Impact of Short-Term Preoperative Radiotherapy on Health-Related Quality of Life and Sexual Functioning in Primary Rectal Cancer: Report of a Multicenter Randomized Trial

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1847-1858 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corrie A.M. Marijnen ◽  
Cornelis J.H. van de Velde ◽  
Hein Putter ◽  
Mandy van den Brink ◽  
Cornelis P. Maas ◽  
...  

Background Few prospective studies have been performed about the impact of preoperative radiotherapy (PRT) or total mesorectal excision (TME) on health-related quality of life (HRQL) and sexual functioning in patients with resectable rectal cancer. This report describes the HRQL and sexual functioning of 990 patients who underwent TME and were randomly assigned to short-term PRT (5 × 5 Gy). Patients and Methods The Rotterdam Symptom Check List supplemented with additional items was used with questionnaires before treatment and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after surgery. Patients without a recurrence the first 2 years were analyzed (n = 990). Results Few differences were found in HRQL between patients treated with or without PRT. Daily activities were significantly less for PRT patients 3 months postoperatively. Irradiated patients recovered slower from defecation problems than TME-only patients (P = .006). PRT had a negative effect on sexual functioning in males (P = .004) and females (P < .001). Irradiated males had more ejaculation disorders (P = .002), and erectile functioning deteriorated over time (P < .001). PRT had similar effects in patients who underwent a low anterior resection (LAR) versus an abdominoperineal resection (APR). Patients with an APR scored better on the physical (P = .004) and psychologic dimension (P = .007) than LAR patients, but worse on voiding (P = .0007). Conclusion Short-term PRT leads to more sexual dysfunction, slower recovery of bowel function, and impaired daily activity postoperatively. However, this does not seriously affect HRQL. The comparison between LAR and APR patients demonstrates that the existence of a permanent stoma is not the only determinant of HRQL.

Cephalalgia ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 414-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
CGH Dahlöf

Health-related quality of life (HQL) assessment in the clinical setting have distinguished subjective perceptions (e.g. well-being), signs/symptoms of the disease, and functional capacity as three major components. The impact of short-term treatment for migraine attacks on these variables was evaluated in an open prospective 6-month study at the Gothenburg Migraine Clinic. Socio-economic factors, subjective symptoms, and general well-being/quality of life were evaluated by self-administered questionnaires in 99 patients with migraine with or without aura in accordance with the classification of the International Headache Society. Short-term treatment comprising conventional therapy or subcutaneous sumatriptan reduced number of days per month with migraine and absenteeism from work, migraine-associated symptoms, but did not significantly improve general well-being between attacks. Future assessment of the patients' HQL in accordance with this approach would enable us to consider all the advantages and disadvantages of current therapies of particular interest in the field of migraine.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice M. Couwenberg ◽  
Fleur S.A. de Beer ◽  
Martijn P.W. Intven ◽  
Johannes P.M. Burbach ◽  
Anke B. Smits ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 979-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan J. Traa ◽  
Ricardo G. Orsini ◽  
Brenda L. Den Oudsten ◽  
Jolanda De Vries ◽  
Jan A. Roukema ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 1227-1234
Author(s):  
Marcelo Coelho Goiato ◽  
Andressa Paschoal Amoroso ◽  
Bruna Silva ◽  
Emerson Gomes dos santos ◽  
Fernanda Pereira de Caxias ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document