Rates of bone mineral density measurement in men with prostate cancer starting androgen deprivation therapy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 174-174
Author(s):  
Maria Suarez-Almazor ◽  
Prashanth Peddi ◽  
Ruili Luo ◽  
Hoang Nguyen ◽  
Linda S. Elting

174 Background: Men with prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) are at risk for accelerated bone loss and osteoporotic fractures. Current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan for risk assessment when starting ADT. Our objective was to determine if DXA scans were performed prior or soon after ADT initiation among men with prostate cancer. Methods: In this claims-based database linkage study, men with prostate cancer were identified fromthe Texas Cancer Registry between 2006-2007 and their records were linked with Medicare databases parts A, B and D to identify claims for ADT using generic names, predefined J codes and ICD codes. Part D claims are currently available for years 2007 and 2008. DXA claims were obtained using CPT/HCPS codes from Medicare part A and part B. Patients were considered to have undergone a DXA exam, useful as a baseline screening test for ADT therapy if a claim could be identified within 2 years before starting ADT therapy, or 6 months afterwards. Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to examine determinants of DXA use. Results: 1,647 men 65 years and older were included in the study. A total of 144 (8.3%) had a DXA scan obtained within 2 years and 6 months after initiation of ADT. Age older than 75 years, history of prior bisphosphonate usage and residence in the metropolitan area were statistically significantly associated with higher likelihood of obtaining DXA. Race, gender, median income, high school percentage, number of ADT claims, and type of ADT used were not associated with DXA usage. Conclusions: Despite the importance of osteoporosis screening, men with prostate cancer and Medicare insurance, in the state of Texas, had very low DXA utilization rates prior, or soon after, the initiation of ADT. Further research is needed to identify barriers to adherence to recommendations for the evaluation of bone health in patients with prostate cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A246-A247
Author(s):  
Hajerah Sonnabend ◽  
Vishnu Priya Pulipati ◽  
Sanford Baim ◽  
Todd Beck ◽  
Ethan M Ritz ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) decreases bone mineral density and increases osteoporotic fracture (OsteoFx) risk. Hypothesis: To assess OsteoFx incidence most predictive of future OsteoFx among men with prostate cancer on ADT. Methods: 4370 electronic medical records were reviewed of adult men with prostate cancer on cancer therapy +/- anti-osteoporotic therapy (Anti-OsteoRx) from 2011–2019. Cancer therapy included ADT (anti-androgens, GnRH agonists & antagonists, orchiectomy) and supplemental cancer therapy (SupplRx) (prostatectomy, brachytherapy, radiation, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy). Anti-OsteoRx included bisphosphonates, denosumab, and parathyroid hormone analogs. Patients with other cancers within 5 years of initial visit, metastasis or traumatic fractures were excluded. Retrospective analysis was done to determine baseline characteristics, type and duration of ADT, Anti-OsteoRx, SupplRx, and OsteoFx incidence. Results: Fracture rate subgroups: • ADT only - Anti-OsteoRx 37/ 374 fractured (9.89%) • ADT only + Anti-OsteoRx 10/52 fractured (19.23%) • ADT + SupplRx + Anti-OsteoRx 2/19 fractured (10.53%) • ADT + SupplRx + Anti-OsteoRx 13/170 fractured (7.65%) Comparing fracture rates between subgroups: • Comparing ADT only +/- Anti-OsteoRx, statistical significance was observed with higher fracture rate in patients taking Anti-OsteoRx (19.23% vs. 9.89%, p < 0.044) • Comparing ADT + SupplRx +/- Anti-OsteoRx, no significant difference in fracture rates due to small number of fractures Comparing combined subgroups: • ADT +/- SupplRx + Anti-OsteoRx 12/71 (16.9%) fractured • ADT +/- SupplRx - Anti-OsteoRx 50/544 (9.19%) fractured • Statistically significant between groups fracture rates was observed (p= 0.042) in patients treated with Anti-OsteoRX. Discussion: Patients receiving Anti-OsteoRx, regardless of their prostate cancer therapies, had higher rates of fractures (16.9 vs. 9.19%, p= 0.042) due to their being selected for therapy based on greater clinical risks. The Anti-OsteoRx group had a higher percentage of glucocorticoid listed as a historical medication (26.8 vs.15.3% vs, p= 0.023), glucocorticoids administered (50.7 vs. 30.3% p=0.001), and anticonvulsants and proton-pump inhibitor use (45.1 vs. 26.5%, p= 0.002). Conclusion: Higher fracture rates were observed in patients on Anti-OsteoRx that could be related to their being selected for treatment based on risk factors known to be associated with osteoporosis. Limited Anti-OsteoRx use in our study is possibly related to lack of standardized guidelines for prevention of osteoporotic fractures in prostate cancer patients. OsteoFx risk assessment utilizing CRF, DXA, and FRAX may prevent fractures in these high-risk patients. Further long-term prospective studies to address these unresolved queries are warranted.


2009 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 753-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abbas H. Panju ◽  
Henriette Breunis ◽  
Angela M. Cheung ◽  
Marc Leach ◽  
Neil Fleshner ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 369-370
Author(s):  
Aileen Hariman ◽  
Dominick Bufalino ◽  
Brian Hess ◽  
Chike Obi ◽  
Ronald Price ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document