scholarly journals Breast Cancer Risk by Breast Density, Menopause, and Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy Use

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (24) ◽  
pp. 3830-3837 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla Kerlikowske ◽  
Andrea J. Cook ◽  
Diana S.M. Buist ◽  
Steve R. Cummings ◽  
Celine Vachon ◽  
...  

Purpose We determined whether the association between breast density and breast cancer risk and cancer severity differs according to menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) use. Methods We collected data on 587,369 women who underwent 1,349,027 screening mammography examinations; 14,090 women were diagnosed with breast cancer. We calculated 5-year breast cancer risk from a survival model for subgroups of women classified by their Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) breast density, age, menopausal status, and current HT use, assuming a body mass index of 25 kg/m2. Odds of advanced (ie, IIb, III, IV) versus early (ie, I, IIa) stage invasive cancer was calculated according to BIRADS density. Results Breast cancer risk was low among women with low density (BIRADS-1): women age 55 to 59 years, 5-year risk was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.6 to 0.9%) for non-HT users and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.7% to 1.1%) for estrogen and estrogen plus progestin users. Breast cancer risk was high among women with very high density (BIRADS-4), particularly estrogen plus progestin users: women age 55 to 59 years, 5-year risk was 2.4% (95% CI, 2.0% to 2.8%) for non-HT users, 3.0% (95% CI, 2.6% to 3.5%) for estrogen users, and 4.2% (95% CI, 3.7% to 4.6%) for estrogen plus progestin users. Advanced-stage breast cancer risk was increased 1.7-fold for postmenopausal HT users who had very high density (BIRADS-4) compared to those with average density (BIRADS-2). Conclusion Postmenopausal women with high breast density are at increased risk of breast cancer and should be aware of the added risk of taking HT, especially estrogen plus progestin.

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shanshan Zhao ◽  
Rowan T Chlebowski ◽  
Garnet L Anderson ◽  
Lewis H Kuller ◽  
JoAnn E Manson ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 1285-1291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sulggi Lee ◽  
Laurence Kolonel ◽  
Lynne Wilkens ◽  
Peggy Wan ◽  
Brian Henderson ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 3917-3925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jian Ni ◽  
Tian-Song Xia ◽  
Ying-Chun Zhao ◽  
Jing-Jing Ma ◽  
Jie Zhao ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 2710
Author(s):  
Eleni Leventea ◽  
Elaine F. Harkness ◽  
Adam R. Brentnall ◽  
Anthony Howell ◽  
D. Gareth Evans ◽  
...  

Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) has an attenuated effect on breast cancer (BC) risk amongst heavier women, but there are few data on a potential interaction with early adulthood body mass index (at age 20 years) and age of first pregnancy. We studied 56,489 women recruited to the PROCAS (Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening) study in Manchester UK, 2009-15. Cox regression models estimated the effect of reported MHT use at entry on breast cancer (BC) risk, and potential interactions with a. self-reported current body mass index (BMI), b. BMI aged 20 and c. First pregnancy >30 years or nulliparity compared with first pregnancy <30 years. Analysis was adjusted for age, height, family history, age of menarche and menopause, menopausal status, oophorectomy, ethnicity, self-reported exercise and alcohol. With median follow up of 8 years, 1663 breast cancers occurred. BC risk was elevated amongst current users of combined MHT compared to never users (Hazard ratioHR 1.64, 95% CI 1.32–2.03), risk was higher than for oestrogen only users (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.79–1.34). Risk of current MHT was attenuated by current BMI (interaction HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65–0.99) per 5 unit increase in BMI. There was little evidence of an interaction between MHT use, breast cancer risk and early and current BMI or with age of first pregnancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document