Interval between first palliative care consultation and death in patients with advanced cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9028-9028 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. El Osta ◽  
J. Palmer ◽  
T. Paraskevopoulos ◽  
B. Pei ◽  
L. Roberts ◽  
...  

9028 Background: Most referrals to acute palliative care (PC) services occur late in the trajectory of the disease, although an earlier intervention can decrease patients’ (pts) symptoms distress. The purpose of this study was to determine the time interval between first palliative care consultation (PC1) and death (D) in pts diagnosed with advanced cancer (aCA) at our comprehensive cancer center and whether such interval has increased over time. Methods: The study group was 2,868 consecutive pts who had their PC1 during a 30-month period. We reviewed the charts for information about demographics, cancer type, date of cancer diagnosis, aCA diagnosis, PC1, and D. aCA was defined as locally recurrent or metastatic. Results: 1,404 pts (49%) were female, 1,791 (62%) were < 65 years old, 2,563 (89%) had solid cancer, and 2,004 (70%) were white. The median PC1-D, aCA- PC1, and aCA-D intervals were 40, 114, and 243 days respectively. The median PC1-D interval (days) was: 47 for pts with solid cancer vs 14 for pts with hematological malignancy (p < 0.0001); 44 for pts < 65 years old vs 36 for pts = 65 years old (p = 0.002); 45 for females vs 37 for males (p = 0.004); 40 for white pts vs 41 for pts from other ethnicities (p = 0.42). The median PC1-D interval in 5 consecutive half-years was 46, 56, 42, 41, and 34 days respectively (p = 0.02). The total number of pts referred for PC1 in this period increased 20%, from 544 to 654. The ratio of PC involvement period in the aCA-D interval (PC1-D/aCA-D) decreased from 0.30 to 0.26 over the 5 half-year periods (p = 0.0004) ( Table ). Conclusions: Patients with solid cancers, younger pts, and females pts were referred earlier to acute PC. Referral timing was not affected by ethnicity. The interval between first palliative care consult and death has decreased over time. Education is needed among referring physicians to increase this interval. Further research on increasing acute PC access and its impact on PC1-D interval is needed. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 61 ◽  
Author(s):  
SamiAyed Alshammary ◽  
Abdullah Alsuhail ◽  
BalajiP Duraisamy ◽  
Savithiri Ratnapalan ◽  
SaadHamad Alabdullateef

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e10-e19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin A. Yu ◽  
Kristin N. Ray ◽  
Seo Young Park ◽  
Amanda Barry ◽  
Cardinale B. Smith ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: The proportion of patients with advanced cancer who receive outpatient specialty palliative care (OSPC) is as low as 2.0%. Improved understanding of the system-level factors influencing use of OSPC could inform adaptations to the delivery of palliative care to maximize access. We examined associations between OSPC use among patients with advanced solid tumors and oncology-OSPC clinic colocation and patient travel time to an OSPC clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced solid tumors receiving oncologic treatment between January 1 and December 31, 2016, within a comprehensive cancer center network with well-established, oncology-specific OSPC clinics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations of clinic colocation and geographic access with OSPC use. RESULTS: Of 9,485 patients with advanced solid tumors, 478 (5.0%) received OSPC services in 2016. After controlling for age, sex, marital status, cancer type, insurance, treatment intent, and illness severity, patients whose oncologist practices were colocated with OSPC clinics were more likely to use OSPC (odds ratio [OR], 19.2; 95% CI, 14.1 to 26.2). Compared with patients who lived > 90 minutes from an OSPC clinic, patients with travel times of < 30 minutes (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.2 to 4.6) and 31 to 60 minutes (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6 to 3.6) were also more likely to use OSPC. CONCLUSION: Among patients with advanced solid tumors, colocation of oncology and OSPC clinics and shorter patient travel time were associated with greater odds of using OSPC. Future efforts to increase OSPC use in this population should consider clinic colocation and travel burden.


2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navneet Dhillon ◽  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Be Lian Pei ◽  
Egidio Del Fabbro ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
...  

Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (8) ◽  
pp. 2036-2043 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hui ◽  
Ahmed Elsayem ◽  
Zhijun Li ◽  
Maxine De La Cruz ◽  
J. Lynn Palmer ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document