Prognostic significance of positive lymph node ratio in resected esophageal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 100-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Thota ◽  
T. Tashi ◽  
W. Gonsalves ◽  
A. R. Sama ◽  
P. T. Silberstein ◽  
...  

100 Background: Nodal involvement in esophageal cancer is associated with poor survival. We aim to determine whether the ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes (the lymph node ratio [LNR]) is a better predictor of survival as compared to the number of positive lymph nodes in resected esophageal cancer. Methods: 1,149 patients with resected esophageal cancer from 1995 to 2009 were identified from the VA Central Cancer Registry (VACCR) database. The patients were further characterized to 3 lymph node quartiles based on LNR and their median survivals were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Out of 1149 patients 26.4% patients (303) had squamous cell carcinoma and 73.6% (846) were of adenocarcinoma histology. Median age of diagnosis is 63 years. 353 (31%) are stage 1, 384 (33%) are stage 2, and 412 (36%) are stage 3. Majority of them 71% arise in lower third of esophagus followed by 13% in middle third, 4% in upper third and 12 % had unknown site of origin. The group was subdivided into 3 quartiles with 62.7% in LNR1 (0.0-0.1), 25.6% in LNR2 (0.1-0.5) and 11.7% in LNR3 (0.5-1.0). 13.7% had less than 2 nodes removed, 29.3% had 3-6 nodes and 57% had >7 nodes examined. 28% of them had tumor invading sub mucosa, 23.5% had tumor invading muscularis mucosa, 43.2% had involvement of adventitia and 5.3% had penetrating tumor at the time of diagnosis The 5 year survivals based on number of lymph nodes examined, number of positive lymph nodes and positive lymph node ratio are listed in the table. The median overall survival for resected esophageal cancer based on LNR quartiles was 37 vs 14 vs 11.5 months (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Number of positive lymph nodes and positive lymph node ratio correlated with survival outcomes but number of lymph nodes retrieved did not predict any survival differences. However LNR was a better predictor of survival when compared to number of positive nodes. Further validation of this observation needs to done in large multicenter studies. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Tumor Biology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 2335-2341 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nana Wang ◽  
Yibin Jia ◽  
Jianbo Wang ◽  
Xintong Wang ◽  
Cihang Bao ◽  
...  

Pancreatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. S114
Author(s):  
Stefan Kmezic ◽  
Ilija Pejovic ◽  
Andrija Antic ◽  
Vladimir Djordjevic ◽  
Radosava Racic-Arsovic ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Riaz Baqar ◽  
Simon Wilkins ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Karen Oliva ◽  
Paul McMurrick

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabiana Tonellotto ◽  
◽  
Anke Bergmann ◽  
Karen de Souza Abrahao ◽  
Suzana Sales de Aguiar ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 87-95
Author(s):  
Peter Widschwendter ◽  
Arkadius Polasik ◽  
Wolfgang Janni ◽  
Amelie de Gregorio ◽  
Thomas W.P. Friedl ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 371-371
Author(s):  
Christina Wai ◽  
Karthik Devarajan ◽  
John Parker Hoffman

371 Background: Previous studies evaluating lymph node status in pancreatic cancer have demonstrated that the ratio of positive nodes to total numbers resected is an important prognostic factor for survival. In our study we sought to see if the total number of nodes removed and lymph node ratio (LNR) would influence overall survival. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 210 patients from July 1998 to July 2011 who underwent resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma was done. Patients were evaluated for demographic information, neoadjuvant therapy status, surgical margins, pathological stage, total number of lymph nodes retrieved and the number of positive lymph nodes. The LNR was calculated by taking the number of positive lymph nodes to the total number of lymph nodes retrieved. The endpoint evaluated was overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 210 patients, 107 (51%) were male and 103 (49%) were female. The median age was 68. A total of 110 patients had 1 or more positive nodes. The median number of nodes evaluated for all patients was 15 (range 2-51) and the median number of positive lymph nodes was 1. In patients with positive lymph nodes, the median LNR was 0.15 or 15%. For the 210 patients, in univariate analysis, there was a statistically significant association between LNR and overall survival. When the LNR reached >11.2%, patient survival was worse (p=0.018). The total number of nodes removed was not significantly associated with OS for those with positive or negative nodes. However, with multivariable CART analysis, taking into account T stage and surgical margins, LNR had a significant impact on overall survival only for patients who had a R0 resection and T0-T2 disease. If there LNR was > 0, survival was better (p=0.043). Conclusions: In certain GI malignancies, complete evaluation of local lymph nodes is important and changes the survival of patients. In T0-T2 stage pancreatic cancer patients resected with negative margins, outcome is worse if there are positive nodes in these patients. Therefore based on our data, the LNR may be useful for determining the prognosis of early T stage cancer patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document