Outcome of preoperative chemotherapy (POC) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC): Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT)

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4085-4085
Author(s):  
E. Tamburini ◽  
D. Tassinari ◽  
M. Papi ◽  
G. Oliverio ◽  
S. Nicoletti ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4098-4098
Author(s):  
Gaetan Des Guetz ◽  
Thierry Landre ◽  
Anne Larrouy ◽  
Yves Panis ◽  
Jean F. Morere ◽  
...  

4098 Background: Neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine (5FU or capecitabine)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been considered the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Whether addition of oxaliplatin (OXP) will further improve clinical outcomes is still unclear. Methods: To identify clinical trials combining oxaliplatin in preoperative CRT or perioperative chemotherapy for LARC published until December 2019, we searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library. We also search for relevant ASCO conferences. Primary endpoint was Disease-Free-Survival (DFS). Data were extracted from every study to perform a meta-analysis using Review Manager (version 5.3). Results: A total of 7 Randomized Clinical Trials (ACCORD-12, CARO-AIO-04, FOWARC, JIAO, NSABP, PETACC-6 and STAR-01) with 5782 stage II or III rectal cancer patients were analysed, including 2727 patients with OXP + 5FU regimen and 3055 patients with 5FU alone regimen. Compared with 5FU-based regimen group, OXP-based regimen group improved DFS (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81−0.99, P = 0.03) and increased pathologic Complete Response (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07−1.37, P = 0.002). Patients treated with OXP-regimen had significantly less metastatic disease (OR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.94; p = 0.007). Considering Adverse Events (AEs), there was more grade 3-4 diarrhoea with OXP (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.74−3.32, P < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences grade 3-4 haematologic AEs (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.87−1.57, P = 0.31). Conclusions: Combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine or 5FU in preoperative chemoradiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy seems beneficial significantly and improved DFS. It remains necessary to identify which patients benefit most from the addition of oxaliplatin.


Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (23) ◽  
pp. 6035
Author(s):  
Gaëtan Des Guetz ◽  
Thierry Landre ◽  
Marc A. Bollet ◽  
Muriel Mathonnet ◽  
Laurent Quéro

Background: Neoadjuvant fluoropyrimidine (5FU or capecitabine)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been considered the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Whether addition of oxaliplatin (OXP) will further improve clinical outcomes is still unclear. Methods: To identify clinical trials combining oxaliplatin in preoperative CRT or perioperative chemotherapy for LARC published until March 2021, we searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library. We also searched for relevant ASCO conference abstracts. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Data were extracted from every study to perform a meta-analysis using Review Manager (version 5.3). Results: A total of seven randomized clinical trials (ACCORD-12, CARO-AIO-04, FOWARC, JIAO, NSABP, PETACC-6, and STAR-01) with 5782 stage II or III rectal cancer patients were analyzed, including 2727 patients with OXP + 5FU regimen and 3055 patients with 5FU alone. Compared with the 5FU alone group, the OXP + 5FU regimen improved DFS (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.81–0.99, p = 0.03) and pathologic complete response (pCR) (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.07–1.37, p = 0.002). Patients treated with the OXP + 5FU regimen had significantly less metastatic progression (OR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.94; p = 0.007). Considering adverse events (AEs), there was more grade 3–4 diarrhea with OXP + 5FU (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.74–3.32, p < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences grade 3–4 hematologic AEs (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.87–1.57, p = 0.31). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis with long-term results from the randomized studies showed a benefit of the addition of OXP + 5FU regiment in terms of DFS, metastatic progression, and pCR rate that did not translate to improved OS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 4319-4336 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hoendervangers ◽  
J. P. M. Burbach ◽  
M. M. Lacle ◽  
M. Koopman ◽  
W. M. U. van Grevenstein ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is associated with better survival, less local recurrence, and less distant failure. Furthermore, pCR indicates that the rectum may have been preserved. This meta-analysis gives an overview of available neoadjuvant treatment strategies for LARC and analyzes how these perform in achieving pCR as compared with the standard of care. Methods Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Central bibliographic databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials in which patients received neoadjuvant treatment for MRI-staged nonmetastatic resectable LARC were included. The primary outcome was pCR, defined as ypT0N0. A meta-analysis of studies comparing an intervention with standard fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation (CRT) was performed. Results Of the 17 articles included in the systematic review, 11 were used for the meta-analysis. Addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based CRT resulted in significantly more pCR compared with fluoropyrimidine-based CRT only (OR 1.46), but at the expense of more ≥ grade 3 toxicity. Other treatment strategies, including consolidation/induction chemotherapy and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), did not improve pCR rates. None of the included trials reported a benefit in local control or OS. Five-year DFS was significantly worse after SCRT-delay compared with CRT (59% vs. 75.1%, HR 1.93). Conclusions All included trials fail to deliver high-level evidence to show an improvement in pCR compared with standard fluoropyrimidine-based CRT. The addition of oxaliplatin might result in more pCR but at the expense of more toxicity. Furthermore, this benefit does not translate into less local recurrence or improved survival.


2005 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 286-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Chao ◽  
Peter Gibbs ◽  
Joe Tjandra ◽  
Mark Cullinan ◽  
Stephen McLaughlin ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document