Overall survival in COMBI-d, a randomized, double-blinded, phase III study comparing the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib with dabrafenib and placebo as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600E/Kmutation-positive cutaneous melanoma.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georgina V. Long ◽  
Daniil Stroyakovskiy ◽  
Helen Gogas ◽  
Evgeny Levchenko ◽  
Filippo G. De Braud ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4077-4077
Author(s):  
Yan Sun ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Yabing Guo ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
...  

4077 Background: Many advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) patients (pts) are often with more complicated clinical conditions such as damaged liver or blood function, poor physical conditions. Those aHCC pts are not suitable for molecular target drug like sorafenib or systemic chemotherapy and no standard or generally accepted treatment. Icaritin, a single molecule ( > 98% purity) derived from Epimedii herba (Traditional Chinese herbal medicine), is a novel immune-modulation anti-tumor agent. Preclinical studies demonstrated that Icaritin induced anti-HCC activities through targeting IL-6/JAK//STAT3 pathways and modulating inflammation-immune systems including Th1 cytokines, and down-regulation of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Prior phase II study demonstrated favorable overall survival (OS) improvement in aHCC pts with poor conditions and correlated with the combined serum biomarkers. The current phase III study was designed to confirm above clinical benefits and safety of Icaritin in those patients. Methods: An adaptive enrichment design was used in a multicenter randomized, double-blinded study of comparing Icaritin with Huachashu (a TCM formula commonly used in China) as first line therapy for those aHCC pts (NCT03236636). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included time-to-progression (TTP), progression-free-survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The pts were randomized (1:1) to receive either Icaritin at 600mg or Huachashu. Based on prior studies, a composite biomarker score (CBS) of AFP(≥400 ng/mL), TNF-a( < 2.5 pg/mL) and IFN-g(≥7.0 pg/mL) was used for pts selection and a CBS score of 2/3 was predefined positive. Patients with CBS-positive were applied in interim analysis according to the protocol and statistical analysis plan (SAP). Results: A total of 283 aHCC pts were enrolled and randomized from Sept. 2017, and 71 enriched pts was CBS-positive with combined risk/poor prognosis factors such as BCLC stage C, HBV infection, and thrombocytopenia etc.. Thirty-three and 38 CBS-positive aHCC pts were treated with Icaritin or Huachashu, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8.1 mo (cutoff date, Dec.30,2020), the treatment outcomes for Icaritin and Huachashu arm showed following, that is mOS, 13.54 vs. 7.06 mo (HR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.21-0.77, p = 0.0046), mTTP, 3.65 vs. 1.84 mo (HR = 0.67, 95%CI, 0.36-1.22), mPFS, 2.79 vs. 1.84 mo (HR = 0.75, 95%CI, 0.43-1.33), and DCR, 48.5% vs. 26.3, respectively. Treatment-related adverse event (AE≥3 grades) observed were 15.2% vs. 31.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Small molecule immunomodulation agent Icaritin could significantly improve the overall survival with favorable safety in a prospectively CBS-enriched HBV-related advanced HCC pts with poor conditions. Clinical trial information: NCT03236636.


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1707-1715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Jassem ◽  
Tadeusz Pieńkowski ◽  
Anna Płuzańska ◽  
Svetislav Jelic ◽  
Vera Gorbunova ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: This phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) to 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 267 women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either AT (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 followed 24 hours later by paclitaxel 220 mg/m2) or FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2), each administered every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Patients had to have measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Only one prior non–anthracycline, nontaxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Overall response rates for patients randomized to AT and FAC were 68% and 55%, respectively (P = .032). Median time to progression and overall survival were significantly longer for AT compared with FAC (time to progression 8.3 months v 6.2 months [P = .034]; overall survival 23.3 months v 18.3 months [P = .013]). Therapy was generally well-tolerated (median of eight cycles delivered in each arm). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with AT than with FAC (89% v 65%; P < .001); however, the incidence of fever and infection was low. Grade 3 or 4 arthralgia and myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, and diarrhea were more common with AT, whereas nausea and vomiting were more common with FAC. The incidence of cardiotoxicity was low in both arms. CONCLUSION: AT conferred a significant advantage in response rate, time to progression, and overall survival compared with FAC. Treatment was well-tolerated with no unexpected toxicities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document