3301 Two year estimate of overall survival in COMBI-v, a randomized, open-label, phase III study comparing the combination of dabrafenib (D) and trametinib (T) with vemurafenib (Vem) as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive cutaneous melanoma

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 ◽  
pp. S663 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Robert ◽  
B. Karaszewska ◽  
J. Schachter ◽  
P. Rutkowski ◽  
A. Mackiewicz ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1519-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Schilsky ◽  
Jeremey Levin ◽  
William H. West ◽  
Alfred Wong ◽  
Bruce Colwell ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study (FUMA3008) conducted in the United States and Canada compared the safety and efficacy of EU/5-FU (11.5 mg/m2/1.15 mg/m2 twice daily for 28 days every 35 days) with that of intravenous 5-FU/LV (425 mg/m2/20 mg/m2 once daily for 5 days every 28 days) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 981 patients were randomized and 964 patients received treatment (485 EU/5FU, 479 5FU/LV). Survival for EU/5-FU was not statistically equivalent (but not statistically inferior) to that for 5-FU/LV (hazard ratio, 0.880; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.03). Median duration of survival was 13.3 months in the EU/5-FU group and 14.5 months in the 5-FU/LV group. Median duration of progression-free survival for EU/5-FU was statistically inferior to that of the control group (20.0 weeks [95% CI, 19.1 to 20.9 weeks] v 22.7 weeks [95% CI, 18.3 to 24.6 weeks]; P = .01). Both treatments were well tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity in both groups; treatment-related grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 19% of patients treated with EU/5-FU and 16% of patients receiving 5-FU/LV (P = .354). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 5% of EU/5-FU patients and 47% of 5-FU/LV patients. CONCLUSION: Safety profiles of both treatments were acceptable. Although antitumor activity was observed, EU/5-FU did not meet the protocol-specified statistical criteria for equivalence to 5-FU/LV in terms of OS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4077-4077
Author(s):  
Yan Sun ◽  
Shukui Qin ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Yabing Guo ◽  
Ying Zhang ◽  
...  

4077 Background: Many advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) patients (pts) are often with more complicated clinical conditions such as damaged liver or blood function, poor physical conditions. Those aHCC pts are not suitable for molecular target drug like sorafenib or systemic chemotherapy and no standard or generally accepted treatment. Icaritin, a single molecule ( > 98% purity) derived from Epimedii herba (Traditional Chinese herbal medicine), is a novel immune-modulation anti-tumor agent. Preclinical studies demonstrated that Icaritin induced anti-HCC activities through targeting IL-6/JAK//STAT3 pathways and modulating inflammation-immune systems including Th1 cytokines, and down-regulation of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Prior phase II study demonstrated favorable overall survival (OS) improvement in aHCC pts with poor conditions and correlated with the combined serum biomarkers. The current phase III study was designed to confirm above clinical benefits and safety of Icaritin in those patients. Methods: An adaptive enrichment design was used in a multicenter randomized, double-blinded study of comparing Icaritin with Huachashu (a TCM formula commonly used in China) as first line therapy for those aHCC pts (NCT03236636). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints included time-to-progression (TTP), progression-free-survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and safety. The pts were randomized (1:1) to receive either Icaritin at 600mg or Huachashu. Based on prior studies, a composite biomarker score (CBS) of AFP(≥400 ng/mL), TNF-a( < 2.5 pg/mL) and IFN-g(≥7.0 pg/mL) was used for pts selection and a CBS score of 2/3 was predefined positive. Patients with CBS-positive were applied in interim analysis according to the protocol and statistical analysis plan (SAP). Results: A total of 283 aHCC pts were enrolled and randomized from Sept. 2017, and 71 enriched pts was CBS-positive with combined risk/poor prognosis factors such as BCLC stage C, HBV infection, and thrombocytopenia etc.. Thirty-three and 38 CBS-positive aHCC pts were treated with Icaritin or Huachashu, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8.1 mo (cutoff date, Dec.30,2020), the treatment outcomes for Icaritin and Huachashu arm showed following, that is mOS, 13.54 vs. 7.06 mo (HR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.21-0.77, p = 0.0046), mTTP, 3.65 vs. 1.84 mo (HR = 0.67, 95%CI, 0.36-1.22), mPFS, 2.79 vs. 1.84 mo (HR = 0.75, 95%CI, 0.43-1.33), and DCR, 48.5% vs. 26.3, respectively. Treatment-related adverse event (AE≥3 grades) observed were 15.2% vs. 31.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Small molecule immunomodulation agent Icaritin could significantly improve the overall survival with favorable safety in a prospectively CBS-enriched HBV-related advanced HCC pts with poor conditions. Clinical trial information: NCT03236636.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 543-543 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Elizabeth R. Plimack ◽  
Viktor Stus ◽  
Rustem Airatovich Gafanov ◽  
Robert E. Hawkins ◽  
...  

543 Background: A phase 1b study of pembro (anti–PD-1) plus axi (VEGFR-TKI) showed promising antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients (pts) with previously untreated mRCC. The global, open-label, phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 study assessed the efficacy and safety of pembro + axi vs sunitinib as first-line therapy for mRCC (NCT02853331). Methods: Eligible pts with clear-cell mRCC, no previous systemic therapy for mRCC, and KPS ≥70% were randomized 1:1 to pembro 200 mg IV Q3W for a maximum of 35 cycles plus axi 5 mg orally BID or sunitinib 50 mg orally QD (4-wk on/2-wk off schedule). Treatment was given until PD, intolerable toxicity, or pt/investigator decision. Randomization was stratified by IMDC risk group and geographic region. Primary endpoints were OS and PFS (RECIST v1.1 by blinded, independent central review [BICR]). ORR was the key secondary endpoint. At the protocol-specified first interim analysis, the superiority thresholds were P = 0.0001 for OS, 0.0013 for PFS, and 0.025 for ORR (if OS and PFS were significant). Results: 861 pts were randomized: 432 to pembro + axi, 429 to sunitinib. After a 12.8-mo median follow-up, 59.0% of pts in the pembro + axi arm and 43.1% in the sunitinib arm remained on treatment. Pembro + axi significantly improved OS (HR 0.53 [95% CI 0.38-0.74]; P < 0.0001; 12-mo rate 89.9% vs 78.3%), PFS (HR 0.69 [95% CI 0.57-0.84]; P = 0.0001; median 15.1 vs 11.1 mo), and ORR (59.3% vs 35.7%; P < 0.0001). Duration of response was prolonged with pembro + axi (median not reached vs 15.2 mo). The pembro + axi benefit was observed in all subgroups tested, including all IMDC risk and PD-L1 expression subgroups. Treatment-related AEs were grade 3-5 in 62.9% of pts in the pembro + axi arm vs 58.1% in the sunitinib arm and led to regimen discontinuation in 6.3% vs 10.1%. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab + axitinib provided superior OS, PFS, and ORR compared with sunitinib and had manageable safety in pts with previously untreated, advanced or metastatic clear-cell RCC. These data suggest that pembrolizumab + axitinib should be a new standard of care for this population. Clinical trial information: NCT02853331.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document