Differential outcomes in patients treated with endocrine therapy for early or locally advanced breast cancer based on BRCA mutation status

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22065-e22065 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wesolowski ◽  
A. G. Shealy ◽  
J. Tao ◽  
H. C. Moore

e22065 Background: Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes lead to defects in DNA repair. Estrogen receptor modulates transcription of genes responsible for cell division, which depends on cell's ability to repair DNA for genomic integrity. Differential efficacy of endocrine therapy for breast cancer, therefore, may be possible depending on the tumor's BRCA mutation status. Methods: Through an IRB approved registry, breast cancer patients tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and treated with endocrine therapy for hormone-receptor positive non-metastatic disease were identified. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) respectively. Fisher's exact test or Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to assess differences among subgroups with respect to their characteristics. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to identify univariate and multivariate risk factors for OS and PFS. Results: Of 115 breast cancer patients tested for BRCA mutations, 63 met the inclusion criteria of whom 16 patients were BRCA 1 or 2 mutation positive and 47 were negative. In the BRCA(+) group, 14 patients (87.5%) had stage I-III disease at diagnosis. In the BRCA(-) group, 5 patients (10.6%) had stage 0 disease while 41 patients (87.2%) had stage I-III disease at diagnosis. Stage at diagnosis was unavailable for 2 BRCA(+) and 1 BRCA(-) patients. Both groups were similar with respect to Her-2 expression status, history of ovarian suppression, age of diagnosis, and age of menopause. Median age was 48 yo in BRCA(+) group, 42 yo in BRCA(-), (p=0.12). Median follow up was 76.1 mos in BRCA(+) and 62.9 mos in BRCA(-) group. OS was worse in BRCA(+) group (HR 7.38, 95% [CI] 1.49–36.4 p=0.014). After adjustment for stage and history of ovarian suppression, the difference remained significant (HR 16.6, 95% [CI] 1.95–142, p=0.010). There was no difference in PFS (HR 2.02, 95% [CI] 0.82–4.96, p=0.13). Conclusions: Patients with BRCA mutation, hormone-receptor positive hereditary breast cancer treated with endocrine therapy had inferior survival compared with similar patients who are BRCA mutation negative. Prospective studies to evaluate the differential effects of endocrine therapy in these populations are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2014 ◽  
Vol 50 (13) ◽  
pp. 2190-2200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Duveken B.Y. Fontein ◽  
Ayoub Charehbili ◽  
Johan W.R. Nortier ◽  
Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg ◽  
Judith R. Kroep ◽  
...  

Breast Cancer ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisuke Shimizu ◽  
Takashi Ishikawa ◽  
Mikiko Tanabe ◽  
Takeshi Sasaki ◽  
Yasushi Ichikawa ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1054-1054 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay Dhakal ◽  
Christina Matthews ◽  
Fan Zhang ◽  
Ellis Glenn Levine ◽  
Stephen B. Edge ◽  
...  

1054 Background: Resistance mechanisms to CDK 4/6 inhibition are not well defined. Outcome data on hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer patients (MBCP) treated with palbociclib (PA) after treatment with everolimus (EV) are lacking. The PALOMA 3 trial (P3) showing benefit of PA plus fulvestrant (FU) compared to FU in HR+ MBCP after progression on endocrine therapy excluded women previously treated with EV. The aim of our study was to investigate the outcomes of HR+ MBCP with prior EV treatment on PA based therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective, single institute review of HR+, HER 2 nonamplified MBCP from Jan 2014 - Nov 2016 treated with PA after treatment with EV. Women who received EV for < 1 month or PA < 14 days were excluded. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the initiation of PA to the date of progression as determined by treating physician based on radiological, biochemical and/or clinical criteria. Response rates were determined based on available radiological data. Clinical benefit was defined as a complete response (CR), partial response (PR) or stable disease of at least 24 weeks. Results: 23 patients with mean age 67 years (42 to 81) were identified. 95% were postmenopausal, 81% had ECOG performance status 0 or 1, 83% had visceral metastases, 95% had > 2 lines of prior endocrine therapy (ET), 82% shown prior sensitivity to ET, 82% received prior chemotherapy, of which 84% were in metastatic setting. Kaplan Meier estimate showed median PFS of 2.9 months (95% CI 2.0-4.2); median PFS of P3 PA cohort was 9.5 months (95% CI 9.2-11.0). Fisher’s exact test comparing study cohort with P3 PA cohort showed statistically significant differences in objective response (CR or PR) rates of 0/23 (0%) vs. 66/347 (19%, p = 0.02) & clinical benefit ratio of 4/23 (17.4%) vs. 231/347 (66.5%, p = 0.00). Conclusions: Outcomes with PA in HR+ EV treated MBCP were worse when compared to the P3 PA cohort data. Treatment with EV may lead to resistance to CDK inhibition. Though limited by size, our data suggests that use of PA after EV is associated with low response & clinical benefit rates. Further studies are necessary to confirm the findings to determine sequencing of targeted therapies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document