The FRAX score as a tool for estimating fracture risk in patients with advanced prostate cancer on androgen-deprivation therapy compared to the conventional T-score.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16023-e16023
Author(s):  
Marc Nicolas Bienz ◽  
Herbert James ◽  
Ilija Aleksic ◽  
Christopher Michael Pieczonka ◽  
Peter Iannotta ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 185 (6) ◽  
pp. 2430-2432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Langley ◽  
Fay H. Cafferty ◽  
Philip A. Pollock ◽  
Patricia Price ◽  
Paul D. Abel

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 24-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Gunner ◽  
Aziz Gulamhusein ◽  
Derek J Rosario

Introduction: Approximately 50% of men diagnosed with prostate cancer will be exposed to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) at some stage. The role of ADT in the management of metastatic disease has long been recognised, and its place in the management of localised and locally advanced disease has become clearer in the past few years. Nevertheless, concerns remain that some men might not benefit from ADT in earlier-stage disease. The purpose of the current article is to provide a brief narrative review of the role of ADT as part of a strategy of treatment with curative intent, concentrating mainly on key recent developments in the area. Methods: Narrative literature review of key publications in the English language relating to ADT in the management of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer. Results: In locally advanced and high-risk localised prostate cancer, the use of ADT in combination with radiotherapy improves disease-specific and overall survival. There is no evidence to support the use of ADT in the treatment of low-risk localised prostate cancer. There appears to be an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists, particularly in men with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, but the relevance of this in the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting is currently unclear. Conclusions: Future studies should focus on identification of men who are at risk from cardiovascular complications associated with ADT and on the comparison of radiotherapy with ADT versus surgery in the management of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer, particularly with regards to men with pre-existing comorbidities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 382 (23) ◽  
pp. 2187-2196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal D. Shore ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Michael S. Cookson ◽  
Daniel J. George ◽  
Daniel R. Saltzstein ◽  
...  

The Prostate ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal D. Shore ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Michael S. Cookson ◽  
E. David Crawford ◽  
Alicia K. Morgans ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Mousa ◽  
Michele Petrovic ◽  
Neil E. Fleshner

Introduction: Prostate cancer patients receiving androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) often experience a combination of disease symptoms and treatment side effects. The therapeutic use of cannabis to alleviate these side effects has not been studied, despite increasing patient interest. With the increasing availability of cannabis, it is important for clinicians to understand the prevalence, predictors, and perceived benefits of cannabis use among patients with prostate cancer. Methods: A total of 222 men undergoing ADT were assessed in this two-part study. In part one, the cannabis-use questionnaire was administered to 56 men, probing demographics, usage habits, perspectives, and degrees of symptom relief related to cannabis use. In part two, 191 cryopreserved urine samples were retrieved and analyzed for the presence of tetrahydrocannabidiol (THC) metabolite 11-nor-Δ9-THC-COOH. The respondents were then stratified into two groups, users vs. non-users, and statistical analyses were conducted. Results: Questionnaire data revealed that 23.2% of surveyed men had recently used cannabis. In contrast, 5.8% of men had detectable levels of THC metabolite in their urine. Combined questionnaire and urine data revealed that cannabis users were significantly younger (p=0.003) and had lower testosterone levels (p=0.003) than non-users. The majority of men experiencing common ADT side effects reported some degree of relief following cannabis use. Conclusions: Cannabis use among men with advanced prostate cancer receiving ADT is more prevalent than in the general population and the majority of other oncological cohorts. Lower testosterone levels and reported therapeutic benefit among cannabis users warrants confirmation in appropriate clinical trials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document