Emotional Distress: The Sixth Vital Sign in Cancer Care

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (26) ◽  
pp. 6440-6441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry D. Bultz ◽  
Linda E. Carlson
2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barry D. Bultz ◽  
Linda E. Carlson

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1719-1727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michèle Aubin ◽  
Lucie Vézina ◽  
René Verreault ◽  
Lise Fillion ◽  
Éveline Hudon ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-80
Author(s):  
Gurkamal S. Chatta ◽  
David Michael Aboulafia ◽  
Amy Brockmeyer ◽  
Molly Bumpus ◽  
Irina Dimitrova ◽  
...  

80 Background: High quality and safe medical care has been a consistent goal of the medical community at Virginia Mason Medical Center (VMMC). The Am Soc of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has set out a list of criteria as part of Its Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI), which are increasingly being adopted as standards for quality measurement in the Oncology community. Our practice at VMMC participated in the QOPI quality metric survey, with the intent of measuring and enhancing cancer care delivery. Methods: We participated in the web-based QOPI quality metric during the September, 2013 and April, 2014 sessions. Chart abstraction was shared by the providers. Following the Sept session, our performance was analyzed, and targeted areas of improvement were collectively identified by all providers. Following the April session, the clinical note format was changed to incorporate a standard template, addressing areas of underperformance. Results: In the September 2013 session, the primary areas of underperformance were assessment of: a) pain, b) emotional distress, c) performance status (PFS), and d) documentation of staging. Following the April 2014 session, we noted improved performance in all these assessments. Thus, pain reporting rates improved from 40.6 to 61.2%; emotional distress screening from 37.3% to 42.8%; PFS documentation from 42.6 to 53.7%; and staging at initial diagnosis from 74.6% to 80.9%. However our areas of underperformance continued to lag 10 to 30% behind QOPI aggregate reporting rates. With the introduction of a structured note in the electronic medical record (EMR), further improvements are expected the results of which will be reported at the time of the meeting. On the positive side, chemotherapy education and discussion of risk/benefit were consistently areas of superior performance in our practice with our reporting rates being 10 to 40% higher than the QOPI aggregate. Conclusions: QOPI participation is a useful tool for improving and sustaining a high level of practice performance in oncology. Structured notes in the EMR maybe indispensable for maintaining a high level of compliance with performance measures.


2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Watson ◽  
B. D. Bultz
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1273-1280
Author(s):  
Csaba L. Dégi
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 801-805
Author(s):  
Barry D. Bultz ◽  
Matthew J. Loscalzo ◽  
Alex J. Mitchell ◽  
Jimmie C. Holland

Multiple studies have demonstrated that cancer patients are likely to encounter complex biopsychosocial distress at time of diagnosis and during treatment, recurrence, and end-of life care. Since the branding of distress as the sixth vital sign, there has been widespread attention to seeing comprehensive biopsychosocial screening and monitoring patient distress as an essential standard of best practice. To date, this standard has been widely accepted globally, endorsed, and now required for institutional cancer care accreditation. This chapter builds on the previous edition of Psycho-Oncology, where Jimmie Holland, considered the founder of psycho-oncology, strongly supported the inclusion of distress screening as a standard of cancer care and made a case for distress being named the sixth vital sign. The implementation of screening for distress as part of patient-reported outcomes would facilitate the timely and appropriate referral for optimal care inclusive of the need for psychosocial support. In addition to the implications for higher-quality and precision supportive care, this chapter will discuss the economic benefits to the institution by implementing standardized distress screening.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document