Sentinel lymph node micrometastasis detection using immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for cytokeratin 19 in breast cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11074-11074
Author(s):  
Q. Cao ◽  
S. Wang ◽  
X. Liu ◽  
L. Lin ◽  
J. Zhao

11074 Background: In breast cancer, the sentinel lymph node (SLN) can be used to assess the axillary nodal status to guide the axillary surgery, tumor staging and adjuvant systematic therapy. Histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC) are currently the routine methods of SLN assay. The facts that about 30% of node-negative breast cancer patients relapse within five years and that micrometastasis were found in 9%∼30% negative lymph nodes when they were re-examined using serial sectioning suggest that current histological detection methods are inadequate for identifying metastatic tumor cells in lymph nodes. The primary objective of this study was to develop an assay by using a combination of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin 19 (KT19) expression in SLN. Methods:139 SLN samples were collected from 139 breast cancer patients undergoing SLN biopsy using Isosulfan Blue dye during modified mastectomy between June 2002 and June 2005. The SLNs were dissected into two parts, half were frozen in liquid nitrogen during sugery for RT-PCR detection and another half were kept in liquor formaldehyde for routine hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) examination and IHC detection. In 62 tumor-negative SLNs at routine H&E examination (pN0), we performed IHC and RT-PCR for KT19. Results: Of the 62 tumor-negative SLNs at routine H&E examination, 11% (7/62) were positive on extensive IHC analyses for KT-19, which were all positively identified by RT-PCR assay. Six SLNs (10%) were negative for micrometastases (with H&E and IHC for KT-19) but RT-PCR positive. There was asignificant difference in detective rate between these two methods statistically (χ2 = 4.1667 , P = 0.0412) and the coincidence were high ( kappa = 0.6483) Conclusions: As IHC analysis resulted in a 11% detection rate in H&E negative SLNs, IHC is essential to avoid false- negative SLN micrometastases. Molecular analysis with KT19 allows detection of breast cancer micrometastases with an additional 10% detection rate in H&E negative SLNs and resulted in a high coincidence with IHC analysis. However, the clinical value of these histologically negative but RT-PCR positive SLNs can only be determined with long term follow up. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Péley ◽  
J. Tóth ◽  
O. Csuka ◽  
I. Sinkovics ◽  
E. Farkas ◽  
...  

In this study the nodal staging sensitivity of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with detailed pathological and molecular biological examination has been investigated and compared to that of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) with routine histological evaluation. Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were removed by the dual-agent injection technique in 68 patients with primary, clinically node-negative breast cancer. Forty-seven patients had negative SLNs according to hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. These H&E-negative SLNs were serially sectioned and examined at 250 μm levels by anticytokeratin immunohistochemistry (IHC). In 14 patients the SLNs were also investigated by cytokeratin 20 (CK20) reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). SLNB with IHC increased the node-positive rate by 26% (by 40% in tumors less than or equal to 2 cm in size (pT1) and by 9% in tumors more than 2 cm but less than or equal to 5 cm in size (pT2)). The sensitivity of SLNB with IHC was superior to that of ALND with routine histology in pT1 tumors and identical in pT2 tumors. The concordance between histology and RT-PCR was only 21%, and in two of three cases with positive histological results RT-PCR was negative. In conclusion, SLNB with detailed pathological and/or molecular biological evaluation can improve the sensitivity of regional staging. ALND can probably be abandoned in patients with pT1 SLN-negative breast cancer. Further prospective studies are required to determine the clinical significance of these detailed SLN evaluation techniques, but at present these methods are still investigational.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document