scholarly journals System-Level Factors Associated With Use of Outpatient Specialty Palliative Care Among Patients With Advanced Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. e10-e19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin A. Yu ◽  
Kristin N. Ray ◽  
Seo Young Park ◽  
Amanda Barry ◽  
Cardinale B. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Travel Time ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
System Level ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Patient Travel

PURPOSE: The proportion of patients with advanced cancer who receive outpatient specialty palliative care (OSPC) is as low as 2.0%. Improved understanding of the system-level factors influencing use of OSPC could inform adaptations to the delivery of palliative care to maximize access. We examined associations between OSPC use among patients with advanced solid tumors and oncology-OSPC clinic colocation and patient travel time to an OSPC clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced solid tumors receiving oncologic treatment between January 1 and December 31, 2016, within a comprehensive cancer center network with well-established, oncology-specific OSPC clinics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the associations of clinic colocation and geographic access with OSPC use. RESULTS: Of 9,485 patients with advanced solid tumors, 478 (5.0%) received OSPC services in 2016. After controlling for age, sex, marital status, cancer type, insurance, treatment intent, and illness severity, patients whose oncologist practices were colocated with OSPC clinics were more likely to use OSPC (odds ratio [OR], 19.2; 95% CI, 14.1 to 26.2). Compared with patients who lived > 90 minutes from an OSPC clinic, patients with travel times of < 30 minutes (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.2 to 4.6) and 31 to 60 minutes (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6 to 3.6) were also more likely to use OSPC. CONCLUSION: Among patients with advanced solid tumors, colocation of oncology and OSPC clinics and shorter patient travel time were associated with greater odds of using OSPC. Future efforts to increase OSPC use in this population should consider clinic colocation and travel burden.

Interval between first palliative care consultation and death in patients with advanced cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9028-9028 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. El Osta ◽  
J. Palmer ◽  
T. Paraskevopoulos ◽  
B. Pei ◽  
L. Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
Over Time

9028 Background: Most referrals to acute palliative care (PC) services occur late in the trajectory of the disease, although an earlier intervention can decrease patients’ (pts) symptoms distress. The purpose of this study was to determine the time interval between first palliative care consultation (PC1) and death (D) in pts diagnosed with advanced cancer (aCA) at our comprehensive cancer center and whether such interval has increased over time. Methods: The study group was 2,868 consecutive pts who had their PC1 during a 30-month period. We reviewed the charts for information about demographics, cancer type, date of cancer diagnosis, aCA diagnosis, PC1, and D. aCA was defined as locally recurrent or metastatic. Results: 1,404 pts (49%) were female, 1,791 (62%) were < 65 years old, 2,563 (89%) had solid cancer, and 2,004 (70%) were white. The median PC1-D, aCA- PC1, and aCA-D intervals were 40, 114, and 243 days respectively. The median PC1-D interval (days) was: 47 for pts with solid cancer vs 14 for pts with hematological malignancy (p < 0.0001); 44 for pts < 65 years old vs 36 for pts = 65 years old (p = 0.002); 45 for females vs 37 for males (p = 0.004); 40 for white pts vs 41 for pts from other ethnicities (p = 0.42). The median PC1-D interval in 5 consecutive half-years was 46, 56, 42, 41, and 34 days respectively (p = 0.02). The total number of pts referred for PC1 in this period increased 20%, from 544 to 654. The ratio of PC involvement period in the aCA-D interval (PC1-D/aCA-D) decreased from 0.30 to 0.26 over the 5 half-year periods (p = 0.0004) ( Table ). Conclusions: Patients with solid cancers, younger pts, and females pts were referred earlier to acute PC. Referral timing was not affected by ethnicity. The interval between first palliative care consult and death has decreased over time. Education is needed among referring physicians to increase this interval. Further research on increasing acute PC access and its impact on PC1-D interval is needed. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Antineoplastic therapy use in patients with advanced cancer admitted to an acute palliative care unit at a comprehensive cancer center

Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (8) ◽  
pp. 2036-2043 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Hui ◽  
Ahmed Elsayem ◽  
Zhijun Li ◽  
Maxine De La Cruz ◽  
J. Lynn Palmer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Antineoplastic Therapy ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care Unit ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center

Symptom Assessment and Early Access to Supportive and Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors in Mexico

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirza Jacqueline Alcalde-Castro ◽  
Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis ◽  
Alfredo Covarrubias-Gómez ◽  
Sofía Sánchez-Román ◽  
Paulina Quiróz-Friedman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Supportive Care ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Symptom Assessment ◽  
First Year ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Oncology Care

Background: Early specialized palliative care improves quality of life of patients with advanced cancer, and guidelines encourage its integration into standard oncology care. However, many patients fail to obtain timely palliative/supportive care evaluations, particularly in limited-resource settings. We aimed to determine the proportion of patients with advanced cancer who received an assessment of symptoms and were referred to supportive and palliative care services during the first year after diagnosis in a Mexican hospital. Methods: Individuals with newly diagnosed advanced solid tumors and 1 year of follow-up at the oncology clinics in the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran in Mexico City from October 2015 to April 2016 were included in this retrospective study. Results: Seventy-seven patients were included. Forty-two (54.5%) were referred to the various supportive care services during the first year after diagnosis, and 23 (29.8%) were referred to the palliative care clinic. The most commonly assessed symptoms by oncologists were pain (77.9%), anorexia (74.0%), fatigue (68.8%), and nausea (55.8%), while depression/anxiety were evaluated in 10 (12.9%) patients. The oncologist offered to clarify treatment goals in 39 (50.6%) cases and evaluated the understanding of diagnosis/illness and prognosis in 22 (28.5%). Conclusion: Palliative and supportive care services were widely underutilized, which may be related to a lack of standardized symptom assessments and poor end-of-life communication. Novel strategies are needed to improve the implementation of tools for systematic symptom assessment and to optimize the integration of supportive care interventions into oncology care in developing countries.

Access to palliative care before death among patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
David Hui ◽  
Sun Hyun Kim ◽  
Jung Hye Kwon ◽  
Kimberson Cochien Tanco ◽  
Tao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Disease Process ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Medical Team ◽  
Missed Opportunities

25 Background: Palliative care (PC) access is a critical component of quality cancer care. Previous studies on PC access have mostly examined the timing of PC referral. The proportion of patients who actually received PC is unclear. We determined the proportion of cancer patients who received PC at our comprehensive cancer center, and the predictors of PC referral. Methods: We reviewed the charts ofconsecutive patients with advanced cancer from the Houston region seen at MD Anderson Cancer Center and died between September 2009 and February 2010. We compared patients who received PC services with those who did not receive PC services before death using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Results: A total of 366/816 (45%) decedents had a PC consultation. The median interval between PC consultation and death was 1.4 months (interquartile range (0.5-4.2) and the median number of medical team encounters before PC was 20 (6-45). In multivariate analysis, older age, being married, and specific cancer types (gynecology, lung and head and neck) were significantly associated with a PC referral (Table). Patients with hematologic malignancies had significantly fewer PC referrals (33%), the longest interval between advanced cancer diagnosis and PC consultation (median 16 months), the shortest interval between PC consultation and death (median 0.4 month), and one of the largest number of medical team encounters (median 38) before PC. Conclusions: We found that a majority of cancer patients at our cancer center did not access PC before they die. PC referral occurs late in the disease process with many missed opportunities for referral. Further effort is needed to improve quality of end-of-life care. [Table: see text]

Emergency department visits among patients with advanced solid tumors at a cancer center in Mexico City.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 52-52
Author(s):  
Miguel Araujo ◽  
Mirza Alcalde Castro ◽  
Enrique Soto Perez De Celis ◽  
Andrea De la O ◽  
Rafael Reyes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Mexico City ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Ed Visits

52 Background: Emergency department (ED) visits are a distressing event for patients with advanced cancer, and identifying planned, unplanned and avoidable ED visits is important for providing better cancer care. We studied the causes for ED visits, as well as potentially avoidable ED visits during palliative chemotherapy, among patients with advanced cancer treated at a public cancer center in Mexico City. Methods: Consecutive patients with newly diagnosed advanced solid tumors treated at Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán from 10/2015 to 03/2016 were screened. Patients who visited the ED during that period were included, and their demographic and clinical characteristics recorded. Number and reasons for ED visits were obtained from medical records. Among patients who received chemotherapy within the previous 30 days, the following reasons for ED visits were classified as avoidable: anemia, nausea, dehydration, neutropenia, diarrhea, pain, emesis, pneumonia, fever or sepsis (according to Centers for Medicare and Medicare Services Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting Program). Results: 77 patients were diagnosed with advanced solid tumors during the study period, of which 53 (69%) had at least one ED visit. Median age was 63 years (range, 19-88), and 47% were men (n = 25). 51% had gastrointestinal, 21% genitourinary and 28% other tumors. Median follow-up was 360 days. 95 ED visits were identified; with a median number of ED visits per patient of 1 (range 1-5). The most common causes of ED visits were: infections (n = 20; 21%), gastrointestinal disorders (n = 18; 19%), pain (n = 15; 16%), ascites (n = 14; 15%), anemia (n = 4; 4%), catheter dysfunction (n = 4; 4%), and other causes (n = 20; 21%). 57% of ED visits among patients who received chemotherapy within the previous 30 days were classified as potentially avoidable. Conclusions: Over two thirds of patients with newly diagnosed metastatic cancer had ED visits in the first year after diagnosis. Furthermore, more than a half of ED visits among patients receiving palliative chemotherapy were potentially avoidable. Strategies aimed at reducing ED visits are needed to improve quality of care for patients with advanced cancer.

Impact of parenteral opioid shortage on opioid prescriptions among patients seen by the palliative care team of a comprehensive cancer center.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 201-201
Author(s):  
Ali Haider ◽  
Yu Qian ◽  
Zhanni Lu ◽  
Syed Mussadiq Ali Akbar Naqvi ◽  
Amy Zhuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Cancer Pain Management ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

201 Background: Recent parenteral opioid shortage (POS) has the potential to impact cancer pain management in hospitalized patients. This study aims to compare changes in the opioid prescriptions by the inpatient palliative care (PC) team before and after the institution first reported the POS. Methods: We reviewed and compared the electronic health records of 386 consecutive eligible consultations seen by the inpatient PC team equally in one month before and after the announcement of POS on February 8, 2018. The eligibility criteria include (1) cancer diagnosis, (2) ≥18 years of age, (3) taking opioid medication at the time of consultation, and (4) having at least two consecutive visits with the PC team. Patient demographics, cancer type, opioid type, route, and dose defined as the morphine equivalent daily dose were assessed. Results: POS was associated with less use of parenteral opioids (patient controlled analgesia, and intravenous breakthrough) and more use of non-parenteral opioids (extended release, transdermal, and oral breakthrough) by the referring oncology teams, and PC team (P≤.001) (Table 1). At first PC follow-up, significantly less proportion of patients achieved better pain control after POS [119/193 (62%) versus 144/193 (75%) (P=.006)] However, at second PC follow-up, the proportion of pain improvement was similar in both cohorts. Conclusions: There is a significant change in opioid routes associated with POS. POS was associated with worse analgesia. More research is needed to better understand the impact of POS on cancer pain management.[Table: see text]

Care, quality, and cost implications of the timing of palliative care consultation among patients with advanced cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin Scibetta ◽  
Michael W. Rabow ◽  
Kathleen Kerr
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Direct Cost ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Comprehensive Cancer Center ◽  
Inpatient Cost ◽  
Cancer Center

8 Background: ASCO recommends that early palliative care (PC) be offered alongside standard cancer care for patients with metastatic cancer and/or high symptom burden. There is limited data about how the timing of PC affects the quality, intensity, and cost of care at the end of life for patients with advanced cancer. Methods: We analyzed administrative and billing data to assess patterns of healthcare utilization for a cohort of patients at an academic comprehensive cancer center who died from cancer between Jan 1, 2010 and May 31, 2012. We examined the associations of early PC (>90 days prior to death) versus late PC (<90 days prior to death) with QOPI, NQF, and other established quality metrics and direct cost of medical care in last 6 months of life. Results: Among 978 decedents who received treatment at the cancer center, only 298 (30%) had specialty PC referrals. Of these patients, 94 (9.6% of decedents, 31.5% of referrals) had early PC while 204 (21% of decedents, 68.5% of referrals) had late PC. Patients who received early PC had a lower rate of inpatient admissions in the last month of life (33% vs. 66%, p=0.002), lower rates of ICU stay in last month of life (5% vs. 20%, p=0.0005), fewer ED visits in last month (34% vs. 54%, p=0.0002), fewer instances of hospice length of service <3 days (7% vs. 20%, p=0.0001), and a lower rate of inpatient death (15% vs. 34%, p=0.0001). Most patients (84%) who received early PC were seen as outpatients, while late PC was mostly delivered in the hospital (82.4%). Of the late PC cohort, only 52 (25.4%) were ever seen in the outpatient PC clinic, but 170 (83%) had at least one oncology office visit 91-180 days prior to death. The direct cost of inpatient medical care in the last 6 months of life for patients with early PC was reduced when compared to patients who had late PC ($19k vs. $25.7k), while the direct cost of outpatient care was higher in the early PC compared to late PC population ($13k vs. $11.5k). Conclusions: Early PC is associated with less intensive medical care and improved quality outcomes at the EOL for patients with advanced cancer. Early PC results in a significant inpatient cost savings with a modest increase in outpatient costs. Early PC is likely best delivered in the outpatient setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document