FOLFOX and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) for advanced pancreatic cancer: A phase I study.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 258-258
Author(s):  
Howard Safran ◽  
Kevin Charpentier ◽  
Kimberly Perez ◽  
Kalyan Mantripragada ◽  
Trevor Clark Austin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

258 Background: FOLFIRINOX improves survival in advanced pancreatic cancer, however the contribution of irinotecan is uncertain. The addition of irinotecan to gemcitabine was not superior to gemcitabine alone in pancreatic cancer, however nab-P demonstrates a survival benefit. This phase I study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the addition of nab-P to fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-A). Methods: Patients with metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma without prior treatment received oxaliplatin, 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 and 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 with 3 dose levels of nab-P (125, 150 and 175 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. Pegfilgrastim was required during the first 2 cycles. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined in the first 2 cycles of treatment. Results: Fifteen patients were entered: Dose level 1 (n=6), dose level 2 (N=6), dose level 3 (N=3). The median age was 64 (35-81). Ten patients had metastatic and 5 had locally advanced disease. DLTs of nausea and fatigue occurred in 2 of 3 patients at dose level 3. Two patients developed grade 3 neuropathy after >= 10 cycles of treatment. One patient had grade 3/4 neutropenia. Eight of fifteen patients (53%) had a partial response. Conclusions: The MTD of nab-P is 150mg/m2 every 2 weeks with FOLFOX. Cumulative peripheral neuropathy, similar to other FOLFOX regimens, is the most significant toxicity generally occurring after >= 10 cycles of treatment. FOLFOX-A has substantial activity and may represent a promising regimen in pancreatic cancer. Patients are currently being accrued to an expansion phase utilizing dose level 2. Supported by the Davis and Browning families and LIFEcycle. Clinical trial information: NCT01744353.

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine plus S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy in patients of unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 261-261
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
Kazuhiro Katayama ◽  
Nobuko Ishida ◽  
Hironari Sueyoshi ◽  
Ryoji Takada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 2

261 Background: We conducted chemoradiotherapy of gemcitabine plus S-1, key drugs for pancreatic cancer. Methods: Patients were eligible for the study if they had received a histopathological diagnosis of locally advanced pancreatic cancer and were diagnosed as unresectable by multiple clinicians including surgeons due to main arterial invasions and more. Radiation (RT) was perfomed for twenty-eight days continuously except Saturday, Sunday and National holiday in 1.8Gy once daily (total 50.4Gy). PTV was defined as GTV plus 10-15mm. Prophylactic irradiation to regional lymph nodes was not performed. Administration level of the anti-cancer drugs was referred to the following table. Results: A total of fifteen cases were enrolled to the phase I study from February, 2006 through May, 2007. RT was achieved in 13 of 15 cases (87%). Two cases of DLT occurred in level 2 (two cases of emesis) while three did in level 3 (one case of emesis and two of neutropenia of grade 4). We decided level 3 as MTD and level 2 as recommended dose. The overall response rate (more than PR) was 33.3% (5 in 15 cases) and tumor-control (more than SD) was achieved in 13 of 15 cases (87%). The one-year and two-year survival rate was 86.7% and 44.4%, respectively. Conclusions: We conducted the phase 1 study of chemoradiotherapy with two key drugs of pancreatic cancer and achieved the recommended dose in this phase I study. Ongoing study We have already finished the enrollment of 110 cases for a phase II randomized allocated study, comparing the chemoradiotherapy of administration dose decided in this phase 1 study with the combination therapy of gemcitabine plus S-1. Now we are carefully following the patients to compare two-year survival rate as a primary endpoint in phase II study. Clinical trial information: NCT01430052.

Phase I study of chemoradiation therapy (nab-paclitaxel/Gemcitabine) in 15 patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (UR-LAPC).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 475-475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hironari Sueyoshi ◽  
Tatsuya Ioka ◽  
Takeshi Tamura ◽  
Ryoji Takada ◽  
Nobuyasu Fukutake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 2

475 Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is one of the most difficult cancers to treat. Over 90% of cases, they are UR-LAPC or metastatic PC (mPC) at the first time of diagnosis. To prolong survival time, radiation therapy is considered to be promising with strong local control. Some papers reported that RT with 5-FU is effective to LAPC, but they are far from standard regimen. Gemcitabine (Gem) has enhancing effect of sensibility to RT. Gem and nab-paclitaxel (G+NP) showed priority compared with Gem monotherapy in mPC patients with Phase III study. So, we performed Phase I study to decide recommended dose of G+NP when we administer for concurrent CRT in URPC patients. Methods: From Aug 2013, we have registered patients who were examined as UR-LAPC because of cancer invasion to major artery. Dose of G+NP are classified by each level. At Level 1, Gem 600mg/m2 and NP 50mg/m2. At Level 2, Gem 600mg/m2 and NP 75mg/m2. At Level 3, Gem 600mg/m2 and NP 100mg/m2. At each level, patients accepted RT (50.4Gy/28fr). During performing RT period, we prescribed G + NP weekly. So, G+NP are prescribed 4-5 times if pts accomplish the study.We evaluate effectiveness and side effect of the regimen, and try to decide maximum tolerated dose. Results: Until July 2014, 14 pts (11 males and 3 females) have been registered in this trial. 6 cases were performed at Level 1, 7cases at Level 2, 1 cases at Level 3. 13 cases accomplish the prescription. 1 case at Level 1 dropped out because the patient suffered liver abscess. Effectiveness of the regimen is as follows; 4cases are PD (progressive disease), 6cases are SD (stable disease), and 2cases are PR (partial response). Conclusions: Now we prescribe the regimen at Level 3. We have not yet decided MDT. But, CRT with G + NP may be promising regimen for LAPC. When we accumulate more cases, and decide MDT, we will report later. Clinical trial information: UMIN000012254.

Phase I trial of imexon, Inj. plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15058-15058
Author(s):  
S. J. Cohen ◽  
M. Zalupski ◽  
M. Modiano ◽  
P. Conkling ◽  
D. Mahadevan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pancreatic Cancer Cells ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
Ecog Ps

15058 Background: Imexon for inj. (Amplimexon®, AMP) is an aziridine-containing iminopyrrolidone which causes G2 arrest, accumulation of reactive oxygen species, and induction of apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. AMP demonstrated synergy with gemcitabine (GEM) in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. This phase I study of AMP plus GEM was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Secondary endpoints were pharmacokinetics for both agents (PK) and tumor response. Methods: Patients (pts) with previously untreated advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma received one of two dosing regimens. The first 19 received 30 minute AMP IV days 1–5 and 15–19 followed by 30 minute GEM IV days 1, 8 and 15 Q4 wks (Regimen A). Dosing was modified after 19 pts to administer both AMP and GEM over 30 minutes days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (Regimen B). Dose levels (AMP/GEM, in mg/m2) for Regimen A: 200/800, 280/800, 200/1000, and 280/1000, and for Regimen B: 280/1000, 335/1000, 390/1000, 540/1000, and 750/1000. The current cohort is 1000/1000. Pts were assessed for response after cycles 2, 5 and 8. PK and pharmacodynamic (plasma thiol depletion) measurements were obtained during cycle one. Results: Forty-six pts have been treated to date, with 36 having complete toxicity data and evaluable. Pt characteristics: M/F (24/12), Age (mean 60.4 years, range 43–75), ECOG PS 0/1 (56%, 44%), metastatic/locally advanced (91%, 9%). The 36 pts have completed 122.5 cycles of therapy (median 2, range 0.5–12). Common toxicities: anemia (77%), fatigue (71%), nausea (60%), fever (54%), and leukopenia (54%). DLT were 1/6 at 280/1000 (Regimen A - febrile neutropenia), 1/6 at 280/1000 (Regimen B - gr 3 hypotension, gr 4 renal failure), and 1/9 at 390/1000 (gr 3 hyperbilirubinemia). Accrual continues at 1000/1000. Of 36 pts, 4 have had partial responses and 14 stable disease. PK and plasma thiol analysis are ongoing. Conclusions: Imexon can be administered safely with full dose gemcitabine. Accrual continues to define the combination MTD. The response rate in this phase I study compares favorably with historical gemcitabine monotherapy, and further phase II evaluation of this combination in advanced pancreatic cancer is warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I study of oxaliplatin, full-dose gemcitabine and concurrent radiation therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4107-4107 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Desai ◽  
E. Ben-Josef ◽  
T. J. Lawrence ◽  
I. R. Francis ◽  
J. K. Greenson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Synergistic Cytotoxicity ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Gi Bleed

4107 Background: We previously demonstrated safety and efficacy of full dose gemcitabine (GEM) and radiation therapy (RT) in patients (pts) with pancreatic cancer (PC). Our preclinical studies have shown that GEM with oxaliplatin (OX) preserves radiosensitization with synergistic cytotoxicity. To enhance local and systemic treatment effects, we initiated a study of OX and GEM with concurrent RT. Methods: Pts with untreated PC received up to 4 cycles of GEM day 1, 8, 15 and OX days 1, 15 repeated at 28 day intervals. RT (27 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions to gross tumor volume with 1 cm margin) was given during cycle 1 and repeated in cycle 4. Surgery occurred after cycle 2 in resectable pts. Dose escalation was guided using time-to-event continuous reassessment method (TITE-CRM). Dose levels 1–4 GEM 1 g/m2 IV over 30 min and OX 40, 55, 70, 85 mg/m2 IV over 90 min; dose level 5, 6 OX dose remained 85 mg/m2 but infusion time for GEM 1 g/m2 was increased to 65, 100 min, respectively. Trial objective is to determine dose level associated with DLT thru cycle 2 in ≤ 20% of pts; planned accrual is 40 pts evaluable for DLT. Results: 40 pts have been enrolled (median age 63, men/women 26/14) with resectable (10), unresectable (27), and metastatic (3) PC. 29 pts have completed 2 cycles and 11 pts 4 cycles. After 2 cycles CA19–9 decreased > 50% in 14 of 24 evaluable pts (58%). Six of 8 explored pts underwent margin negative resection with 1 path CR and 2 with small residual microscopic foci only. Per RECIST, CT response of the primary lesion after 2 cycles included 3 PR, 23 SD and 1 PD. Two additional PR were seen after cycle 4. Thirty pts are presently evaluable for DLT; 7 pts have suffered DLT including grade 4 platelets (4), decline in PS (2), GI bleed (1) and grade 3 weight loss (1). Current estimated probability of DLT is 21% (95% CI 11%,34%) for dose level 3 and 24% (95% CI 13%,37%) for dose level 4. Conclusions: The addition of OX 70–85 mg/m2 days 1, 15 to full dose GEM based RT is tolerable and efficacious. A neoadjuvant phase II study in resectable PC using the MTD defined in this phase I study is planned. Supported by Sanofi-Aventis. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Su1367 PHASE I STUDY OF EUS-GUIDED PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB323-AB324
Author(s):  
John M. DeWitt ◽  
Kumar Sandrasegaran ◽  
Susan Perkins ◽  
Bert O'Neil ◽  
Michael G. House ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Photodynamic Therapy ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Phase I Study of Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin and Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin Plus Cytarabine (ARA-C) in Patients (PTS) with Relapsed and Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), and Myeloid Blast Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1809-1809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajolil ◽  
William Wierda ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Farhad Ravandi-Kashani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Acute Leukemias ◽  
First Remission ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Phase I and II clinical studies demonstrated activity of Clofarabine in acute leukemias. In previous studies we have investigated clofarabine, plus ara-C combinations and reported a CR rate of 24% in relapsed AML and 52% in previously untreated AML ≥ 50 years (yrs) with acceptable toxicity profile. Anthracyclines are active in AML. To explore clofarabine further in AML combinations we conducted a phase I study of clofarabine with idarubicin with or without ara-C in pts with relapsed AML, MDS, and CML. Considered as dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are ≥ grade 3 drug-related toxicities. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be determined by “3+3” dose escalation scheme. On the clofarabine (C)/idarubicin (I) combination (CI), 9 AML pts are enrolled (2 primary refractory, 7 first relapse). Median age: 58 yrs (range 24–71). Median first remission duration (CRD1): 3.1 mos. (0–7.6). For the first dose level, C was given at 22.5mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d and I at 12mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d. Among the first 6 pts, 2 ≥ gr. 3 toxicities (diarrhea, rash, ↑ bili) occurred necessitating dose de-escalation of C to 15mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5 and I 8mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3. Among 3 pts, 1 ≥ gr.3 toxicity (↑ bili) was observed. No responses occurred. On the CI + ara-C arm (CIA), 7 AML pts are enrolled (1 primary refractory, 6 first relapse). Median age: 58 yrs. (24–78). Median CRD1: 11.2 mos. (0–13.1). First dose level: C 22.5mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d, I 8mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d, A 1g/m2 i.v. daily x 5d. Of 3 pts, 2 developed ≥ gr.3 toxicities (↑ bili, diarrhea) leading to the following de-escalation: C 15mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d, I 6mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d, A 0.75g/m2 i.v. daily x 5d. Of 4 pts (1 ≥ gr. 3 rash, ↑ bili), 3 pts achieved CR. The phase I study is ongoing until determination of DLT and MTD for each arm. Our preliminary results indicate clinical activity of CIA even at the low dose level.

Oxaliplatin, Fludarabine, Cytarabine, and Rituximab Combination Therapy Induces High Response Rates in Agressive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Richter's Syndrome (RS).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3443-3443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou ◽  
William Wierda ◽  
William Plunkett ◽  
Susan O'Brien ◽  
Thomas J. Kipps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

Abstract Abstract 3443 Poster Board III-331 Introduction The first Phase I-II clinical trial of oxaliplatin, fluradabine, cytarabine (Ara-C), and rituximab (OFAR1) demonstrated significant activity in refractory CLL and RS (Tsimberidou et al, J Clin Oncol, 2008;26:196). To enhance the response rate and decrease myelosuppression, the dose of oxaliplatin was increased to 30mg daily, the dose of Ara-C was decreased to 0.5g/m2 daily and the optimal number of days of fluradabine and Ara-C administration was explored (OFAR2). Methods In a Phase I-II study of OFAR2, patients were treated with oxaliplatin 30mg/m2, D1-4; fludarabine 30mg/m2, Ara-C 0.5g/m2; rituximab 375mg/m2, D3; and pelfigrastim 6mg, D6. Fludarabine and Ara-C were given on D2-3 (dose level 1) D2-4 (dose level 2) or D2-5 (dose level 3); courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Patients received prophylaxis for tumor lysis, DNA viruses, and PCP. A “3+3” design was used and the planned number of patients in the Phase II was 90 (CLL, 60; RS, 30). Results Ninety-one patients (CLL, 67; RS, 24) have been treated to date: Phase I, 12 patients (by dose level: 1, n=3; 2, n=6; and 3, n=3). DLTs were noted in 2 of 3 patients on dose level 3 (G4 diarrhea, 1; G4 neutropenic sepsis, 1); thus, dose level 2 was the MTD. Seventy-nine patients (relapsed CLL, 58; RS, 19) have been treated in the Phase II portion of the study. Patient characteristics were as follows: age > 60 years, 65%; 17p deletion, 38%; 11q deletion, 13%; 13q deletion, 16%; trisomy 12, 21%; no findings, 12%; unmutated IgVH, 80%; ZAP70-positive, 75%; and CD38 ≥30%, 58%. Response in patients treated in the Phase II recommended dose is shown in Table (evaluable, 67). The overall response rates in patients with 17p and 11q deletions were 48% and 55%, respectively. The median survival duration was 21 months (CLL, 21 months; RS, 9.5 months). At 18 months, the survival rates in patients with 17p and 11q deletions were 66% and 76%, respectively. Twelve patients underwent stem cell transplantation after OFAR2 (as post-remission therapy, n=10; as salvage, n=2). Overall, 196 cycles were administered. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were noted in 63%, 72%, and 39% of patients and in 57%, 70%, and 25% of cycles and Grade 3-4 infections in 19% of patients. Conclusion Preliminary results demonstrated that OFAR2 induced response in 40% of patients with RS and 63% of patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. OFAR2 had antileukemic activity in patients with 17p deletion. Clinical outcomes appeared to be superior to those of OFAR1 in refractory CLL, whereas results of OFAR1 appeared to be superior to those of OFAR2 in RS. Accrual is ongoing. Disclosures Tsimberidou: ASCO: ASCO Career Development Award; Sanofi: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Oxaliplatin is used off-label. Wierda:Genentech: Honoraria; Bayer, Sanofi-Aventis, Abbott, GSK: Research Funding; GSK, Trubion, Ligand, Genentech, Medimmune, Abbot: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Plunkett:Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding. O'Brien:Genentech: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy. Kipps:NCI: Grant P01CA-81534.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document