dxa scan
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

87
(FIVE YEARS 42)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S507-S507
Author(s):  
Smit Rajput ◽  
Dora Lebron ◽  
Alicia Lagasca ◽  
Jaffer Hussain ◽  
Ogheneruona Odili ◽  
...  

Abstract Background With HIV therapy, the life expectancy of persons with HIV (PWH) has improved and complications associated with long-standing HIV and antiretroviral drugs have become more apparent. Low bone mineral density (BMD) (defined by T score < -1) and osteoporosis (defined by T-score < -2.5) are common in PWH. In a meta-analysis of 884 HIV-infected patients, 67% had reduced BMD, of whom 15% had osteoporosis which is 3 times greater than HIV uninfected controls. IDSA guidelines recommend routine screening for osteoporosis in PWH aged ≥ 50 years, yet the rate of screening for osteoporosis in these patients remains low (7.4%-17%). This QI project aimed to estimate the frequency of and identify the barriers to screening for osteoporosis in eligible HIV patients. Methods This prospective observational study was conducted in the HIV clinic at East Carolina University from 2018-2019. A sample of 104 HIV patients, ≥ 50 years were selected randomly. Data regarding referral for DXA (dual X-ray absorptiometry) scan, its results, and their insurance provider was collected. The plan was to analyze the barriers associated with guideline-recommended BMD screening and implement it in eligible patients. Results From a total of 104, 89 patients (85.6%) were referred for a DXA scan. The reasons for lack of referral were obesity, insurance barrier, wheelchair-bound, and test ordered by another provider. Of the 89 patients referred for DXA, only 49 (47% of total) underwent the scan. In terms of barriers, insurance limitation was the most common reason. Out of the patients that had DXA scans, 19 (39%) were found to have low bone density and 1 had osteoporosis. Low BMD was more common in men (63%) as compared to women (37%) in this group. Percentage of patients who underwent a DXA scan and the barriers in those who didn’t Frequency of BMD screening Incidence of Low BMD BMD results Conclusion In our study, 47% of patients had a BMD assessment. This is better than what has been reported in other single-center studies, however, it is not ideal. About 34% of the patients had insurance coverage as the major barrier for routine screening, as has been mentioned in other similar studies. Of the patients who underwent the DXA scan, 41 % had a low BMD. Other studies have reported variable prevalence of abnormal BMD, from 47-93%. Interestingly, the prevalence of low BMD in our cohort was close to the national average in non-HIV patients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Author(s):  
Tamara Hew-Butler ◽  
Haley Jurczyszyn ◽  
Jordan Sabourin ◽  
Matthew VanSumeren ◽  
Valerie Smith-Hale
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco A. Minetto ◽  
Chiara Busso ◽  
Piera Lalli ◽  
Giulia Gamerro ◽  
Giuseppe Massazza

The proper assessment and follow-up of obesity and sarcopenia are relevant for the proper management of the complications of cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal frailty. A total body dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan should be systematically incorporated in the rehabilitative routine management of patients with obesity and sarcopenia. In the former patients, the total body DXA can be used to assess the fat tissue amount and distribution, while in the latter patients, it can be used to quantify the reduction of appendicular lean mass and to investigate the inter-limb lean mass asymmetry. This tutorial article provides an overview of different DXA-derived fat and lean indices and describes a step-by-step procedure on how to produce a complete DXA report. We suggest that the systematic incorporation of these indices into routine examinations of the patients with obesity and sarcopenia can be useful for identifying the patients at risk for cardiometabolic and neuromuscular impairment-related comorbidities and for evaluating the effectiveness of pharmacological and rehabilitative interventions.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajinder Notey ◽  
Mayla Buensalido ◽  
Rosario Ann Del ◽  
Neil Gittoes ◽  
Sherwin Criseno

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110475
Author(s):  
Noah Kelm ◽  
Tarik Wasfie ◽  
Max Volk ◽  
Zach Walker ◽  
Stephanija Galovska ◽  
...  

Introduction As the elderly population of the United States and the world increases, so does the incidence of osteoporotic fragility fractures from a fall or minor injury. This results in a large cost to the health care system. This cost is further increased as more than 50% of individuals will have refractures within the first year. In order to reduce the refracture rate in such patients, we enrolled our elderly trauma patients with vertebral compression fractures and vertebral augmentation in a Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) clinic for two years and reevaluated their refracture rate. Method This is a retrospective analysis of 720 patients. 142 patients (Group A) were seen between 2012 and 2014 before establishing the FLS program and 578 patients (Group B) were seen between 2015 and 2020 after implementation of the FLS program. The patients enrolled in the FLS program were followed for two years after sustaining a vertebral compression fracture. The data collected included age, sex, serum calcium and vitamin D levels, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, 10-year fracture risk (FRAX) score, pressure measurements in PSI taken during vertebral augmentation, as well as the refracture rate. The data collected were analyzed and compared between the two groups using the Student’s t-test and chi-square test. Results There was significant reduction in the refracture rate of pre-FLS vs post-FLS vertebral, as well as other fractures in the FLS group (pre-FLS: 48.9% vs post-FLS: 37.0%; P = .01). There was no significant difference between groups A and B in regard to the mean serum level of calcium (9.44 mg/dL vs 9.53 mg/dL), vitamin D level (35.04 ng/mL vs 41.39 ng/mL), DXA scan for spine (−.52 vs −.76) and for femur (−1.77 vs −1.52), and 10-year refracture risk for osteoporotic major fracture (FRAX score-mean: 22.6% vs 19.2%) and for hip fracture (9.18% vs 7.53%). There was a significant difference in the mean age between the groups (79.5 vs 73.5 years; P = .01). Of those who underwent vertebral augmentation, 235 had Pressure Scale Index (PSI) measurements taken. There was a trend in increasing refracture rate when PSI ≤199 compared with those who had PSI ≥200, although statistical significance was not met (33.9% vs 27.0%, P = .21). Conclusion A Fracture Liaison Service program will improve the bone health of geriatric osteoporotic patients presenting to the trauma service with vertebral compression fractures and thus reduces the subsequent refracture rate. Further study is needed to evaluate the best PSI used to impact reduction in refracture rate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (8) ◽  
pp. e242349
Author(s):  
Madhura Bharat Karguppikar ◽  
Nikhil Shah ◽  
Vaman Khadilkar ◽  
Anuradha Khadilkar

We present a 7-year-old girl with Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome (RTS) and slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). She underwent bilateral arthroscopy with implant fixation for the SCFE and the symptoms resolved. This was followed by fracture of the femur after minor trauma. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan done to evaluate her bone health revealed a low bone mineral density (BMD). Our case highlights the finding of low BMD on DXA and rare association of SCFE in a child with RTS. The conundrum in this case is whether this child can be labelled to have osteoporosis as defined by the criteria given by the International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 836.1-836
Author(s):  
N. Grygorieva ◽  
V. Povoroznyuk

Background:Nowadays, FRAX is the most useful tool for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment that is included in many guidelines. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and glucocorticoid (CG) use are two crucial factors for osteoporotic fractures included in FRAX algorithm. According to the last ACR guidelines for the treatment of GC-induced osteoporosis [1], it was recommended to divide the patients into three groups of fracture risk (high, medium and low) that have a great impact on treatment decision. Recently, we received own Ukrainian thresholds [2] for the national version of FRAX that are age-dependent and now widely used in clinical practice.Objectives:Our study was aimed to compare two approaches (ACR-2017 and Ukrainian (2019) recommendations) in fracture risk assessment in women with RA and GC use.Methods:We examined 195 females with RA aged 40-89 years old who took GC (at dose ≥5 mg/d for ≥3 months) due to RA. The 10-year probabilities of major osteoporotic (MOFs) and hip fractures (HFs) were calculated with and without bone mineral density (BMD) using the Ukrainian FRAX model [3]. The DXA was used to measure the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total body BMDs; T and Z scores were calculated (DISCOVERY Wi, Hologic, Inc., USA).Results:FRAX indexes for MOFs and HFs without BMD in patients with RA and GC were (Me [25-75Q]) 12.0 [8.1-18.0] and 4.2 [1.7-7.2] %. The correspondent FRAX indexes with BMD were 13.5 [8.5-20.0] and 5.1 [1.8-8.7] %.50 % of examined women had previous fractures and 20 % had previous vertebral fractures. BMD of the femoral neck consisted of 0.62±0.13 and L1-L4 BMD was 0.85±0.15 g/cm2. 89 % of females had low BMD at the lumbar spine and / or femoral neck (49 % osteoporosis and 40 % osteopenia).61 % of women required antiosteoporotic treatment according to ACR-2017 guideline (17.4 % of them a hadhigh risk of MOF and 43.1 % moderate one) without BMD measurement and 64 % of subjects after DXA scan.According to Ukrainian national guideline, 57 % of patients required antiosteoporotic treatment without BMD measurement and 42 % – after additional DXA examination. After BMD measurement in subjects who required the DXA scan, 78.2 % of females with RA and GC use required antiosteoporotic treatment (additionally to calcium and vitamin D, lifestyle modifications).Conclusion:Approximately 60 % of subjects with RA and GC use required antiosteoporotic treatment without additional DXA measurement according to correspondent FRAX indexes from both guidelines. The proportion of women requiring treatment after DXA scan is slightly higher according to Ukrainian recommendations. It proves that both of them can be used effectively in daily clinical practice for fracture risk assessment in females with RA.References:[1]Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, Cannon M et al. 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 2017;69(8), 1521–1537. DOI:10.1002/art.40137[2]Povoroznyuk V, Grygorieva N, Kanis JA et al. Ukrainian FRAX: criteria for diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis. Pain. Joint. Spine. 2019;9(4):7-16. DOI: 10.22141/2224-1507.9.4.2019.191921[3]Povoroznyuk VV, Grygorieva NV, Kanis JA et al. Epidemiology of hip fracture and the development of FRAX in Ukraine. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):53. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0343-2.Disclosure of Interests:Nataliia Grygorieva Consultant of: Servier, Redis, Vladyslav Povoroznyuk: None declared.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A209-A209
Author(s):  
Catherine Stewart ◽  
Paul Benjamin Loughrey ◽  
John R Lindsay

Abstract Background: Osteopetrosis is a group of rare inherited skeletal dysplasias, with each variant sharing the hallmark of increased bone mineral density (BMD). Abnormal osteoclast activity produces overly dense bone predisposing to fracture and skeletal deformities. Whilst no cure for these disorders exists, endocrinologists play an important role in surveillance and management of complications. Clinical Cases: A 43-year-old female had findings suggestive of increased BMD on radiographic imaging performed to investigate shoulder and back pain. X-ray of lumbar spine demonstrated a ‘rugger jersey’ spine appearance, while shoulder X-ray revealed mixed lucency and sclerosis of the humeral head. DXA scan showed T-scores of +11 at the hip and +12.5 at the lumbar spine. MRI of head displayed bilateral narrowing and elongation of the internal acoustic meatus and narrowing of the orbital foramina. Genetic assessment confirmed autosomal dominant osteopetrosis with a CLCN7 variant. Oral colecalciferol supplementation was commenced and multi-disciplinary management instigated with referral to ophthalmology and ENT teams. A 25-year-old male presented with a seven-year history of low back pain and prominent bony swelling around the tibial tuberosities and nape of neck. Past medical history included repeated left scaphoid fracture in 2008 and 2018. Recovery from his scaphoid fracture was complicated by non-union requiring bone grafting with open reduction and fixation. Plain X-rays of the spine again demonstrated ‘rugger jersey’ spine. DXA scan was notable for elevated T scores; +2.9 at hip and +5.8 lumbar spine. MRI spine showed vertebral endplate cortical thickening and sclerosis at multiple levels. The patient declined genetic testing and is under clinical review. A 62-year-old male was referred to the bone metabolism service following a DXA scan showing T scores of +11. 7 at the hip and +13 at the lumbar spine. His primary complaint was of neck pain and on MRI there was multi-level nerve root impingement secondary to facet joint hypertrophy. Past medical history was significant for a long history of widespread joint pains; previous X-ray reports described generalized bony sclerosis up to 11 years previously. Clinical and radiological monitoring continues. Conclusion: Individuals with osteopetrosis require a multidisciplinary approach to management. There is no curative treatment and mainstay of therapy is supportive with active surveillance for complications.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A196-A197
Author(s):  
Chheki Sherpa ◽  
Bishow Chandra Shrestha ◽  
Deepika Nallala ◽  
Ilan Gabriely

Abstract Introduction: The antifracture efficacy of newer agents like PTHrP analogues is promising but knowledge about the mechanism of action and safety profile is needed in order to use these agents effectively. The reported incidence of hypercalcemia defined as albumin-adjusted serum calcium ≥10.7mg/dL was 3.4% in Abaloparitide. Case Presentation: A 59 year-old female with past medical history significant for diabetes mellitus type 2, hypothyroidism, necrotizing autoimmune myositis, osteoporosis and renal stones presented with complaints of generalized body aches and pains with swelling and redness of the left leg. The patient was diagnosed with osteoporosis based on atraumatic L4 compressive injury involving superior end plate. Her only DXA scan was 8 years ago which showed osteopenia, with the lowest T score of -1.2 at lumbar spine. Subsequent evaluation with DXA scan was unable to be performed due to physical disabilities. She was intolerant to oral bisphosphonates and was started on abaloparatide subcutaneous injections 2 weeks prior to her current admission. Her physical examination was positive for obesity, proximal muscle weakness and bilateral leg edema with bruises and left leg erythema. Laboratory findings showed hypercalcemia with corrected calcium levels of 12.48 mg/dl, suppressed intact PTH 4 pg/ml. Evaluations for secondary causes of hypercalcemia were negative. Her last dose of abaloparatide injection was the morning prior to her presentation to the emergency room. The patient was treated with IV fluids and her calcium level improved within 24 hours with normalization of intact PTH level in 72hrs. Abaloparatide injection was suspended on admission. Hypercalcemia with suppressed PTH was most likely secondary to abaloparatide given the timing of the hypercalcemia after the injection and resolution of hypercalcemia and normalization of PTH. Conclusions: Abaloparatide is a peptide that selectively binds to the RG conformation of the parathyroid hormone type 1 receptor. Abaloparatide is increasingly used following the results from the ACTIVE and ACTIVExtend trials which demonstrate significant increase in bone mineral density and risk reduction of vertebral, nonvertebral, clinical, and major osteoporotic fractures. Hypercalcemia was reported as a side effect, but there is no guidance on further evaluation or management of these patients. The incidence of hypercalcemia defined as albumin-adjusted serum calcium ≥10.7mg/dL is 3.4 % and risk is increased in patients with renal impairment. As in our case, transient hypercalcemia and PTH suppression may be associated with abaloparatide. Efficacy of abaloparatide and impact on bone density with delay or interrupted treatment are not available. Further studies are needed to guide monitoring and treatment of clinically symptomatic transient hypercalcemia in patients taking abaloparatide.


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A217-A217
Author(s):  
Hussein Adly ◽  
Steven Ing

Abstract Background: Radiotherapy is a risk factor for osteoporosis and insufficiency fractures via osteoblast apoptosis and vascular injury. PTH analogs teriparatide and abaloparatide are contraindicated in patients with prior exposure to radiotherapy crossing bone due to the increased risk of osteosarcoma. Patients with radiotherapy-associated fractures or osteoporosis were eligible only for antiresorptive agents until romosozumab was recently FDA-approved. Current International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) guidelines include assessment of “opportunistic CT” as a surrogate for DXA scan using L1 vertebral body attenuation: >150 Hounsfield units (HU) is normal and <100 HU signifies osteoporosis. Clinical Case: A 60 year old female patient with history of endometrial cancer diagnosed at age of 57 and treated with hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, chemotherapy, then pelvic radiotherapy, was referred to endocrinology for pelvic insufficiency fractures evaluation. Two years after completing chemoradiotherapy, she complained of right groin and low back pain with difficulty walking. MRI pelvis showed bilateral sacral ala and right pubic ramus insufficiency fractures. She had normal serum mineral concentration, 25-OH vitamin D sufficiency, normal PTH, eGFR, liver function tests and 24-hour urine calcium excretion. Screening for celiac disease and multiple myeloma was negative. DXA scan BMD T-score showed osteoporosis, -3.0 at the right femoral neck. L1-L4 T-score was +0.4 but unreliable due to presence of degenerative changes. Four months after onset of pain, patient started romosozumab 210mg SQ monthly for a total of 12 doses, after which she started oral alendronate. Pain essentially resolved within 6 months of romosozumab therapy. C-telopeptide (CTX) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were obtained at baseline, 3 and 12 months after romosozumab initiation. CTX was 362, 247 and 258 pg/mL (reference range, >49 years: not established), and P1NP was 82, 178 and 62 mcg/L (reference range, 20 - 108), respectively. Attenuation of L1 and L5 vertebral body was measured using CT abdomen and pelvis scans before and 5 months after radiotherapy, and before and after completion of romosozumab therapy. L1 attenuation measured 161, 132, 127 and 179 HU, and L5 measured 150, 46, 50 and 86 HU, respectively. Conclusion: Pelvic radiotherapy was associated with a decline in L1 CT attenuation and even greater magnitude of decrease at L5. Romosozumab was associated with clinical improvement, restoration of L1 CT attenuation and diminishment of regain at L5. Although L5 attenuation has not been previously assessed for osteoporosis, this site may be of predictive value in patients who receive pelvic radiotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document