Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and the significance of Rad51 expression as a factor predictive of the treatment response.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14601-e14601
Author(s):  
Hiroshi Saeki ◽  
Tomonori Nakanoko ◽  
Hajime Ohtsu ◽  
Hiroyuki Kawano ◽  
Koji Ando ◽  
...  

e14601 Background: The clinical significance of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and its effect on the development of postoperative complications are unclear. On the other hand, the Rad51 expression is related to the sensitivity to chemotherapy or radiotherapy; however, the significance of the Rad51 expression in ESCC has not yet been clarified. Methods: 1) One hundred sixty-eight patients with clinical Stage II-III (cStageII-III) ESCC were classified into two groups consisting of 76 who received NACRT followed by esophagectomy and 92 patients who received surgery alone. The prognosis and incidence of postoperative complications were retrospectively compared between the two groups. The pathological response to NACRT as well as the patient prognosis were also analyzed for the NACRT group patients. 2) The expression of Rad51 was investigated in pretreatment biopsy specimens in 41 ESCC cases who underwent surgery after NACRT, and the findings were compared with the pathological response to NACRT. Results: 1) The 5-year survival rate was 47.7% in the surgery alone group and 56.5% in the NACRT group, and the difference was not a statistically significant (p=0.4831). However, the 5-year survival rates of patients in whom NACRT was Grade 3 (markedly effective), was obviously better than that of the other patients (Grade0/1 – ineffective/slightly effective: 36.9%, Grade 2 - moderately effective: 53.8%, Grade 3 - markedly effective: 100%). The incidence of postoperative complications was 31.5% in the surgery alone group and 40.8% in the NACRT group, and the difference was not a statistically significant (p=0.2121). 2) Grade 3 was more frequently observed in Rad51-negative cases (n=13) than Rad51-positive cases (n=28; 71.4% vs. 28.6%, p=0.0239). Conclusions: The pathological complete response of NACRT is critical for improving the survival of patients with cStageII-III ESCC. The Rad51 expression in pretreatment biopsy specimens was therefore suggested to be a useful predictive factor for the response to NACRT.

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 139-139
Author(s):  
Tadahiro Hirashima ◽  
Ken Sasaki ◽  
Yasuto Uchikado ◽  
Itaru Omoto ◽  
Yusaku Osako ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to assess the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in predicting pathological response and survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Methods Thirty patients with advanced ESCC received nCRT followed by surgery, and underwent FDG-PET/CT twice before and after nCRT. We compared the results of FDG-PET/CT with the pathological results and prognosis. Results Pathological response was found to correlate with the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) after nCRT and the rate of decrease of SUVmax. Using univariate analysis, pN, SUVmax after nCRT and the rate of decrease of SUVmax were found to be prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis revealed that only pN was an independent prognostic factor Conclusion The prediction of pathological response and prognosis using FDG-PET/CT is not as reliable as pathological detection of lymph node metastasis, but could be a useful method contributing to treatment decisions. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) plus surgery has been shown to improve survival rates and should be regarded as a standard of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Appropriate evaluation of nCRT efficacy based on noninvasive parameters might help in individualizing treatments for patients with ESCC. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positronemission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) reflects tumor cell viability based on enhanced FDG uptake as a result of increased glucose metabolism. FDG-PET/CT is useful for the staging of advanced ESCC before treatment, and for evaluating the response to nCRT; however, findings from currently available studies in this regard are controversial. In the present study, we examined the role and usefulness of FDG-PET/CT in decisions regarding staging, prediction of histopathological response, and overall survival in patients with advanced ESCC treated with nCRT; this was achieved by analyzing the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) before and after treatment, and the rate of decrease of SUVmax. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 773-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
YOSHINORI FUJIWARA ◽  
REIGETSU YOSHIKAWA ◽  
NORIHIKO KAMIKONYA ◽  
TSUYOSHI NAKAYAMA ◽  
KOTARO KITANI ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-lyun Lee ◽  
Sung-bae Kim ◽  
Hwoon-yong Jung ◽  
Seung-il Park ◽  
Dong-kwan Kim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zixian Jin ◽  
Dong Chen ◽  
Meng Chen ◽  
Sijia Ren ◽  
Chunguo Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract   The best treatment for the esophageal squamous cell carcinoma has not been determined. To determine the most effective and safest treatment mode for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through a network meta-analysis. Methods A Bayesian model was used for a network meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of surgery alone, neoadjuvant therapy, and adjuvant therapy. Results Overall survival rate: Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were significantly advantageous over surgery alone [hazard ratio (HR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57–0.93; HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.65–0.86]. Adjuvant chemotherapy may not be as effective as surgery alone [HR 1.08, 95%CI 0.84–1.39], although there was no statistical difference. There was no statistically significant difference between adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Disease-free survival rate: Compared with surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy had significant benefits [HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.53–0.78]; adjuvant chemoradiotherapy had similar, but not significant, benefits [HR 0.7, 0.95%CI 0.45–1.06]. The difference between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was also not statistically significant. Conclusion Both neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy appear to be the best supplements to surgery for locally advanced resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.


2012 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-195
Author(s):  
K. Minashi ◽  
T. Yano ◽  
T. Kojima ◽  
M. Onozawa ◽  
K. Nihei ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xi-Lei Zhou ◽  
Chang-Hua Yu ◽  
Wan-Wei Wang ◽  
Fu-Zhi Ji ◽  
Yao-Zu Xiong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This retrospective study was to assess and compare the toxicity and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with S-1 or docetaxel and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods Patients with locally advanced ESCC who received CCRT with S-1 (70 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–14, every 3 weeks for 2 cycles, S-1 group) or docetaxel (25 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on day 1 weekly (DP group) between 2014 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was delivered in 1.8–2.0 Gy per fraction to a total dose of 50–60 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0), response rate, and survival outcomes were compared between groups. Results A total of 175 patients were included in this study (72 in the S-1 group and 103 in the DP group). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events were significantly lower in the S-1 group than that of the DP group (22.2% vs. 45.6%, p = 0.002). In the DP group, elderly patients (> 60 years) had a significantly higher rate of grade 3–4 adverse events than younger patients (58.1% vs. 31.3%, p = 0.01). The objective overall response rate (complete response + partial response) was 68.1% in the S-1 group, and 73.8% the DP group (p = 0.497). The 3-year overall survival was 34.7% in the S-1 group, and 38.8% in the DP group (p = 0.422). The 3-year progression free survival in the DP group was higher than that in the S-1 group but without significant difference (33.0% vs. 25.0%, p = 0.275). Conclusion CCRT with S-1 is not inferior to CCRT with docetaxel and cisplatin and is better tolerated in in elderly patients with locally advanced ESCC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document