  
I. Bedrosian ◽  
C. H. Barcenas ◽  
D. M. Black ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 102-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
An De Groef ◽  
Marijke Van Kampen ◽  
Elena Tieto ◽  
Petra Schönweger ◽  
Marie-Rose Christiaens ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. S118
Author(s):  
H.J. Park ◽  
K. Shin ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
S. Ahn ◽  
S. Kim ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 111-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gravier ◽  
G. Pierron ◽  
A. Vincent-Salomon ◽  
N. Gruel ◽  
V. Raynal ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Prechtl ◽  
N. Harbeck ◽  
C. Thomssen ◽  
C. Meisner ◽  
M. Braun ◽  
...  

In axillary node-negative primary breast cancer, 70% of the patients will be cured by locoregional treatment alone. Therefore, adjuvant systemic therapy is only needed for those 30% of node-negative patients who will relapse after primary therapy and eventually die of metastases. Traditional histomorphological and clinical factors do not provide sufficient information to allow accurate risk group assessment in order to identify node-negative patients who might benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. In the last decade various groups have reported a strong and statistically independent prognostic impact of the serine protease uPA (urokinase-type plasminogen activator) and its inhibitor PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1) in node-negative breast cancer patients. Based on these data, a prospective multicenter therapy trial in node-negative breast cancer patients was started in Germany in June 1993, supported by the German Research Association (DFG). Axillary node-negative breast cancer patients with high levels of either or both proteolytic factors in the tumor tissue were randomized to adjuvant CMF chemotherapy versus observation only. Recruitment was continued until the end of 1998, by which time 684 patients had been enrolled. Since then, patients have been followed up in order to assess the value of uPA and PAI-1 determination as an adequate selection criterion for adjuvant chemotherapy in node-negative breast cancer patients. This paper reports on the rationale and design of this prospective multicenter clinical trial, which may have an impact on future policies in prognosis-oriented treatment strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document