Significance of the expression of thymidylate synthase in prostate cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16163-e16163
Author(s):  
Y. Mizutani ◽  
Y. Li ◽  
T. Shiraishi ◽  
T. Nakamura ◽  
K. Mikami ◽  
...  

e16163 Background: Thymidylate synthase ( TS ) is an important enzyme in de novo DNA synthesis pathway. 5-Fluorouracil ( 5-FU ), an anticancer chemotherapeutic agent used clinically against a variety of cancers including prostate cancer, inhibits DNA synthesis by binding TS. In the present study, we examined TS expression in prostate cancer and investigated its prognostic significance. Methods: Fifty-two prostate cancer tissue specimens were obtained from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. Forty-eight prostate cancer tissue specimens were also obtained from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy. We examined prostate cancer tissue and normal prostate tissue for TS expression by immunohistochemistry. Results: TS was expressed at higher levels in prostate cancer without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, compared with normal prostate.TS expression in stage T3 prostate cancer was higher than that in stage T2 prostate cancer. In addition, the level of TS expression in Gleason score 7 or greater prostate cancer was higher than that in Gleason score less than 7 prostate cancer. Patients with prostate cancer with negative TS expression without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy had a longer postoperative recurrence-free rate than those with positive expression in the 5 year follow-up. In addition, patients with Gleason score less than 7 prostate cancer with negative TS expression had a much longer postoperative recurrence-free rate than those with positive expression in the 5-year follow-up. TS expression was significantly decreased in prostate cancer patients who received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, especially stage T2 prostate cancer patients. Conclusions: The current study has demonstrated for the first time that TS expression may be a prognostic parameterr for prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Urology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 609-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideaki Miyake ◽  
Mototsugu Muramaki ◽  
Toshifumi Kurahashi ◽  
Kazuki Yamanaka ◽  
Isao Hara ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 559-564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuaki Sato ◽  
Masaki Shiota ◽  
Ken-ichiro Shiga ◽  
Eiji Kashiwagi ◽  
Ario Takeuchi ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e034612
Author(s):  
Athul John ◽  
Michael O'Callaghan ◽  
Rick Catterwell ◽  
Luke A Selth

IntroductionPositive surgical margins (PSM) in cancer patients are commonly associated with worse prognosis and a higher risk of secondary treatment. However, the relevance of this parameter in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial, given the inconsistencies in its ability to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) and oncological outcomes. Hence, further assessment of the utility of surgical margins for prostate cancer prognosis is required to predict these outcomes more accurately. Over the last decade, studies have used the Gleason score (GS) of positive margins to predict outcomes. Herein, the authors aim to conduct a systematic review investigating the role of GS of PSM after radical prostatectomy in predicting BCR and oncological outcomes.Methods and analysisWe will perform a search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and COCHRANE databases. The review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We will screen titles and abstracts to select articles appropriate for full-text review. Studies discussing GS of PSM after RP will be included. Given the change in reporting of GS, only articles from 2005 to 2019 will be included. The quality of the studies chosen will be assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa tool for non-randomised and Cochrane risk of bias for randomised control studies. We will adopt the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation framework to comment on quality of cumulative evidence. The primary outcome measure will be time to BCR. Secondary outcome measures include secondary treatment, disease-specific survival, disease progression-free and overall mortality at follow-up period. We aim to perform a meta-analysis if the level of heterogeneity is acceptable (I2<50%).Ethics and disseminationThe review does not require ethics approval as it is a review of published literature. The findings of the review will be submitted for peer-reviewed publications and presented at scientific meetings.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019131800.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document