Germline BRCA Mutations in a Large Clinic-Based Cohort of Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (28) ◽  
pp. 3124-3129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Spring Holter ◽  
Ayelet Borgida ◽  
Anna Dodd ◽  
Robert Grant ◽  
Kara Semotiuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Cancer Family ◽  
Cancer Family History ◽  
Testing Criteria

Purpose The main purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a consecutively ascertained clinic-based cohort of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and describe the clinical and family history characteristics. Patients and Methods Unselected, consecutive, incident patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were recruited at a single cancer center over a 2-year period. Participants provided blood for DNA analysis and cancer family history, and cancer treatment records were reviewed. DNA from all patients was analyzed by Sanger sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Results Three hundred six patients were eligible for analysis. Pathogenic germline BRCA mutations were identified in 14 patients (4.6%; 95% CI, 2.2% to 6.9%), including 11 patients with a BRCA2 mutation and three patients with a BRCA1 mutation. Having a cancer family history that met genetic testing criteria of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network or the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care or self-reporting as Ashkenazi Jewish was significantly associated with BRCA mutation carrier status (P = .02, P < .001, and P = .05, respectively). However, the majority of the BRCA mutation–positive patients did not actually meet these genetic testing criteria. Conclusion Pathogenic BRCA mutations were identified in 4.6% of a large cohort of clinic-based patients. Considering the implications for family members of BRCA carriers, and possibly tailored chemotherapeutic treatment of patients, our finding has implications for broader BRCA genetic testing for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BRCA mutations and their clinical relevance in unselected pancreatic cancer population.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16240-e16240
Author(s):  
Viola Barucca ◽  
Andrea Petricca Mancuso ◽  
Salvatore De Marco ◽  
Daniela Iacono ◽  
Carmelilia De Bernardo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Family History ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Personal History ◽  
First Line ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Cancer Family ◽  
Cancer Family History ◽  
Brca 2 ◽  
History Of

e16240 Background: Germline pathogenetic mutations in BRCA1/2 genes are described in pancreatic cancer patients (PCP) in about 5–9% of cases. The purpose of this study was to determine their relevance in an unselected consecutive cohort of PCP describing family and clinical history. Methods: Patients (pts) were recruited at a single cancer center from September 2019 to October 2020. Participants provided blood for DNA analysis; cancer family history and treatment records were reviewed; DNA was analyzed by Next Generation Sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for germline variants in BRCA1/2 Results: 69 pts were included, 61 (88,4%) with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer received first line chemotherapy and 38 (62%) were full eligible for BRCA analysis; 8 out of 69 pts were BRCA screened even if in adjuvant setting, 10 patients are still under evaluation. Out of the 38 first line screened PCP germline BRCA mutations were found in 9 (19%): 4 pts (8,7%) with pathogenetic BRCA-2 variants (subgroup 1 – S1) and 5 pts (10,8%) with variants of unknown significances (VUSs), i.e. c.5339T>C and c.5096G>A in BRCA1 (subgroup 2 – S2). Samples from 29 pts were established as BRCA wild-type (subgroup 3 – S3). Pathogenetic BRCA-2 variants were observed in 2 male and 2 female (median age, 61.5 years, range 48-69), 3 out 4 without family history of breast, ovarian and pancreatic cancer, one patient (pt) had ovarian cancer family history. All pts had a negative personal history of others cancers. All S1 pts received FOLFIRINOX regimen achieving one complete response, 2 partials responses and 1 disease progression with RECIST criteria. The S2 included 2 male and 3 female (median age, 61 years, range 45-70) 2 with family history of pancreatic cancer, no pt had personal history of others cancers; 2 pts had stable disease and 3 disease progression receiving platinum-based regimen (4 pts) and gemcitabine/nabpaclitaxel (1 pt), respectively. Platinum responders were observed only in the well known pathogenetic BRCA-2 variants group with twice a median progression-free survival (PFS, months -ms-) as compared to the one observed in VUSs group. (>6 C.I. 95% 2- >12 ms; vs 3 ms, 95% C.I. 3-12 ms). S3 included 9 male and 20 female, (median age, 66 years, range 42-78); 5 pts had family history of pancreatic or breast cancer, 5 pts had a personal history of other cancers (breast and thyroid). In this group,16 pts received a platinum based regimen and 12 pts have been treated without platinum based regimen. Conclusions: Our results suggest that: 1) BRCA pathogenetic mutations rate (8,7%) is in line with literature data and seems not to be related with family or personal history, and to be associated with a better outcome; 2) No BRCA mutations were detected in patients over 70 years. 3) VUSs subgroup do not seem to benefit from platinum-regimen.

Moving Toward Personalized Medicine: Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing of Women Newly Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 704-716 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison H. Trainer ◽  
Bettina Meiser ◽  
Kaaren Watts ◽  
Gillian Mitchell ◽  
Kathy Tucker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Mutation Frequency ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Brca2 Mutation ◽  
Age At Onset ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Germline Brca Mutation

Objectives:The presence of a germline BRCA mutation defines a genotype-specific group of women whose invasive ovarian cancer is associated with an increasingly well-defined prognostic and chemosensitivity biological profile. To determine the criteria that may be used to select patients for BRCA treatment-focused genetic testing, we performed a systemic literature search of studies that assessed BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation frequency in women with ovarian cancer unselected for family history. The results are discussed with regard to the added clinical value gained by identifying a germline BRCA mutation at the time of the ovarian cancer diagnosis.Methods:BRCA-related studies were identified in the CD-ROM databases PubMed (including MEDLINE), PsychINFO, and CINAHL and included in the review if they met the following criteria: they (a) assessed mutation frequency in women with ovarian cancer who were unselected for family history and ethnicity, (b) were published in a peer-review journal, (c) between January 1997 and October 2009, and (d) in the English language.Results:Studies investigating the prevalence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations in ovarian cancer patients unselected for family history or ethnicity have found a pathological BRCA mutation rate of approximately 3% to 17%. Without a significant family history, specific features that may be used to target treatment-focused BRCA testing in the ovarian cancer setting include young age at onset (<50 years), high-grade serous tumor histology, and specific ethnicity associated with known BRCA founder mutations.Conclusions:We believe that given the growing appreciation of the prognostic significance of BRCA mutations and the differential chemosensitivity shown by these tumors, as well as the potential of novel agents such as poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, the identification of a germline BRCA mutation concurrent with a new diagnosis of ovarian cancer will significantly impact on tailoring personalized ovarian management in the future.

Quality of cancer family history and referral for genetic counseling and testing among oncology practices: A pilot test of quality measures as part of the ASCO Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. CRA1505-CRA1505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Wood ◽  
Pamela Kadlubek ◽  
Karen H. Lu ◽  
Dana Wollins ◽  
Jeffrey N. Weitzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Counseling ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Pilot Testing ◽  
Cancer Family ◽  
Referral Rates ◽  
Cancer Family History ◽  
Counseling And Testing ◽  
Oncology Practice

CRA1505 Background: The cancer family history (CFH) is an important tool for identification of individuals for genetic counseling/testing (GC/GT). Prior studies demonstrate a low rate of family history documentation and low referral rates for genetic counseling and genetic testing. Methods: In 2011ASCO began pilot testing new measures in QOPI to evaluate the practice of family history taking and referral for genetic counseling/testing in patients with either breast cancer (BC) or colorectal cancer (CRC). The measures assessed the presence or absence of CFH in 1st/2nd degree relatives, age at cancer diagnosis, referral for GC/GT and outcomes of referral. Results: Between September and October 2011 272 practices pilot tested these measures and reported on 10,466 patients (BC 6569, CRC 3897). 77.4% of all charts reviewed documented presence or absence of CFH in 1st degree relatives (BC 81.2% (CI 80-82%), CRC 77.4% (CI 76-79%), p= <0.001) and 61.5% of charts documented presence or absence of CFH in 2nd degree relatives (BC 68.9% (CI 68-70%), CRC 57.3% (CI 56-59%) p=<0.001). Age at diagnosis was documented for all relatives with cancer in 30.7% of charts (BC 45.2% (CI 44-47%), CRC 35.4% (CI 34-37%) p=<0.001). Patients were referred for GC/GT in 22.1% of all charts reviewed (BC 29.1% (CI 28-30%), CRC 19.6% (CI, 18-21%) p=<0.001). Of patients with hereditary risk (defined by selected risk guidelines) 52.2% of BC and 26.4% CRC were referred for GC/GT. When genetic testing was performed by the practice consent was documented 77.7% of the time and discussion of results was documented 78.8% of the time. Conclusions: Appropriate referral for GC/GT requires a complete and accurate CFH. In this pilot testing of QOPI measures we identified a higher quality of CFH information than expected though with room for improvement. Significant differences were seen between BC and CRC charts with greater accuracy of CFH and higher referral rates among BC patients. To obtain improvement in the identification and management of patients at high risk, significant improvements are needed. Education is part of the answer.

Association of BRCA-mutant pancreatic cancer with high tumor mutational burden (TMB) and higher PD-L1 expression.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4133-4133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Seeber ◽  
Alberto Puccini ◽  
Joanne Xiu ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Axel Grothey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Familial Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Mutational Burden ◽  
Tumor Mutational Burden ◽  
Brca2 Mutations

4133 Background: In the U.S. 56,000 Americans are expected to be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in 2019. Prognosis in pancreatic cancer is poor. Therefore, new treatment strategies are urgently needed to improve survival. BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations have been described to be the most common genetic mutations involved in familial pancreatic cancer. The optimal treatment regimen to use in BRCA-mutant pancreatic cancer has still to be established. Moreover, no data are available on association of BRCA mutation with immune-associated markerssuch as tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) or PD-L1 expression. Methods: Tumor samples of 2824 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were analyzed for BRCA mutation by NGS and for other genes (MiSeq on 47 genes, NextSeq on 592 genes) at Caris Life Sciences, Phoenix, AZ. TMB was calculated based on somatic nonsynonymous missense mutations, and MSI was evaluated by NGS of known MSI loci. PD-L1 expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. Results: In 4.4% (N = 124) of all pancreatic adenocarcinoma samples BRCA mutations were detected. BRCA2 mutations were more common: 3.1% (N = 89) vs 1.1% BRCA1 mutations (N = 35). BRCA mutations were associated with younger age ( BRCA1: 61 yrs for mutated vs. 64 for wild-type, p = 0.07; BRCA2: 61 yrs vs. 64, p = 0.002; both: p < 0.001). BRCA mutations were associated with higher MSI-H frequency (4.8% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002), elevated PD-L1 expression (22% vs. 11%, p < 0.001) and higher TMB (mean 8.7 mut/MB vs. 6.5, p < 0.001); the differences remain significant in MSS tumors (p < 0.05). BRCA-mutant pancreatic carcinomas showed a significantly lower mutation frequencies in TP53 (59% vs 73%, p = 0.001), CKDN2A (13% vs 25%, p = 0.006), but higher frequencies in APC (6.5% vs 2.2%), KMT2A (1.9% vs 0.2%), AMER1 (1.9 vs 0.5%) and SETD2 (3.7% vs 0.4%) mutations (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Conclusions: BRCA mutations are found in a significant subgroup of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and these carcinomas are associated with an immunogenic tumor profile. These data suggest evaluating PARP inhibitors in combination with immunotherapy in patients with BRCA-mutant pancreatic adenocarcinoma especially in tumors that are MSS.

Screening for Founder Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in Unselected Jewish Women

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 387-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Metcalfe ◽  
Aletta Poll ◽  
Robert Royer ◽  
Marcia Llacuachaqui ◽  
Anna Tulman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Saliva Sample ◽  
Jewish Women ◽  
Founder Mutations ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Family History Questionnaire ◽  
National Newspaper ◽  
Current Guidelines

Purpose There are two mutations in BRCA1 and one mutation in BRCA2 that are present in up to 2.5% of Ashkenazi Jewish women. Current guidelines for testing stipulate that a personal or family history of cancer be present to be eligible for testing. To date, population screening in this population has not been suggested. However, this may be rational. Little is known about the appropriateness of testing guidelines for the Jewish population or the level of interest in testing. Methods Eligible subjects were women who self-identified as Jewish, who were between the ages of 25 and 80 years, and who resided in Ontario. Subjects were recruited through an article in a national newspaper. Women were asked to complete a study questionnaire and a family history questionnaire and to provide a blood or saliva sample. The risk of carrying a BRCA mutation was estimated for each woman. Results A total of 2,080 women were enrolled onto the study. The overall mutation prevalence was 1.1% (0.5% for BRCA1 and 0.6% for BRCA2). Among the 22 mutation carriers, the mean estimate of carrying a BRCA mutation was 3.9%. Ten (45%) of the 22 women met the current Ontario Ministry of Health Guidelines criteria for testing. Conclusion There is considerable interest for genetic testing among Jewish women at low risk of carrying a mutation. However, many women with mutations are ineligible for genetic testing under current guidelines. Approximately 1% of Jewish women carry a BRCA mutation, and these women should be considered to be candidates for genetic testing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document