How breast cancer care is coordinated in hospitals serving predominantly minority women.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17592-e17592
Author(s):  
Ann Scheck McAlearney ◽  
Alexandra Moss ◽  
Rebeca Franco ◽  
Nina A. Bickell
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Minority Women ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Care ◽  
Integration Of Care ◽  
Fully Integrated

e17592 Background: Underuse of adjuvant breast cancer treatment results from system failures and occurs more commonly in minority women. We assessed organizational processes associated with care coordination prior to implementing an intervention. Methods: We interviewed 29 clinical and 20 administrative key informants from 6 hospitals with high volumes of minority breast cancer patients. We analyzed qualitative interview data using the constant comparative method. Results: Hospitals varied in approaches to coordinate adjuvant therapy delivery. All hospitals made a “basic” effort to follow up with patients who missed appointments (e.g., certified letters), but some sites included “extra” efforts such as clinician calls. Processes to coordinate handoffs among providers involved use of clerical staff to reach out across specialties in most sites; several sites also explicitly involved clinicians. Effective tracking and handoffs were hindered where electronic health record (EHR) systems were not fully integrated. A critical distinction was whether breast cancer care delivery was integrated within the hospital. Better integration appeared to facilitate communication among clinicians, as well as promote service coordination. Accountability was an important factor contributing to integration, particularly in sites that were less integrated. Conclusions: Appropriate delivery of adjuvant therapies to breast cancer patients appears to be facilitated by better integration of care and services within the hospitals we studied. A fully integrated EHR and enhanced processes for tracking no shows and supporting handoffs seemed to increase integration in these hospitals. Integration was further facilitated when there was accountability for results. Strong clinical leadership can promote integration, but its impact may be lessened if hospitals’ processes are integrated. [Table: see text]

Understanding Disparities in Breast Cancer Care in Memphis, Tennessee

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. 620-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena P. Lamb ◽  
F. Elizabeth Pritchard ◽  
Simonne S. Nouer ◽  
Elizabeth A. Tolley ◽  
Brandon S. Boyd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
White Women ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Care ◽  
Black Patients ◽  
White Patients

Although significant progress has been made in improving breast cancer survival, disparities among racial, ethnic, and underserved groups still exist. The goal of this investigation is to quantify racial disparities in the context of breast cancer care, examining the outcomes of recurrence and mortality in the city of Memphis. Patients with a biopsy-proven diagnosis of breast cancer from January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2012, were obtained from the tumor registry. Black patients were more likely to have advanced (II, III, or IV) clinical stage of breast cancer at diagnosis versus white patients. Black breast cancer patients had a two times higher odds of recurrence (95% confidence interval: 1.4, 3.0) after adjusting for race and clinical stage. Black breast cancer patients were 1.5 times more likely to die (95% confidence interval: 1.2, 1.8), after adjusting for race; age at diagnosis; clinical stage; ER, PR, HER2 status; and recurrence. Black women with stages 0, I, II, and III breast cancer all had a statistically significant longer median time from diagnosis to surgery than white women. Black patients were more likely to have advanced clinical stages of breast cancer at diagnosis versus white patients on a citywide level in Memphis. Black breast cancer patients have higher odds of recurrence and mortality when compared with white breast cancer patients, after adjusting for appropriate demographic and clinical attributes. More work is needed to develop, evaluate, and disseminate interventions to decrease inequities in timeliness of care for breast cancer patients.

Quality of care for breast cancer patients in Japan: An analysis of the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6547-6547
Author(s):  
H. Mukai ◽  
T. Higashi ◽  
T. Iwase ◽  
T. Sobue
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Registry ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Care ◽  
Recommended Care ◽  
Adherence Score ◽  
Breast Cancer Registry

6547 Background: In Japan, growing concern that patients do not receive optimum care led to the enactment of the Cancer Control Act in 2006, which mandates the government to undertake initiatives in ensuring the quality of cancer care. Here, we evaluated the current status of breast cancer care in Japan using process-of-care quality indicators (QIs) for breast cancer care. Methods: Combining clinical evidence and expert opinion, we developed 45 QIs covering the continuum of breast cancer care from initial evaluation to follow-up. Each QI describes standards of a particular aspect of care, and its score is calculated as the percentage of applicable patients who received the recommended care (adherence score). Of the 45 QIs, 7 could be scored using data in the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry, which covers about 40% of all Japanese breast cancer patients and has been continuously maintained since 1975. Results: The study population included 15,227 patients registered by 224 facilities in 2005. On average, patients received 72.1% of recommended care. However, substantial variation in adherence was seen across QIs (21–98%). Adherence score was less than 85% in five of seven QIs. Variation across facilities was observed in six QIs. Conclusions: The quality of breast cancer care in Japan has room for improvement in many aspects of care. Although the amount of data in the cancer registry suitable for quality assessment is limited, it is useful in detecting quality problems. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Integration of breast cancer care in a middle-income country: learning from Suandok Breast Cancer Network (SBCN)

BMC Cancer ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imjai Chitapanarux ◽  
Wimrak Onchan ◽  
Panchaporn Wongmaneerung ◽  
Areewan Somwangprasert ◽  
Nongnuch Bunyoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Care ◽  
Chiang Mai ◽  
Northern Thailand ◽  
Middle Income ◽  
Cancer Network

Abstract Background Breast cancer incidence in Northern Thailand has shown a continuous increase since records began in 1983. In 2002 the urgency of the situation prompted Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital to initiate the Suandok Breast Cancer Network (SBCN). Methods The SBCN is a not-for-profit organization in the university hospital which serves as a training and education center and provides highly specialized medical care for patients in Chiang Mai and in 5 provinces of northern Thailand, with the key mission of improving breast cancer care. The short-term goal was to overcome the barriers to engagement with breast cancer and its treatment and the long-term goal was to increase the overall survival rate of breast cancer patients in our region. Results We enrolled breast cancer patients treated at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital between January 2006 and December 2015 and divided into 2 cohorts: 1485 patients who were diagnosed from 2006 to 2009 (cohort 1: early implementation of SBCN) and 2383 patients who were diagnosed from 2010 to 2015 (cohort 2: full implementation of SBCN). Criteria to measure improved cancer waiting time (CWT) would include: time to diagnosis, time to surgery, and time to radiotherapy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of the cohort 2 was higher than that in cohort 1, at 73.8 (72.0–75.5) compared to 71.5 (69.2–73.7) (p-value = 0.03). Conclusions Reasons behind the success of project include the uniformity of care encouragement, service network development and timely access to each step of breast cancer management. The model used in SBCN could be adopted as a learning guide to improve healthcare access and outcome for breast cancer patients in low- to middle-income countries.

scholarly journals Breast cancer care in Alberta: a Patients perspective

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alysha Crocker ◽  
Susan Anderes ◽  
Linda Verbeek ◽  
Janice Chobanuk ◽  
David W Olson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Breast Surgery ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Care ◽  
Quality Healthcare ◽  
Imaging Result ◽  
Email Address ◽  
Patient Reported

IntroductionEach year in Alberta, over 2,300 women are affected by breast cancer. In Alberta, a multi-year Breast Health Initiative is underway to improve breast cancer care; reduce wait times, coordinate care, and enhance patient experience. Patient reported experience measurements are important to inform and advance patient and family-centred care. Objectives and ApproachThe aim is to assess breast cancer patients’ experiences at two survey points; after surgeon consult and after breast surgery. Patients meeting inclusion criteria; highly suspicious of cancer on imaging result (i.e. BI-RADS 5), referral to Calgary or Edmonton breast program, English speaking, and having an email address are recruited by RN coordinators or nurse navigators. Automated survey invitations from REDCap are used. Seven days after the surgeon consult the first survey is sent and seven days after breast surgery the second survey is sent. ResultsPatient recruitment began November 27, 2017 and January 2, 2018 for Edmonton and Calgary, respectively. As of February, 2018, 45 patients had been recruited. Of these, the first survey was sent to 34 (i.e. seven days post surgeon consult) and 19 (56%) had completed the survey. All those eligible (18) agreed to participate in the upcoming second survey. Of those, six had provided their surgery date and the second survey which both were completed. Recruitment is ongoing until the conference, at that time there will be sufficient numbers to report findings. Conclusion/ImplicationsPatient and family-centred care is an element of high-quality healthcare which AHS has identified as a priority. These results will report on the breast cancer patients’ perspectives and generate important information for clinicians and administrators to use for decision making and quality improvement of health services.

Evaluation of Patterns in Access to Breast Cancer Care and Breast Cancer Presentation in a Safety Net Patient Population

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482096628
Author(s):  
Erica Choe ◽  
Hayoung Park ◽  
Ma’at Hembrick ◽  
Christine Dauphine ◽  
Junko Ozao-Choy
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Patient Population ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Minority Women ◽  
Breast Cancer Care ◽  
Safety Net Hospital ◽  
Screening Mammograms

Background While prior studies have shown the apparent health disparities in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, there is a gap in knowledge with respect to access to breast cancer care among minority women. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer from 2014 to 2016 to evaluate how patients presented and accessed cancer care services in our urban safety net hospital. Patient demographics, cancer stage, history of breast cancer screening, and process of referral to cancer care were collected and analyzed. Results Of the 202 patients identified, 61 (30%) patients were younger than the age of 50 and 75 (63%) were of racial minority background. Only 39% of patients with a new breast cancer were diagnosed on screening mammogram. Women younger than the age of 50 ( P < .001) and minority women ( P < .001) were significantly less likely to have had any prior screening mammograms. Furthermore, in patients who met the screening guideline age, more than half did not have prior screening mammograms. Discussion Future research should explore how to improve breast cancer screening rates within our county patient population and the potential need for revision of screening guidelines for minority patients.

Communication Between Physicians and Older Women With Localized Breast Cancer: Implications for Treatment and Patient Satisfaction

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1008-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenchi Liang ◽  
Caroline B. Burnett ◽  
Julia H. Rowland ◽  
Neal J. Meropol ◽  
Lynne Eggert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Treatment Choice ◽  
Satisfaction With Care ◽  
Physician Communication ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Actual Treatment ◽  
The Impact

PURPOSE: To identify factors associated with patient-physician communication and to examine the impact of communication on patients’ perception of having a treatment choice, actual treatment received, and satisfaction with care among older breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 613 pairs of surgeons and their older (≥ 67 years) patients diagnosed with localized breast cancer. Measures of patients’ self-reported communication included physician- and patient-initiated communication and the number of treatment options discussed. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationships between communication and outcomes. RESULTS: Patients who reported that their surgeons mentioned more treatment options were 2.21 times (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.62 to 3.01) more likely to report being given a treatment choice, and 1.33 times (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.73) more likely to get breast-conserving surgery with radiation than other types of treatment. Surgeons who were trained in surgical oncology, or who treated a high volume of breast cancer patients (≥ 75% of practice), were more likely to initiate communication with patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.56; and OR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.76, respectively). A high degree of physician-initiated communication, in turn, was associated with patients’ perception of having a treatment choice (OR = 2.46; 95% CI, 1.29 to 4.70), and satisfaction with breast cancer care (OR = 2.13; 95% CI, 1.17 to 3.85) in the 3 to 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Greater patient-physician communication was associated with a sense of choice, actual treatment, and satisfaction with care. Technical information and caring components of communication impacted outcomes differently. Thus, the quality of cancer care for older breast cancer patients may be improved through interventions that improve communication within the physician-patient dyad.

Breast cancer: Global quality care

2019 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Best Practices ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Breast Cancer Care ◽  
Global Quality ◽  
Care Systems

Caregivers delivering care to breast cancer patients wish to provide the highest quality breast care possible. Due to the complexity of the care pathway, this care should be delivered by a multidisciplinary team working in a breast cancer unit/centre. This book was written by experts from different disciplines and presents ideas for developing a breast unit wherever you live. The authors provide thorough descriptions of high-quality breast cancer care, define targets, methods to assess one’s care, and ideas on how to improve care within one’s resources. A global view of the quality of breast cancer care shows specific best practices applicable to many centres operating in various health care systems with different financial and political situations. Foundation hallmarks of innovation, communication, patient-centred care, multidisciplinary, and budget considerations guide specific recommendations for each component of care. This book discusses global and local considerations so that optimally ‘integrated’ breast cancer care can be organized. Each component of care (e.g. imaging, surgery, etc.) is discussed from both theoretical and practical aspects. The recommendation for each component of care is facilitated by experienced experts laying out rational and practical approaches to each step. This book provides guidance how to integrate the different disciplines into breast cancer care. Beyond treatment, it provides practical considerations regarding accreditation and certification, and it comments on the influence of budget and of treatment. Finally, it demonstrates how best practices may be altered by the emerging involvement of patients, technologies, and transitions of future societal values.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document