A randomized trial comparing local recurrence (LR) rates between short-course (SC) and long-course (LC) preoperative radiotherapy (RT) for clinical T3 rectal cancer: An intergroup trial (TROG, AGITG, CSSANZ, RACS).

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3509-3509 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ngan ◽  
R. Fisher ◽  
D. Goldstein ◽  
M. Solomon ◽  
B. Burmeister ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 226
Author(s):  
Karolina Vernmark ◽  
Xiao-Feng Sun ◽  
Annica Holmqvist

There is a need to personalize the treatment for rectal cancer patients. The aim of this study was to analyze therapy response and prognosis after preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma compared to those with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma. The study included retrospectively collected data from 433 patients, diagnosed with rectal cancer in the South East health care region in Sweden between 2004 and 2012. Patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma that received short-course radiotherapy before surgery had better overall survival, cancer specific survival, and disease-free survival, as well as distant- and local-recurrence-free survival (p = 0.003, p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.002, and p = 0.033, respectively) compared to the patients that received long-course radiotherapy with concomitant capecitabine. The results were still significant after adjusting for sex, age, stage, differentiation, and chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant setting, except for local-recurrence-free survival that was trending towards significance (p = 0.070). In patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma, no difference in survival was seen when comparing patients that had short-course radiotherapy and patients that had long-course radiotherapy. However, none of 18 patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma treated with long-course radiotherapy had local tumor progression, compared to 7% of 67 patients with non-mucinous adenocarcinoma. The results indicate that mucinous adenocarcinoma and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma may respond differently to radiotherapy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (31) ◽  
pp. 3827-3833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Y. Ngan ◽  
Bryan Burmeister ◽  
Richard J. Fisher ◽  
Michael Solomon ◽  
David Goldstein ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare the local recurrence (LR) rate between short-course (SC) and long-course (LC) neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Patients and Methods Eligible patients had ultrasound- or magnetic resonance imaging–staged T3N0-2M0 rectal adenocarcinoma within 12 cm from anal verge. SC consisted of pelvic radiotherapy 5 × 5 Gy in 1 week, early surgery, and six courses of adjuvant chemotherapy. LC was 50.4 Gy, 1.8 Gy/fraction, in 5.5 weeks, with continuous infusional fluorouracil 225 mg/m2 per day, surgery in 4 to 6 weeks, and four courses of chemotherapy. Results Three hundred twenty-six patients were randomly assigned; 163 patients to SC and 163 to LC. Median potential follow-up time was 5.9 years (range, 3.0 to 7.8 years). Three-year LR rates (cumulative incidence) were 7.5% for SC and 4.4% for LC (difference, 3.1%; 95% CI, −2.1 to 8.3; P = .24). For distal tumors (< 5 cm), six of 48 SC patients and one of 31 LC patients experienced local recurrence (P = .21). Five-year distant recurrence rates were 27% for SC and 30% for LC (log-rank P = 0.92; hazard ratio [HR] for LC:SC, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.56). Overall survival rates at 5 years were 74% for SC and 70% for LC (log-rank P = 0.62; HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.67). Late toxicity rates were not substantially different (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer G3-4: SC, 5.8%; LC, 8.2%; P = .53). Conclusion Three-year LR rates between SC and LC were not statistically significantly different; the CI for the difference is consistent with either no clinically important difference or differences in favor of LC. LC may be more effective in reducing LR for distal tumors. No differences in rates of distant recurrence, relapse-free survival, overall survival, or late toxicity were detected.


2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1723-1727
Author(s):  
Naohito Beppu ◽  
Ryo Okamoto ◽  
Yoshihiko Nakamoto ◽  
Fumihiko Kimura ◽  
Masataka Ikeda ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (14) ◽  
pp. 5755-5762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-Xin Liu ◽  
Zhi-Rui Zhou ◽  
Ling-Xiao Chen ◽  
Yong-Jing Yang ◽  
Zhi-De Hu ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayu Santika Santaningrum ◽  
Fenny Tjuatja ◽  
Giovano Andika Pradana ◽  
Hari Murti Wijaya ◽  
Jellyca Anton ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. e93-e99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisette M. Wiltink ◽  
Remi A. Nout ◽  
Jochem R.N. van der Voort van Zyp ◽  
Heleen M. Ceha ◽  
Marta Fiocco ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document