Randomized Clinical Trial Design for Assessing Noninferiority When Superiority Is Expected

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (31) ◽  
pp. 5019-5023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boris Freidlin ◽  
Edward L. Korn ◽  
Stephen L. George ◽  
Robert Gray

The randomized clinical trial (RCT) is the gold standard for definitive evaluation of new therapies. RCTs designed to show that the therapeutic efficacy of a new therapy is not unacceptably inferior to that of standard therapy are called noninferiority trials. Traditionally, noninferiority trials have required very large sample sizes. Sometimes, a new treatment regimen with a favorable toxicity and/or tolerability profile is also expected to have some modest improvement in efficacy. In such specialized settings we describe a hybrid trial-design approach that requires a dramatically smaller sample size than that of a standard noninferiority design. This hybrid design can naturally incorporate a formal test of superiority as well as noninferiority.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 649-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francisco E. Vera-Badillo ◽  
Andrew J. Robinson ◽  
David M. Berman ◽  
Christopher M. Booth

Medwave ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (03) ◽  
pp. e7869-e7869
Author(s):  
Sebastián Estrada ◽  
Marcelo Arancibia ◽  
Jana Stojanova ◽  
Cristian Papuzinski

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 100660
Author(s):  
Ida Babakhanyan ◽  
Melissa Jensen ◽  
Rosemay A. Remigio-Baker ◽  
Paul Sargent ◽  
Jason M. Bailie

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 557-566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Boel Bengtsson ◽  
Anders Heijl ◽  
Gauti Johannesson ◽  
Sabina Andersson-Geimer ◽  
Johan Aspberg ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maria Grazia Valsecchi ◽  
Stefania Galimberti ◽  
Pamela Kearns

Many important improvements have been achieved in the last decades in the diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis of paediatric cancers. These were possible through clinical trials that were mainly the result of collaborative efforts of national and international groups. For a clinical trial to have the best chance of success, it must ask a clear question that is seen as important both to the clinicians who will implement the trial and to the patients who will participate. Moreover, the design of such trials needs a sound methodological approach in order to provide reliable evidence. This chapter has the following aims: (a) to review the most common conventional approaches that allow to reliably define the benefit of a new drug or a new treatment strategy, and (b) to provide information on novel strategies for clinical trial design that can be useful in the context of rare diseases such as paediatric cancers.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 1495-1500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward W Hook ◽  
Lori Newman ◽  
George Drusano ◽  
Scott Evans ◽  
H Hunter Handsfield ◽  
...  

Abstract Gonorrhea remains a major public health challenge, and current recommendations for gonorrhea treatment are threatened by evolving antimicrobial resistance and a diminished pipeline for new antibiotics. Evaluations of potential new treatments for gonorrhea currently make limited use of new understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic contributors to effective therapy, the prevention of antimicrobial resistance, and newer designs for clinical trials. They are hampered by the requirement to utilize combination ceftriaxone/azithromycin therapy as the comparator regimen in noninferiority trials designed to seek an indication for gonorrhea therapy. Evolving gonococcal epidemiology and clinical trial design constraints hinder the enrollment of those populations at the greatest risk for gonorrhea (adolescents, women, and persons infected with antibiotic-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae). This article summarizes a recent meeting on the evaluation process for antimicrobials for urogenital gonorrhea treatment and encourages the consideration of new designs for the evaluation of gonorrhea therapy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard Trachtman ◽  
Debbie S. Gipson ◽  
Michael Somers ◽  
Cathie Spino ◽  
Sharon Adler ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document