Lobular neoplasia on core biopsy: Is excision always indicated?

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 75-75
Author(s):  
C. A. Makarewich ◽  
K. M. Rosenkranz
Keyword(s):  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Incidental Finding ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Excisional Biopsy ◽  
Invasive Disease ◽  
Lobular Neoplasia ◽  
Occult Malignancy

75 Background: Lobular neoplasia (LN) is a continuum of rare, noninvasive lesions of the breast including lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical lobular hyperplasia. Current management is controversial and often includes excisional biopsy in women diagnosed with LN on percutaneous core biopsy (PCB) to exclude an occult malignancy. This strategy is based on retrospective data in women undergoing selective excisions. We performed routine excision of all lesions diagnosed as LN in our institution in order to ascertain a more accurate assessment of pathologic upgrade. Methods: Retrospective review of all prospectively collected cases of LN treated in a single institution from 2007-2010. Excisional biopsies were performed in all cases of LN excepting one (patient declined). Histologic findings of excisional biopsies were reviewed to assess the rate of pathologic upgrade. Results: Of the 2,289 PCBs performed during the study period, LN was found in 23 cases (1.0%). Twenty two (0.96%) cases proceeded to excisional biopsy. On final pathology, malignancy was found in 4 patients (18%). Two of 22 (9%) women were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (both intermediate grade with foci of <1mm and 4mm) and 2/22 (9%) women were diagnosed with invasive lobular carcinoma. Conclusions: While 18% of women in our series had upgraded pathology at the time of excisional biopsy, we support selective rather than routine excisional biopsy. One of the invasive diagnoses was an incidental finding unrelated to the microcalcifications for which biopsy was initially performed. In the second case of invasive disease, the upgraded lesion was a mass identified on MRI performed for surgical planning in a woman already diagnosed with breast cancer. In both cases of DCIS, the area of malignancy was small (<1mm and 4mm) and of uncertain clinical significance. Based on these findings, we do not recommend routine excision of all LN identified on PCB. Cases in which the lesion is associated with a radiographic mass and/or is identified in a breast with a synchronous malignancy do warrant excisional biopsy. Patients without these high risk features can be counseled on the risks of malignancy and given the option of observation with close follow up.

Excisional Biopsy Should Be Performed if Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Is Seen on Needle Core Biopsy

2002 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 697-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra J. Shin ◽  
Paul Peter Rosen
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Invasive Carcinoma ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Excisional Biopsy ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Needle Core Biopsy

Abstract Context.—Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy is increasingly becoming the method of choice to evaluate impalpable breast lesions presenting with mammographically detected calcifications or as a mammographically detected mass. Infrequently, a diagnosis of a primary lobular lesion is rendered by needle core biopsy. Although lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) are not themselves detectable by mammography, they can be associated with calcifications. The management of patients with a primary diagnosis of LCIS or ALH on needle core biopsy is uncertain. Recommendations include excisional biopsy, tamoxifen citrate therapy, mammographic surveillance, or a combination of these approaches. Objective.—The purpose of this study was to report the histologic findings of excisional biopsies performed after ALH or LCIS was found in a needle core biopsy. Design.—Hematoxylin-eosin–stained slides of 20 needle core biopsy specimens from patients with a primary diagnosis of LCIS or ALH were retrieved from the consultation and surgical pathology files of New York Presbyterian Hospital–Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Histologic diagnoses were confirmed in all cases. Results.—Fourteen cases of primary LCIS and 6 cases of ALH found on needle core biopsy were identified. Subsequent excisional biopsy of the 14 LCIS cases revealed the following: LCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive carcinoma (1 patient; 7%); LCIS, infiltrating lobular carcinoma (1 patient; 7%); LCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ (1 patient; 7%); LCIS (8 patients; 57%); and ALH with or without atypical ductal hyperplasia (3 patients; 21%). Among the 6 patients with ALH on needle core biopsy, 1 had infiltrating lobular carcinoma and LCIS and 2 had LCIS in subsequent excision; other excisions for ALH were benign. Overall, 3 (21%) of 14 patients with a primary diagnosis of LCIS on needle core biopsy had a more significant lesion (ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive carcinoma) in a subsequent excisional biopsy. Conclusions.—Data obtained in this study and in previously published reports lead us to conclude that excisional biopsy may be indicated and should be considered when LCIS is found on needle core biopsy in order to more fully examine the biopsy site for coexistent, clinically inapparent intraductal or invasive carcinoma that may be present in about 25% of these patients. The small number of ALH cases studied produced inconclusive results. We recommend that excisional biopsy be considered if atypical ductal hyperplasia is present with ALH in a needle core biopsy or if the diagnosis of the biopsy specimen is discordant with the mammographic findings.

Ductal and lobular carcinoma in situ arising within an enlarging biopsy proven fibroadenoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e237017
Author(s):  
Yara Z Feliciano ◽  
Rochelle Freire ◽  
Jose Net ◽  
Monica Yepes
Keyword(s):  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Incidental Finding ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Current Case ◽  
Malignant Changes

The diagnosis via core needle biopsy of concurrent ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ within an enlarging previously biopsied benign fibroadenoma in women in their 40s is rare. Several case reports have described the occurrence of malignant changes within fibroadenomas, usually as an incidental finding following excision, and few reports have documented the transition of a fibroadenoma to malignancy. The current case report emphasises the importance of re-biopsying enlarging fibroadenomas, even with otherwise maintained benign appearing features on imaging, in women in their 40s, in order to exclude the possibility of malignancy.

Advocating Nonsurgical Management of Patients With Small, Incidental Radial Scars at the Time of Needle Core Biopsy: A Study of 77 Cases

2015 ◽  
Vol 139 (9) ◽  
pp. 1137-1142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathleen Matrai ◽  
Timothy M. D'Alfonso ◽  
Lindsay Pharmer ◽  
Michele B. Drotman ◽  
Rache M. Simmons ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Invasive Carcinoma ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Radial Scar ◽  
Needle Core Biopsy ◽  
Ductal Hyperplasia

Context Radial scars are benign sclerosing lesions that are routinely excised when diagnosed in a needle core biopsy. Optimal management for patients with incidental and small (≤5 mm) radial scars is uncertain. Objective To assess pathologic upgrade of radial scars diagnosed in needle core biopsy samples and identify a subset of patients who could benefit from conservative management. Design Patients with a diagnosis of radial scar in a needle core biopsy who underwent excision of the biopsied area were identified. Radial scars greater than 5 mm in size and those with coexisting atypia, carcinoma, and papillary lesions were excluded. After histologic-radiographic correlation, rates of pathologic upgrade were assessed. Results Seventy-seven radial scars diagnosed in 66 patients were included. Overall, 9 of 77 (12%) showed upgrade to a high-risk lesion (6 lobular carcinoma in situ, 2 atypical ductal hyperplasia, 1 atypical lobular hyperplasia), while none (0%) showed upgrade to invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ. One of 22 incidental radial scars (4.5%) showed upgrade on excision versus 6 of 36 (16.7%) for radial scars considered to be the radiographic target (P = .23). Older age was associated with upgrade (P &lt; .001). Conclusions No incidental or small (≤5 mm) radial scars excised revealed invasive carcinoma or ductal carcinoma in situ on excision. Provided there is good pathologic-radiologic concordance, it appears reasonable for these patients to be managed conservatively.

Lobular Neoplasia of the Breast: An Update

2009 ◽  
Vol 133 (7) ◽  
pp. 1116-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Contreras ◽  
Husain Sattar
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Lobular Neoplasia ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Molecular Studies ◽  
Pleomorphic Lobular Carcinoma

Abstract Context.—Lobular neoplasias (LNs) of the breast include atypical lobular neoplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ. Recent evidence suggests that LN is not only a risk factor for invasive lobular carcinoma, but is also a nonobligate precursor. Pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (PLCIS) is a subtype of LN that has high-grade nuclei and other features that may mimic high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. The management and follow-up of patients diagnosed with LN on core biopsy is a current issue of debate. However, recent genomic and molecular studies have identified candidate genes that may be important in understanding the pathogenesis of atypical lobular neoplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ, and thus may lead to other therapeutic interventions. Objective.—To review the literature on LN of the breast and discuss current issues in the diagnosis and management of this entity, with particular attention to the relatively newly recognized lesion PLCIS. Because the management of PLCIS varies from the other LN lesions, the recognition of PLCIS by the pathologist is necessary. Current issues in the molecular pathogenesis of LN are also presented. Data Sources.—Extensive review of the literature. Hematoxylin-eosin–stained and immunohistochemical-stained tissue from the author's personal collection. Conclusions.—Although morphology and immunohistochemical stains, such as E-cadherin, are important in the diagnosis and understanding of LN, genomic and molecular studies may guide the way these lesions are handled in the future. Recognizing PLCIS is important both for patient management and for our future understanding of LN pathogenesis.

Do Breast Columnar Cell Lesions with Atypia Need to be Excised?

2007 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 984-986
Author(s):  
Nicole Datrice ◽  
Navneet Narula ◽  
Melinda Maggard ◽  
John Butler ◽  
David Hsiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Core Biopsy ◽  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Excisional Biopsy ◽  
Columnar Cell ◽  
Columnar Cell Lesion ◽  
Simple Mastectomy ◽  
Abnormal Pathology

Columnar cell lesion with atypia (CCLA) is a newly recognized pathologic entity seen in breast specimens. The breast cancer risk associated with this finding is unclear, although CCLA had been found adjacent to both in situ and invasive carcinomas, but the incidence is unknown. Breast specimens from patients with a columnar cell lesion were reviewed by a pathologist for atypia. Twenty-one specimens with CCLA were identified [core biopsy (8), excisional biopsy (11), and simple mastectomy (2)]. Six of eight specimens with CCLA on core had adjacent abnormal pathology: infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC)/lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) (1), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)/LCIS (1), DCIS (1), LCIS (1), and papillomatosis (2). Five of 11 specimens with CCLA on excisional biopsy had adjacent abnormal pathology: IDC (3), DCIS/LCIS (1), and atypical ductal hyperplasia/papilloma (1). Two of two simple mastectomy specimens had CCLA associated with IDC (1) and DCIS (1). Overall, abnormal pathology was found adjacent to CCLA in 62 per cent of specimens (13/21). Breast pathologic specimens containing a columnar cell lesion should be carefully examined for atypia. Surgical excision is warranted for CCLA found on core biopsy. The future risk of breast cancer based on the finding of CCLA alone requires further investigation.

scholarly journals Factors Indicating Surgical Excision in Classical Type of Lobular Neoplasia of the Breast

Breast Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Constanze Elfgen ◽  
Christoph Tausch ◽  
Ann-Katrin Rodewald ◽  
Uwe Güth ◽  
Christoph Rageth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carcinoma In Situ ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Lobular Carcinoma ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Lobular Neoplasia ◽  
Classical Type

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Classical type of lobular neoplasia (LN) encompassing both atypical lobular hyperplasia and classical lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast is a lesion with uncertain malignant potential and has been the topic of several studies with conflicting outcome results. The aim of our study was to clarify outcome-relevant factors and treatment options of classical LN. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a pathological re-evaluation of the preoperative biopsy specimens and a retrospective clinical and radiological data analysis of 160 patients with LN from the Breast Center Zurich. Open surgery was performed in 65 patients, vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) in 79 patients, and surveillance after breast core needle biopsy (CNB) in 16 patients. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The upgrade rate into ductal carcinoma in situ/invasive cancer was the highest in case of imaging/histology discordance (40%). If the number of foci in the biopsy specimen was ≥3, the upgrade rate in the consecutive surgical specimens was increased (<i>p</i> = 0.01). The association of classical LN with histological microcalcification correlated with shortened disease-free survival (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.01), whereas other factors showed no impact on follow-up. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Surveillance or subsequent VAB after CNB of LN is sufficient in most cases. Careful consideration of individual radiological and histological factors is required to identify patients with a high risk of upgrade into malignancy. In those cases, surgical excision is indicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document