A first-in-human phase I study of CYH33, a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) α selective inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15645-e15645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Li Wei ◽  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Hongyun Zhao ◽  
Yang Zhang ◽  
Ben-Yan Zou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Pik3ca Mutation ◽  
Selective Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

e15645 Background: PI3Kα is the only subtype in PI3K family of which activated mutations occur frequently in tumors. CYH33 is a potent PI3Kα–selective inhibitor with anti-tumor activity in xenograft models. An open-label, Phase I dose-escalation & expansion study of CYH33 monotherapy (NCT03544905) is underway in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This study evaluates the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity of CYH33 administered daily orally in 28-day cycles until intolerable toxicity or disease progression (PD). Adult pts with advanced solid tumors who have progressed despite standard therapies are enrolled to this trial, and pts with or without PIK3CA mutant are eligible for dose-escalation and pts with PIK3CA mutant are eligible for dose-expansion. Results: As of the cut-off date 20 Dec 2019, 17 pts (median age 47.0 y) were enrolled in the first 6 dose levels (1mg, 5mg, 10mg, 20mg, 40mg and 60mg) of the dose-escalation cohorts, and 3 pts were enrolled in expansion cohort of 40 mg. Cohorts 1 mg to 20 mg were completed without dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), cohort 40mg was completed with 1 DLT (Grade 3 hyperglycemia) out of 6 evaluable pts, and 3 enrolled pts at 60 mg are still in the DLT evaluation. Most frequent treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (all grades, ≥ 20%) included hyperglycemia (17 pts, 85%), decreased appetite (5 pts, 25%), diarrhea (4 pts, 20%). Grade≥3 TRAEs were hyperglycemia (8 pts, 40%), nausea (1 pt, 5%) and decreased appetite (1 pt, 5%). Hyperglycemia was generally manageable with anti-hyperglycemic medications. The preliminary PK profile of CYH33 showed dose proportionality across the tested dose levels, half-life (t1/2) was about 20 hours with minimum accumulation, and the maximum concentration (Cmax) achieved 2-4 hours after dosing. Over all, among 15 tumor response evaluable pts, partial response (PR) was observed in 2 pts treated with 40mg (1 colorectal cancer with unknown PIK3CA mutation status, 1 breast cancer with PIK3CA mutant), and stable disease (SD) was observed in 3 pts with unknown PIK3CA mutation status. After the cut-off date, 1 more pt (ovarian cancer with PIK3CA mutation) treated with 40mg achieved PR, so that 2 out of 3 enrolled PIK3CA mutant pts treated with 40mg achieved PR. Conclusions: The first-in-human study of the PI3Kα selective inhibitor CYH33 demonstrated a manageable safety profile, linear PK, and encouraging preliminary anti-tumor activity. CYH33 single agent and in combination with other anti-tumor agents have be planned in future studies. Clinical trial information: 03544905.

Phase I study of topotecan and cisplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors: a cancer and leukemia group B study.

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 2743-2750 ◽  
Author(s):  
A A Miller ◽  
J B Hargis ◽  
R C Lilenbaum ◽  
S Z Fields ◽  
G L Rosner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Trials ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE The objectives of this phase I trial were to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan combined with cisplatin, to define the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of the combination without and with the use of filgrastim, and to define recommended doses for phase II trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible if they had normal bone marrow, renal, and hepatic function and had not previously been treated with platinum compounds. Topotecan was administered intravenously on days 1 through 5 and cisplatin was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The topotecan dose was fixed at 1.0 mg/m2/d on the first four dose levels, and cisplatin was escalated in 25-mg/m2 increments from 25 to 100 mg/m2 without filgrastim. After encountering DLT, the dose of cisplatin was decreased by one level and topotecan dose escalation was attempted. After defining the MTD without growth factor, the study proceeded with escalating cisplatin doses to define the MTD with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg subcutaneously (SC) daily starting on day 6 of treatment. Priming with filgrastim 5 micrograms/kg SC on days -6 to -2 before the first course was explored last. RESULTS Of 38 patients entered, 37 were eligible, 35 assessable for toxicity in the first course, and 28 assessable for response. The principal toxicity was grade 4 neutropenia, which had to last more than 7 days to be considered dose-limiting. No DLT was observed at the starting cisplatin dose of 25 mg/m2 (dose level 1). On level 2 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2, one patient had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 renal toxicity. On level 3 (cisplatin 75 mg/m2), two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia. Therefore, cisplatin dose escalation was stopped. On dose level 5 (cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and topotecan 1.25 mg/m2/d), one patient had grade 4 neutropenia that lasted more than 7 days and one patient died of neutropenic sepsis. The remaining dose levels used topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (level 6) and 100 mg/m2 (levels 7 and 8) with filgrastim. No DLT was observed on level 6. On level 7, two patients had dose-limiting neutropenia and one patient had grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Priming with filgrastim on level 8 demonstrated no obvious advantage over level 7, and one patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia that lasted more than 7 days. Three patients with non-small-cell lung cancer achieved a partial response and one patient with breast cancer had a complete response. CONCLUSION Topotecan and cisplatin in combination cause more neutropenia than expected from either drug given alone at the same dosage. The recommended phase II doses are topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d for 5 days in combination with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 without filgrastim or cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 with filgrastim support.

First-in-human phase I dose-escalation study of the oral selective C-met inhibitor EMD 1204831 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3107-3107
Author(s):  
Hesham M. Amin ◽  
Gerald Steven Falchook ◽  
Siqing Fu ◽  
David S. Hong ◽  
Apostolia Maria Tsimberidou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Cell Surface Receptor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Multiple Dosing ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Tumor Cell Migration ◽  
Met Inhibitor ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

3107^ Background: The cell surface receptor tyrosine kinase c-Met and its ligand, the hepatocyte growth factor, are implicated in tumor cell migration, invasion, survival, and proliferation. EMD 1204831 is a novel potent and highly selective reversible, ATP-competitive small molecule c-Met inhibitor. Methods: This is a phase I, first-in-human clinical trial with escalating doses of EMD 1204831 (NCT01110083). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives included evaluation of safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (Pd), and preliminary anti-tumor activity. Eligible patients had advanced solid tumors not amenable to standard therapies. Following a classical 3+3 dose-escalation scheme, successive cohorts of patients were treated with twice daily (BID) oral EMD 1204831 in 21-day cycles. Pd markers were evaluated in paired tumor biopsies (phospho-c-Met). Results: Until 31 December 2011, 30 patients were enrolled and treated. The dose was escalated in successive cohorts starting from 50 mg BID up to 1400 mg BID. After first (single) administration, median Cmax and AUC0–12 values increased with dose. At higher doses, a decrease in exposure of EMD 1204831 was noted after multiple dosing, potentially caused by autoinduction of the compound’s metabolism. Further dose escalation was discontinued, and no further patients were enrolled. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade (G) 3 pancreatitis, considered as a serious adverse event (AE), was observed at 400 mg BID. No other DLTs or treatment-related serious AEs were observed. The remaining treatment-related AEs of G2 or higher included G3 and G2 lipase elevation (n=1 for each grade), G2 upper abdominal pain (n=2), G2 gastroesophageal reflux disease (n=2), and G2 constipation (n=1). Twenty-five patients (83%) had no drug-related toxicity greater than G1. Of 29 patients evaluable for anti-tumor activity, 3 had stable disease lasting for at least 4 months. Conclusions: Due to potential autoinduction of the compound’s metabolism, dose escalation was discontinued before an MTD was reached. Final safety, PK, and clinical tumor response results will be presented.

Phase I dose-escalating study of PM02734 in a 24-hour infusion schedule every 21 days in advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2511-2511
Author(s):  
T. R. Evans ◽  
A. Oaknin ◽  
R. J. Jones ◽  
A. Vandermeeren ◽  
C. Coronado ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Dose Escalating

2511 Background: PM02734 is a chemically synthesized depsipeptide with a broad spectrum of activity against solid tumors in vitro (breast, colon, lung, neuroblastoma, prostate, sarcoma and thyroid) and in vivo (breast, prostate, melanoma); as well as an acceptable non-clinical toxicology profile. Methods: Patients (pts) with metastatic or advanced solid tumors were enrolled in a phase I, open-label, dose-escalating study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended dose (RD) of PM02734 infused over 24 hours every 21 days (d). The starting dose was 0.48 mg/m2. Cohorts of 1–6 pts were treated at different dose levels. Results: Thirty seven pts were treated in this study. The median age was 55 years (40–75), sex: males/females 20/19. The median PS was 1 (range 0–2). The most frequent cancer types were colon/ gastric/ sarcoma (n=8/5/5). Most patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of prior therapy lines of 4 (1–12). Patients were treated at 8 dose levels (0.48, 0.72, 1.0, 1.6, 2.4, 3.6, 5.4, and 6.8 mg/m2), the MTD was 6.8 mg/m2 and the RD was 5.4 mg/m2 (10 mg flat dose).Common toxicities grade ≤ 2 included asthenia, nausea/emesis, lymphopenia, injection site reactions and asymptomatic elevated transaminases (TAs). DLT were grade 3 asymptomatic, reversible TA elevations at 6.8 mg/m2. Preliminary PK data is characterized by long half life (>100 h), a wide distribution and high inter-patient variability. Clearance was not correlated with dose or body surface area (BSA), therefore, flat dose was implemented and the RD was explored with this schedule. Efficacy data showed one complete response (CR) of +28 months observed in a pt with metastatic large cell esophageal carcinoma, and five more showed stable disease (SD) for more than 3 months in different histologies. Conclusions: PM02734 shows to be safe, well tolerated and with evidence of activity (1 CR and 5 SD > 3 months) in pts with advanced solid tumors. The DLT was grade 3 asymptomatic and reversible TA elevations, and the RD for further phase II studies is 10 mg. [Table: see text]

A first-in-human phase I study to evaluate the pan-PI3K inhibitor GDC-0941 administered QD or BID in patients with advanced solid tumors

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3501-3501 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Wagner ◽  
D. H. Von Hoff ◽  
P. M. LoRusso ◽  
R. Tibes ◽  
K. E. Mazina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Ca 125 ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity ◽  
Dose Proportional

3501 Background: The PI3K-PTEN-AKT signaling pathway is deregulated in a wide variety of cancers. GDC-0941 is a potent and selective oral inhibitor of the class I PI3K with 3 nM IC50 for the p110-alpha subunit in vitro and 28 nM IC50 in a cell-based pAKT assay and demonstrates broad activity in breast, ovarian, lung, and prostate cancer models. Methods: A Phase I dose escalation study using a 3+3 design was initiated in patients (pts) with solid tumors. GDC-0941 was given on d1, followed by 1 wk washout to study single-dose PK and PD markers. GDC-0941 was then administered qd on a 3 wk on, 1 wk off, schedule. Steady-state PK and PD were evaluated after 1 wk of continuous dosing. A separate concurrent dose-escalation arm with bid dosing was initiated after the third qd cohort. Results: Nineteen pts have been enrolled in 5 successive dose-escalation cohorts in the qd arm with dose levels up to 80 mg daily. Seven pts were enrolled in 2 cohorts in the bid arm at total daily doses of 60 and 80 mg. The most frequently reported drug-related AEs were Grade 1/2 nausea, fatigue, diarrhea, peripheral edema, and dysgeusia; no drug related grade >3 events have been reported. PK data suggest dose-proportional increases in Cmax and AUC. Potential signs of anti-tumor activity have been observed with a soft tissue sarcoma pt on-study for >176 days with stable disease (30 mg qd), an ovarian cancer pt with an on-study 2.8-fold decrease in CA-125 response to normal levels (30 mg bid) and a pt with endometrial cancer with a decrease in tumor FDG-PET uptake (80 mg qd). Conclusions: GDC-0941 is generally well-tolerated with potential signs of anti-tumor activity. Preliminary PK data suggest dose-proportional increases in exposure over the dose levels evaluated. Dose-escalation on both the qd and bid schedules continues with updated data to be presented. [Table: see text]

A first-in-human phase I study of oral pan-CDK inhibitor BAY 1000394 in patients with advanced solid tumors: Dose escalation with an intermittent 3 days on/4 days off schedule.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3012-3012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rastislav Bahleda ◽  
Anas Gazzah ◽  
Andrea Varga ◽  
Prabhu Rajagopalan ◽  
David Andrew Henderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Oral Solution ◽  
Tablet Formulation ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Cdk Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antiemetic Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

3012 Background: BAY 1000394 (BAY) is an oral pan-CDK inhibitor targeting CDKs 1,2,4, 7 and 9 in the low nanomolar range. A phase I dose escalation study was initiated to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors. Methods: BAY was administered twice daily in a 3 days on / 4 days off schedule (cycle length 21 days, 3+3 design). PK was evaluated on cycle 1 day 1 and day 10. Response rate was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. PD markers included CK18 fragments in plasma. Results: As of Jan 08 2011, 34 pts were treated at doses of 0.6 (3 pts), 1.2 (4), 2.4 (3), 4.8 (3), 9.6 (3), 19.2 (6) mg per day as oral solution and at doses of 10 (4), 15 (6) and 20 (2) mg per day as tablet. Tumor types included 10 colorectal, 4 mesothelioma and 20 others. Cohort 9 (20 mg tablet) is ongoing. Frequent CTCAEv4 grade 1/2 drug related AEs occurring in more than 25% of patients up to cohort 8 were asthenia, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and anorexia. DLTs (grade 3, 1 pt each) were hyponatremia, aphtous stomatitis at 19.2 mg solution and arterial thrombosis at 15 mg tablet. Aphthous stomatitis (20%) has not been observed with the tablet formulation. Other grade 3 related AEs were asthenia in 2 and nausea and vomiting in one pt each. Nausea and vomiting on treatment days were observed despite antiemetic treatment (aprepitant +/- setron). PK was dose proportional up to 9.6 mg, T1/2 was 10 hours, and relative bioavailability of tablet formulation was excellent; major metabolite levels were low (<10%). Levels of CK18 fragments did not correlate with dose or tumor response. Stable disease (SD) lasting for 2-4 months was observed in 9 patients, among others in 4 of 4 mesothelioma and 2 of 2 ovarian pts. One additional pt with cholangiocarcinoma has ongoing SD lasting for 5 months. One of the ovarian pts had a significant decline of CA125 lasting for 3 months. Conclusions: The tablet formulation of BAY 1000394 was better tolerated than oral solution. So far, doses up to a 15 mg per day with concomitant antiemetic treatment showed an acceptable tolerability. SD was observed in 10 of 25 heavily pretreated pts across cohorts 3 – 8.

Phase I study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, and everolimus in advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 490-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatima A. Rangwala ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Mark Kozloff ◽  
Christy Arrowood ◽  
Jennifer Meadows ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Rectovaginal Fistula ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3

490 Background: Everolimus (E), an oral rapamycin analogue, is a potent mTOR inhibitor. Combined inhibition of VEGF and mTOR pathways may increase anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activity. We evaluated E in combination with capecitabine (C), oxaliplatin (O), and bevacizumab (B) in a phase I dose escalation study. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had advanced solid tumors, adequate organ function and no increased risk for class-related toxicities. B and O were given intravenously; C and E were orally administered. Cycle length was 21 days. Doses for level 1: C 850 mg/m2 on days 1-14; O 130 mg/m2 on day one; B 7.5 mg/kg on day one; and E 5 mg three times a week. Doses for level -1: C 680 mg/m2, O100mg/m2. An intermediate dose level (-1b) of E escalated to 5 mg five times weekly was added to maximize dose intensity. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was assessed in cycle 1. Concomitant administration of CYP3A4 substrates, inhibitors or inducers was prohibited. Results: Dose escalation is complete with 27 pts evaluable for toxicity and 24 evaluable for efficacy. Two DLTs (grade 2 intolerable fatigue, anorexia, vomiting and grade 3 diarrhea) were observed in 6 pts in cohort 1. No DLTs were observed in cohort -1; one DLT (rectovaginal fistula) was observed in the -1b cohort. Possible grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events any time on study (n=1 except as indicated) included diarrhea (n=2), intestinal perforation/fistula, rectovaginal fistula, hypertriglyceridemia (n=3), hyperglycemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, peripheral neuropathy, neutropenia (n=2), lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypertension (n=3), deep vein thrombosis, and arterial thrombosis. Adverse events were consistent with known class-related toxicities. For efficacy, 10 pts had a partial response (PR); 10 had stable disease as best response. Of 13 pts with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), 5 had a PR. Of 8 pts with chemonaive mCRC, 5 had a PR. Conclusions: E in combination with full dose C, O and B was associated with unacceptable toxicity, primarily GI toxicity. E at 5mg five times weekly, C at 680 mg/m2 on days 1-14, O at 100 mg/m2 and B at 7.5 mg/kg on day one appears well tolerated. Activity was noted in chemorefractory and chemonaive mCRC patients.

Phase I result of ICP-192 (gunagratinib), a highly selective irreversible FGFR inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring FGFR pathway alterations.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4092-4092
Author(s):  
Ye Guo ◽  
Chunwang Yuan ◽  
Jieer Ying ◽  
Xu Zhu ◽  
Guodong Luan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Covalent Binding ◽  
Oral Dosage ◽  
Phosphate Binders ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors ◽  
Multiple Tumor ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

4092 Background: ICP-192 (gunagratinib), developed by InnoCare Pharma, is a novel pan-FGFR (fibroblast growth factor receptors) inhibitor that potently and selectively inhibits FGFR activities irreversibly by covalent binding. Preclinical data showed that gunagratinib overcomes the acquired resistance to the first-generation reversible FGFR inhibitors, e.g., infigratinib. ICP-CL-00301 is a phase I, first-in-human, clinical study which includes a dose escalation followed by dose expansion. The safety and tolerability as well as pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) of gunagratinib were evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors, and the preliminary anti-tumor activity was evaluated by RECIST1.1 in patients with FGF/FGFR gene aberrations. Methods: In the dose-escalation stage, patients with advanced solid tumors with or without FGF/FGFR alterations were treated with escalating doses (2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 mg etc.) of gunagratinib once daily in 21-day cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. During the dose-expansion stage, patients with cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 gene fusion/translocation received the treatment of gunagratinib daily at 12 mg continuously. Results: As of February 2021, a total of 30 patients had received the treatment of gunagratinib. The median age of the treated patients was 55.0 (range: 28 to 75 years) with 56.7% male and ECOG performance status between 0-1. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) had not been reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) ( > 20%) included hyperphosphatemia, hypercalcemia, increased ALT or AST, diarrhea and hypertriglyceridemia. Hyperphosphatemia is a commonly reported AE from other trials targeting FGFR and here serves as a PD biomarker of FGFR inhibition. This PD biomarker was observed in 73.3% of the patients treated with gunagratinib at all dose levels and was consistently observed at doses of 8 mg QD and above. Hyperphosphatemia was well managed with oral phosphate binders when necessary. The plasma exposure increased proportionally to the oral dosage levels of gunagratinib. Among the 12 patients with FGF/FGFR gene aberrations who have completed at least one tumor assessment, the overall response rate (ORR) was 33.3%, including 1 patient (8.3%) of cholangiocarcinoma with complete response (CR) and 3 patients (25%) with partial response (PR). The disease control rate (DCR) was 91.7% (11 of 12 patients). Conclusions: Gunagratinib is safe and well-tolerated in patients with advanced solid tumors. Anti-tumor activity was demonstrated in patients with FGF/FGFR gene aberrations in multiple tumor types, including cholangiocarcinoma (NCT03758664). Better response is expected with the increase of treatment durations. Clinical trial information: NCT03758664.

First-in-human study of highly selective FGFR2 inhibitor, RLY-4008, in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and other advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4165-TPS4165
Author(s):  
Alison M. Schram ◽  
Suneel Deepak Kamath ◽  
Anthony B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
Mitesh J. Borad ◽  
Kabir Mody ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Precision Oncology ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Anti Tumor Activity

TPS4165 Background: Oncogenic activation of FGFR2 via genomic rearrangement, gene amplification, or point mutation in advanced solid tumors provides the opportunity for rapid clinical development of highly selective FGFR2 inhibitors using a precision oncology approach to deliver clinical benefit to genomically-defined patient (pt) populations. Unfortunately, this opportunity remains largely unrealized as current, non-selective small molecule inhibitors (pan-FGFRi) suffer from off-isoform toxicity (FGFR1-hyperphosphatemia; FGFR4-diarrhea) and on-target acquired resistance leading to only modest efficacy primarily limited to FGFR2-fusion+ intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). RLY-4008 is a novel, oral FGFR2 inhibitor designed to overcome the limitations of pan-FGFRi by potently and selectively targeting primary oncogenic FGFR2 alterations and acquired resistance mutations. We initiated a first-in-human (FIH) precision oncology study of RLY-4008 in advanced solid tumor pts with FGFR2 alterations with primary objectives to define the maximum tolerated dose/recommended phase 2 dose (MTD/RP2D) and adverse event (AE) profile of RLY-4008 and key secondary objectives to assess FGFR2 genotype in blood and tumor tissue, pharmacokinetics (PK), and anti-tumor activity. Methods: This is a global, multi-center, FIH dose escalation/expansion study of RLY-4008 (NCT04526106) in adult pts who have unresectable or metastatic solid tumors with FGFR2 alteration per local assessment, ECOG performance status 0-2, measurable or evaluable disease per RECIST 1.1, and who are refractory, intolerant, or declined standard therapy including pan-FGFRi. FGFR2 alteration will be confirmed retrospectively by central laboratory assessment. For the dose escalation (Ñ50), RLY-4008 is administered QD/BID on a continuous schedule with 4-week cycles according to a Bayesian Optimal Interval design that allows accelerated dose titration, additional accrual to dose levels declared tolerable, and exploration of alternative schedules if warranted. The MTD is determined via logistic regression of the dose limiting toxicity rate across all dose levels and an RP2D less than the MTD may be considered based on observed AEs, PK, and anti-tumor activity. Following dose escalation, the dose expansion (Ñ75) will treat pts with RLY-4008 at the MTD/RP2D and includes 5 groups with any prior therapy (except group 2): 1. FGFR2 fusion+ ICC pts; 2. FGFR2 fusion+ ICC pts with no prior FGFRi; 3. FGFR2 fusion+ pts with other solid tumors; 4. FGFR2-mutation+ solid tumor pts and 5. FGFR2-amplified solid tumor pts. The primary endpoints are MTD/RP2D and AE profile; key secondary endpoints are FGFR2 genotype in blood and tumor tissue, PK parameters; overall response rate, and duration of response per RECIST 1.1. US enrollment began SEP2020 and Europe/Asia start-up is underway. Clinical trial information: NCT04526106.

Phase I study of sirolimus plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: A Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS) study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3096-3096
Author(s):  
Juan Martin Liberal ◽  
Marta Gil ◽  
Laura Jimenez ◽  
Maria Ochoa de Olza ◽  
Carmen Munoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Skin Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3096 Background: In preclinical studies, combination of sirolimus with gemcitabine enhances apoptosis in vitro and increases anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, age 18-70 years, no prior mTOR inhibitor or gemcitabine, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function, were enrolled in this phase I study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine. A 3+3 dose escalation design with cohorts of 3-6 patients was used. Sirolimus was given po continuously. Gemcitabine was given iv 10mg/m2/minute on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose levels 1, 2 and 3 corresponded to sirolimus 2, 2 and 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800, 1000 and 1000mg/m2 respectively. After observing DLTs at higher dose level and poorer mTOR signaling inhibition at lower doses, a new cohort of sirolimus 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 was added. Skin biopsies pre and post treatment were performed to assess the inhibition of mTOR pathway. Results: 19 patients were enrolled: median age 51 years (36-70); gender 12M, 7F. Median number of cycles was 4. Patients were treated at 4 dose levels, the MTD was reached at level 3 and the RD was: sirolimus 5mg/24h and gemcitabine 800mg/m2. 3 DLTs were observed, 1 at dose level 2 and 2 at dose level 3: transaminitis grade 3, thrombocytopenia grade 3 and thrombocytopenia grade 4. Other toxicities grade 1-2 included anemia, neutropenia, asthenia, mucositis and high cholesterol levels. 2 patients achieved partial response (1 uterine cervix cancer and 1 colon cancer). Immunohistochemistry of pS6 in skin biopsies showed significative inhibition of mTOR pathway at RD. PK parameters estimated were in agreement with those previously reported in the literature. No influence of sirolimus administration on gemcitabine clearance was found. Conclusions: Combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine is feasible and safe, allowing administration of active doses of both agents and achieving mTOR signaling inhibition. A phase II study to assess the activity of this combination in sarcomas is ongoing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document