Prelimenary results of a phase I/II of a combination of cetuximab and taxane for triple negative breast cancer patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12018-e12018
Author(s):  
H. Nechushtan ◽  
H. Steinberg ◽  
T. Peretz

e12018 Background: The triple negative subtype of breast cancer is currently only treated with chemotherapeutic agents. It has been demonstrated that over 50% of this kind of tumors express EGFR (HER-1). Cetuximab is a humanized antiEGFR IgG1 antibody. In colon cancer there are also high percentage of EGFR expression and addition of Cetuximab to chemotherapy results in renewed sensitivity to treatments. We therefore hypothesized that in a similar manner addition of Cetuximab to taxanes which are among the most potent anti breast cancer drugs will result in increased effectiveness in this subset of breast cancer patients. Methods: From January 2007 to January 2009, we treated 12 breast cancer patients with either paclitaxel 80 mg/m2, (10 patients) or docetaxel (30 mg mg/m2) (2 patients), with cetuximab weekly. Patients had a pathology sample of breast cancer with triple negative components, metastatic disease and up to two prior chemotherapy lines in the metastatic settings. Results: Patient characteristics (median): age 60 (31–69) years, prior taxane therapy 9/12 pts. Toxicity: Dermatologic grade 2 9/12 grade 3 3/12, nail disease grade 2 10/12 evaluable patients. One patient developed severe swallowing difficulties after 19 month of therapy which may or may not be linked to the treatment. Response is evaluable for 11/12 patients. Response which includes clinical response, tumor marker decrease, and a metastasis size decrease was noted in 9/11 patients. Including tumor marker normalization and nearly a roentgoenolgic CR in a young patient previously treated with several chemeotherapietic lines. Three patients developed brain metastasis during treatments. Molecular pathology is now performed. We continue accrual. Conclusions: Administration of taxane-cetuximab weekly therapy for triple negative breast cancer patients is possible. Toxicity is the cumulated expected toxicity of each of the agents — special care should be taken for nail disease which occurred in most of the patients. Some impressive clinical responses were obtained even in taxane pretreated patients. [Table: see text]

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1071-1071
Author(s):  
Anantbhushan Ranade ◽  
Kanaka Govind Babu ◽  
Purvish M. Parikh ◽  
Jk Singh ◽  
Manisha Singh ◽  
...  

1071 Background: Metronomic chemotherapy regimens have shown efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer by antiangiogenic mechanisms. When used metronomically the toxicity profile of capecitabine is low. Triple negative breast cancer is a common problem in India and developing countries. Approximately 30% of triple negative breast cancer express EGFR and its mutation. Methods: Since October 2003 to December 2011 we objectively tested response rates, clinical benefit, and safety of gefitinib and capecitabine administered with a metronomic schedule of 500 mg thrice daily in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients with gefitinib 250 mg once daily. 300 patients were screened for EGFR expression. Among 85 enrolled patients with EGFR positivity, 76 were evaluable. ECOG performance status (PS) was 0-2, median age 52 years (range 36-65), bone plus visceral metastasis in 40% of patients. Rest had only visceral metastasis. All the patients were pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes. The combination was administered for a median duration of 32 weeks (range 12-166). Results: We observed 18 partial responses (PR: 24%), 42 (55%) stable disease (SD). Median time to progression was 53 weeks, (95% CI, range 12-166 weeks). Safety of metronomic capecitabine with gefitinib was excellent. Neither grade 2-4 haematological or clinical side effects were recorded. Only 12 patients experienced grade I (WHO) hand-foot syndrome. Conclusions: Treatment with metronomic capecitabine and gefitinib was effective and minimally toxic in heavily pretreated breast cancer patients.


Breast Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Rudolf Napieralski ◽  
Gabriele Schricker ◽  
Gert Auer ◽  
Michaela Aubele ◽  
Jonathan Perkins ◽  
...  

<b><i>Background:</i></b> PITX2 DNA methylation has been shown to predict outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients after anthracycline-based chemotherapy. To determine its prognostic versus predictive value, the impact of PITX2 DNA methylation on outcomes was studied in an untreated cohort vs. an anthracycline-treated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cohort. <b><i>Material and Methods:</i></b> The percent DNA methylation ratio (PMR) of paired-like homeodomain transcription factor 2 (PITX2) was determined by a validated methylation-specific real-time PCR test. Patient samples of routinely collected archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue and clinical data from 144 TNBC patients of 2 independent cohorts (i.e., 66 untreated patients and 78 patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy) were analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The risk of 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) increased continuously with rising PITX2 DNA methylation in the anthracycline-treated population, but it increased only slightly during 10-year follow-up time in the untreated patient population. PITX2 DNA methylation with a PMR cutoff of 2 did not show significance for poor vs. good outcomes (OS) in the untreated patient cohort (HR = 1.55; <i>p</i> = 0.259). In contrast, the PITX2 PMR cutoff of 2 identified patients with poor (PMR &#x3e;2) vs. good (PMR ≤2) outcomes (OS) with statistical significance in the anthracycline-treated cohort (HR = 3.96; <i>p</i> = 0.011). The results in the subgroup of patients who did receive anthracyclines only (no taxanes) confirmed this finding (HR = 5.71; <i>p</i> = 0.014). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> In this hypothesis-generating study PITX2 DNA methylation demonstrated predominantly predictive value in anthracycline treatment in TNBC patients. The risk of poor outcome (OS) correlates with increasing PITX2 DNA methylation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S43-S44
Author(s):  
K.S. Harborg ◽  
R. Zachariae ◽  
J. Olsen ◽  
M. Johannsen ◽  
D. Cronin-Fenton ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document