Correlation between standardized uptake value in pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and tumor regression grade in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 150-150
Author(s):  
Kathryn Baksh ◽  
Khaldoun Almhanna

150 Background: A multimodality approach with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation is the standard of care in the United States in the treatment of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. It is well established that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in these patients can facilitate downstaging, correlating with pathologic response, and improving overall survival. Our clinical practice involves the use of positron emission tomography (PET) to assist with staging in patients prior to undergoing neoadjuvant CRT and surgery. While there has been evidence showing correlation between tumor regression grade (TRG) and increased overall survival in these patients, the relationship between standardized uptake values on PET scans and TRG has not been discerned. The purpose of this study was to determine whether pre and post-chemoradiotherapy SUV on PET scans correlate with TRG in esophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Methods: A retrospective review of 56 patients with stage II-III esophageal cancer treated with neo-adjuvant CRT followed by surgery was performed. Pre- and post- treatment PET scans were reviewed. Maximum SUV at the site of the primary tumor was recorded. Upon completion of surgery, tumor regression grade was determined by a specialized pathologist. Spearman correlation was used to compare pre, post, and change in max SUV, to the 4 level TRG variables. Results: The median follow-up was 24 months. No significant correlation was found between pre-treatment or post treatment SUV and TRG with p value of 0.73 and 0.94 respectively. There was no significant correlation between decreased FDG uptake following CRT and TRG with p value of 0.82. Consistent with previous data, TRG predicted the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis for patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Our results are preliminary and retrospective in nature. A larger sample is needed to confirm these findings. Decreased FDG uptake in sequential PET scans strongly correlates with tumor response, but is not accurate enough to predict pathological response.

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15185-15185
Author(s):  
A. A. Syed ◽  
A. Jamshed ◽  
B. Muhammad ◽  
R. Azhar ◽  
M. A. Yusuf ◽  
...  

15185 Background: The prognosis of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer is poor. TMT for locally advanced esophageal cancer is being utilized with increasing frequency. In this study, we investigate the prognostic factors influencing survival in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer following TMT. Methods: The study included 22 patients with esophageal carcinoma treated between January 2003 and December 2005 at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Hospital and Research Centre. Median age was 49 years (range 26 - 68). There were 15 (68%) males and 7 (32%) females. All patients had EGD with biopsy and CT chest. Twelve (54.5%) had squamous cell carcinoma and 10 (45.5%) patients had adenocarcinoma. Five patients (23%) had tumour in the middle third and 17 (77%) had lower/gastroesophageal lesions. Preoperative radiation consisted of 50.4 Gy / 28 fractions with concomitant chemotherapy day 1 and 29 (Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1 and infusional 5FU 1000 mg/m2 day 1–5). Esophagectomy was done at 6 - 12 weeks following chemoradiation. The pathologic down-staging was evaluated by the 5-score tumor regression grade (TRG) of Mandard. Results: Post TMT pathologic TNM stage was; Stage 0 in 8 pts (36%), stage II in 5 pts (23%) and stage III in 9 pts (41%). 13 (59%) pts had R0 and 9 (41%) pts had R1 resection. The 4-year disease free survival was 29% with a median survival of 19 months. The number of patients with TRG score 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were 7 (32%), 4 (18%), 5 (23%), 2 (9%) and 4 (18%) respectively. Tumor regression grade 1–2 (p=.0016) and negative circumferential margins >2 mm (p=.0019) had a positive influence on DFS. Age (< 50 vs ≥ 50 years), sex, hemoglobin at presentation (≤ 12 vs > 12 gm/dl), tumor site (middle vs lower/GE junction), pathological nodal status (node positive vs node negative) and histological subtype (squamous cell vs adenocarcinoma) did not influence survival (p= 0.92, p= 0.82, p= 0.69, p= 0.79, p= 0.41 and p= 0.32 respectively). Conclusions: TMT results in prolonged disease free survival in patients with complete response or microscopic residual foci (TRG 1–2). Positive or circumferential margins <2mm is associated with poor prognosis. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 173
Author(s):  
Eelke L.A. Toxopeus ◽  
Femke M. de Man ◽  
Nanda Krak ◽  
Katharina Biermann ◽  
Annemieke J.M. Nieuweboer ◽  
...  

Inter-individual variability in paclitaxel pharmacokinetics may play a role in the response to chemotherapy. Therefore, we studied the association between paclitaxel clearance and treatment response in patients with esophageal cancer. All patients who received paclitaxel (plus carboplatin) treatment for esophageal cancer between 2007 and 2013 were included. The treatment was given as neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), induction chemotherapy (iCT), or palliative chemotherapy (pCT). The treatment response was assessed by the tumor regression grade (TRG) or by the RECIST1.1 criteria, respectively. The unbound paclitaxel clearance (CL) was estimated with NONMEM. The log-transformed clearance was related to response with ANOVA and independent sample t-tests. A total of 166 patients were included, of whom 113 received nCRT, 23 iCT and 30 pCT. In patients receiving nCRT, paclitaxel clearance was not associated with tumor regression grade (p-value = 0.25), nor with pathologically complete response (geometric mean 561.6 L/h) and residual disease (geometric mean 566.1 L/h, p-value = 0.90). In patients who underwent iCT or pCT, also no association between paclitaxel clearance and RECIST outcome was identified (iCT: p-value = 0.08 and pCT: p-value = 0.81, respectively). In conclusion, systemic paclitaxel exposure was not associated with response to common paclitaxel-based treatment regimens for esophageal cancer. Future studies should focus on tumor exposure in relation to systemic exposure and treatment outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document