Internal Mammary Nodes in Breast Cancer: Diagnosis and Implications for Patient Management—A Systematic Review

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (30) ◽  
pp. 4981-4989 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald C. Chen ◽  
Nancy U. Lin ◽  
Mehra Golshan ◽  
Jay R. Harris ◽  
Jennifer R. Bellon

The management of internal mammary nodes (IMNs) in breast cancer is controversial. Surgical series from the 1950s showed that one third of breast cancer patients had IMN involvement, with a higher risk in patients with medial tumors and/or positive axillary nodes. IMN metastasis has similar prognostic importance as axillary nodal involvement. However, after three randomized trials showed no survival benefit from extended mastectomy compared with radical or modified radical mastectomy, IMN dissection was largely abandoned. Recently, lymphoscintigraphy studies have renewed interest in IMN evaluation. Approximately one fifth of internal mammary sentinel nodes are pathologic, although most centers do not perform IMN biopsies because of concerns about morbidity and lack of established survival benefit. In addition, results from randomized trials testing the value of postmastectomy irradiation and a meta-analysis of 78 randomized trials have provided high levels of evidence that local-regional tumor control is associated with long-term survival improvements. This benefit was limited to trials that used systemic therapy, which was not routinely administered in the earlier surgical studies, although the contribution from IMN treatment is unclear. IMN irradiation has also been shown to cause increased cardiac morbidity. Before mature results from current randomized trials assessing the benefit of IMN irradiation become available, lymphoscintigraphy may be used to help guide decisions regarding systemic and local-regional treatment. However, even in patients with visualized primary IMN drainage, the potential benefit of treatment should be balanced against the risk of added morbidity.

1985 ◽  
Vol 202 (6) ◽  
pp. 702-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
UMBERTO VERONESI ◽  
NATALE CASCINELLI ◽  
MARCO GRECO ◽  
ROSARIA BUFALINO ◽  
ALBERTO MORABITO ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 506-511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronan W Glynn ◽  
Linda Williams ◽  
J Michael Dixon

INTRODUCTION The aims of this study were to investigate the practice of axillary lymph node management within different units throughout the UK, and to assess changes in practice since our previous survey in 2004. SUBJECTS AND METHODS A structured questionnaire was sent to 350 members of the British Association of Surgical Oncology. RESULTS There were 177 replies from respondents who managed more than 100 patients a year with breast cancer. Of these: 12 did not perform axillary ultrasound at all in their centre; 17 (10%) employed axillary node clearance (ANC) on all patients; 122(69%) performed sentinel node biopsy (SNB) with dual localisation; and 111 respondents had attended the New Start Course. Radioisotope was most frequently injected 2 h or more before operation. Just 13 surgeons were convinced of the value of dissecting internal mammary nodes visualised on a scan. Reasons for not using dual localisation included lack of nuclear medicine facilities, no local ARSAC licence holder, no probe, and no funding. Sixty-six surgeons stated that, if they had an ARSAC licence and could inject the radioactivity in theatre, this would be a major improvement. In addition, 83 (47%) did not perform SLNB in patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS Despite significant changes since 2004, substantial variation remains in management of the axilla. A number of surgeons are practicing outwith current guidelines.


Brachytherapy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. S43
Author(s):  
Alexander Petrovsky ◽  
Vartan Gevorkyan ◽  
Anna Zaytseva ◽  
Mikhail Nechushkin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document