Development and internal validation of a prognostic nomogram for overall survival in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) treated with pazopanib (PAZ).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 380-380
Author(s):  
Michael W. Kattan ◽  
Debasis Chakrabarti ◽  
Kamalnayan Bhatt ◽  
Faisal Mehmud ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
...  

380 Background: PAZ, an oral multikinase inhibitor, demonstrated significant improvement in PFS over placebo in patients with aRCC in a randomized, phase III trial (J Clin Oncol 2009:29; 475). The purpose of this study was to develop and internally validate a prognostic nomogram based on the outcome data from phase III trial for predicting the probability of 12-month OS for treatment-naïve and cytokine-pretreated aRCC patients who received PAZ. Methods: Statistical modeling was performed on a dataset consisting of 281 patients from the PAZ arm of the phase III trial. Missing values were first imputed using multiple imputation with chained equations. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was fit using routinely available predictors thought to be prognostic based on clinical judgment. These predictors included the neutrophil count relative to ULN, platelet count relative to ULN, LDH relative to ULN, alkaline phosphatase relative to ULN, corrected calcium, albumin, hemoglobin, ECOG performance status, months from diagnosis to treatment, number of metastatic sites, and presence of lung, liver and bone metastases. Bootstrap-corrected estimates of discrimination and calibration in the small were calculated following 1,000 resamples. The Cox model was plotted as a nomogram. Results: A prognostic nomogram was developed and internally validated for predicting the probability of 12-month OS in aRCC patients based on a Cox regression model using 13 predictor variables. Calibration plots suggested reasonable correspondence between predicted probabilities and actual proportions of OS. The bootstrap-corrected concordance index, a measure of discrimination, was 0.70. When examining the nomogram, albumin appeared to have the greatest potential influence on predicted OS. Months from diagnosis to treatment and corrected calcium level seemed to be the next most potentially influential predictors. Conclusions: The nomogram predicts with reasonable accuracy and should facilitate treatment decision making for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Validation in a separate dataset is planned.

The Lancet ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 372 (9637) ◽  
pp. 449-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J Motzer ◽  
Bernard Escudier ◽  
Stéphane Oudard ◽  
Thomas E Hutson ◽  
Camillo Porta ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 245 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Bukowski ◽  
D. Heng ◽  
T. Eisen ◽  
C. Szczylik ◽  
W.M. Stadler ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (35) ◽  
pp. 3916-3923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Motzer ◽  
Naomi B. Haas ◽  
Frede Donskov ◽  
Marine Gross-Goupil ◽  
Sergei Varlamov ◽  
...  

Purpose This phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of pazopanib versus placebo in patients with locally advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk for relapse after nephrectomy. Patients and Methods A total of 1,538 patients with resected pT2 (high grade) or ≥ pT3, including N1, clear cell RCC were randomly assigned to pazopanib or placebo for 1 year; 403 patients received a starting dose of 800 mg or placebo. To address toxicity attrition, the 800-mg starting dose was lowered to 600 mg, and the primary end point analysis was changed to disease-free survival (DFS) for pazopanib 600 mg versus placebo (n = 1,135). Primary analysis was performed after 350 DFS events in the intent-to-treat (ITT) pazopanib 600 mg group (ITT600mg), and DFS follow-up analysis was performed 12 months later. Secondary end point analyses included DFS with ITT pazopanib 800 mg (ITT800mg) and safety. Results The primary analysis results of DFS ITT600mg favored pazopanib but did not show a significant improvement over placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.06; P = .165). The secondary analysis of DFS in ITT800mg (n = 403) yielded an HR of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.51 to 0.94). Follow-up analysis in ITT600mg yielded an HR of 0.94 (95% CI, 0.77 to 1.14). Increased ALT and AST were common adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation in the pazopanib 600 mg (ALT, 16%; AST, 5%) and 800 mg (ALT, 18%; AST, 7%) groups. Conclusion The results of the primary DFS analysis of pazopanib 600 mg showed no benefit over placebo in the adjuvant setting.


2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 237 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Eisen ◽  
R. Bukowski ◽  
M. Staehler ◽  
C. Szczylik ◽  
S. Oudard ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document