Survival after primary liver resection in metastatic colorectal cancer: A comparative analysis of the LICC trial with historical controls (FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial and EORTC Intergroup trial 40983).

e15019 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients (pts) with liver-limited disease (LLD) have a chance of long-term survival and cure after hepatic metastasectomy. The optimal treatment after primary liver resection remains controversial. Here we compare results from the LICC trial with historical controls, the FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial (FFCD; Portier et al., 2006) and the EORTC Intergroup trial 40983 (EORTC; Nordlinger et al., 2008, 2013). The three trials investigated pts with mCRC LLD who underwent primary hepatic resection. Methods: LICC, FFCD and EORTC were compared regarding pts characteristics, treatment, surveillance and efficacy outcomes. LICC pts received the adjuvant antigen-specific cancer vaccine tecemotide (L-BLP25) or placebo after primary LLD resection for up to 2 years. The FFCD trial compared postoperative 5-FU/leucovorin and the EORTC trial perioperative FOLFOX versus surgery alone. Results: Primary resected pts in LICC (n = 80; R0 n = 76), FFCD (R0 n = 171; postoperative chemotherapy n = 86) and EORTC (n = 364) showed different pt characteristics concerning median age (60, 63 and 63 years) and rate of synchronous metastases (46.8%, 27.9% and 34.0%). In LICC, > 5 liver metastases were resected in 11.6% of pts, in FFCD and EORTC all eligible pts had < 5 liver metastases resected. In contrast to EORTC, LICC and FFCD had a close surveillance until recurrence or a maximum of 2 years. Median OS (mOS) in LICC was not yet estimable in primary resected pts (tecemotide arm: 62.8 months; placebo arm: not yet estimable). In the FFCD and the EORTC trial, mOS was 62.1 and 61.3 months, respectively. Further details will be presented. Conclusions: Despite unfavorable disease characteristic in LICC compared with the earlier EORTC and FFCD studies, primary liver resection without adjuvant chemotherapy led to surprisingly good survival outcomes. Improvements in imaging-based pt selection and liver resection techniques might in part explain our finding. Surgery alone appears to be an option for selected pts with resectable LLD. Better systemic chemo(immune-)therapy may have also contributed to the OS benefit. Clinical trial information: LICC: NCT01462513; EORTC: NCT00006479; FFCD: not registered.

Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Epirubicin, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil Compared With Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy With Fluorouracil and Leucovorin After Curative Resection of Gastric Cancer: Results From CALGB 80101 (Alliance)

Purpose After curative resection of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, Intergroup Trial 0116 (Phase III trial of postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy for high risk gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Demonstrated superior survival for patients who received postoperative chemoradiotherapy with bolus fluorouracil (FU) and leucovorin (LV) compared with surgery alone. CALGB 80101 (Alliance; Phase III Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Chemoradiation After Resection of Gastric or Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma) assessed whether a postoperative chemoradiotherapy regimen that replaced FU plus LV with a potentially more active systemic therapy could further improve overall survival. Patients and Methods Between April 2002 and May 2009, 546 patients who had undergone a curative resection of stage IB through IV (M0) gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative FU plus LV before and after combined FU and radiotherapy (FU plus LV arm) or postoperative epirubicin, cisplatin, and infusional FU (ECF) before and after combined FU and radiotherapy (ECF arm). Results With a median follow-up duration of 6.5 years, 5-year overall survival rates were 44% in the FU plus LV arm and 44% in the ECF arm ( Plogrank = .69; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.24 comparing ECF with FU plus LV). Five-year disease-free survival rates were 39% in the FU plus LV arm and 37% in the ECF arm ( Plogrank = .94; multivariable hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.20). In post hoc analyses, the effect of treatment seemed to be similar across all examined patient subgroups. Conclusion After a curative resection of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, postoperative chemoradiotherapy using a multiagent regimen of ECF before and after radiotherapy does not improve survival compared with standard FU and LV before and after radiotherapy.