HIF expression and Max-SUV-18F-FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22010-e22010
Author(s):  
R. Lopez ◽  
E. Gallardo ◽  
A. Ruibal ◽  
L. Leon ◽  
A. Sanchez-Salmon ◽  
...  

e22010 Background: Tumor hipoxia induces the up-regulation of several genes via the hipoxia-inducible transcription factors (HIF) 1 and 2. HIF-2 alpha (HIF-2 α) and HIF-1 alpha (HIF-1α) are associated with the prognosis of operable NSCLC patients. We studied the immunohistochemical expression of HIF-1α and HIF-2 α in patients with NSCLC and the possible correlation with the maximum standardised uptake value (max SUV) of 18F-FDG as well as other biological parameters. Methods: We used a Tissue Arrayer device (Beecher Instruments. WI) to construct a TMA block, according to conventional protocols for the study of immunohistochemical expression of HIF-1α, HIF-2 α, EGFR, bcl-2, MIB1, p16, p63 and cyclins A, B1, D1 and D3. Sections were scored as positive if >10% of cells stained positively. Staining patterns were correlated to clinical variables. Results: HIF- 1α expression was observed in 84/96 patients (34/39 adenocarcinomas and 50/57 squamous cell carcinomas), however it did not correlate with clinical stage (I-II: 41/45 vs III-IV: 44/51). HIF-1α correlated positively with HIF-2 α (p:0,001) and EGFR (p:<0,001) expressions. The maxSUV values of 18F-FDG-PET were higher (p:0,039) in HIF-1α -positive (17,1±8,6) than in negative tumors (11,8±4,4). HIF-2 α expression was observed in 60/103 cases (27/42 adenocarcinomas and 33/61 squamous cell carcinomas) and it did not correlate with clinical stage ((I-II: 28/45 vs III-IV: 32/57). HIF-2 α correlated positively with HIF-1α (p:0,001), MIB1 (p:0,045) and EGFR (p:0,091) expressions. After multivariate analysis, only the clinical stage (RR: 2,2) was a prognostic factor. Conclusions: 1) HIF-1α and HIF-2 α expressions are frequent in patients with NSCLCs and it did not correlate with clinical stage; 2) maxSUVs FDG-PET values were higher in HIF1alpha positive than in HIF-1α negative patients; 3) HIF-1α was correlated with EGFR expression, while HIF-2 α was correlated with MIB1 expression. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 687-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoda Anwar ◽  
Thomas J. Vogl ◽  
Mahasen A. Abougabal ◽  
Frank Grünwald ◽  
Peter Kleine ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Weibo Wen ◽  
Yongnan Piao ◽  
Dongyuan Xu ◽  
Xiangdan Li

Purpose. The present systematic literature review and meta-analysis focused on examining the significance of total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in predicting the prognosis of stages I/II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on 18F-FDG PET parameters. Methods. Electronic databases, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE, were comprehensively searched for retrieving relevant articles published in the English language. Furthermore, the significance of TLG and MTV in prognosis prediction was analyzed by pooled hazard ratios (HRs). Results. This work enrolled eight primary studies with 1292 I/II-stage NSCLC cases. The pooled HR (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the ability of increased TLG to predict progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.02 (1.30–2.13) ( P = 0.350 ), while for increased MTV it was 3.04 (1.92–4.81) ( P = 0.793 ). In addition, the pooled HR (95% CI) for the ability of increased TLG to predict overall survival (OS) was 2.16 (1.49–3.14) ( P = 0.624 ). However, higher MTV correlated with OS, and sensitivity analysis showed that the results were not stable. Multivariate and univariate analyses by subgroup analyses stratified by PFS of MTV and OS of TLG exhibited statistically significant differences, without any statistical heterogeneity across various articles. Conclusion. The present work suggests the predictive value of PET/CT among stage I and II NSCLC patients. Our results verified that stage I/II NSCLC cases with increased TLG and MTV had a higher risk of side reactions, and TLG is related to increased mortality risk.


2009 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-108
Author(s):  
D.R. Camisasca ◽  
F.L. Dias ◽  
P.A.S. Faria ◽  
D.A. Pereira ◽  
G. Alves ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (16_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4504-4504 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. de Wit ◽  
M. Hartmann ◽  
J. Kotzerke ◽  
M. Wirth ◽  
W. Brenner ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21087-e21087 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Areses ◽  
U. Anido ◽  
A. Ruibal ◽  
I. Abdulkader ◽  
F. Gude ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 1111-1119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Hyeon Gu ◽  
Dae Young Yoon ◽  
Chan Hee Park ◽  
Suk Ki Chang ◽  
Kyoung Ja Lim ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 1665-1670 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. K. van Dijk ◽  
O. C. Boerman ◽  
G. M. Franssen ◽  
J. Lok ◽  
J. H. A. M. Kaanders ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document