Nurse navigation: The key to a seamless transition.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
Joy M. Fulbright ◽  
Wendy McClellan ◽  
Gary C. Doolittle ◽  
Hope Krebill ◽  
Robin Ryan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Childhood Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Childhood Cancer Survivors ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Nurse Navigator ◽  
Seamless Transition

84 Background: Children's Mercy (CM) established a cancer survivorship clinic that cares for approximately 180 survivors a year. A third of the survivors are 18 years or older requiring transition to adult care. The importance of transitioning childhood cancer survivors from pediatric oncology care to adult primary care has been acknowledged in literature, but obstacles remain. Barriers include patient and provider anxiety, difficulty navigating the complex health care system and lack of knowledge regarding late effects. CM and The University of Kansas Cancer Center (KUCC) collaborated to decrease barriers to transition for childhood cancer survivors. Methods: The work group met for 2 years to develop the clinic at KUCC. Models and delivery of survivorship care, including the breast cancer survivorship clinic at KUCC, were reviewed. A shared nurse navigator was identified as an essential component to a seamless transition. Philanthropic support was obtained and job description was developed. Contracts were negotiated to allow the navigator to be present at both institutions. Results: The Survivorship Transition Clinic (STC) at KUCC launched July 2014, with a navigator supporting patients at CM as they begin their transition. The same navigator then meets with the patient at KUCC STC as they initiate care. The navigator provides treatment summaries, patient education and navigates the referral services for survivors. Since clinic launch, 16 survivors out of 16 have successfully transitioned from pediatric to adult survivorship care. Positive feedback was received from patient satisfaction surveys that were administered. A common theme showed a relief from anxiety due to having a contact person to facilitate communication among providers in a complex healthcare system. Conclusions: The nurse navigator has minimized anxiety about transition for patients and parents as she establishes a relationship with patients at CM, and then is able to provide continuity as they transition to the STC at KUMC. The navigator also improves communication between pediatric providers, adult primary care providers and sub-specialists caring for the patients. Overall, our transition process has been effective and is now serving as a model across both institutions.

Physician preferences and attitudes regarding different models of cancer survivorship care: a comparison of primary care providers and oncologists

2013 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Noreen Aziz ◽  
Anne-Michelle Noone ◽  
Julia H. Rowland ◽  
Arnold L. Potosky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers

Cancer survivorship algorithms as clinical tools for primary care providers.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 100-100
Author(s):  
Guadalupe R. Palos ◽  
Katherine Ramsey Gilmore ◽  
Paula A. Lewis-Patterson ◽  
Maria Alma Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Coordinated Care ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
The Impact

100 Background: Clinical decision tools (CDTs) such as survivorship algorithms may be valuable resources for primary care providers who provide post-treatment care for cancer survivors. Our objective was to assess providers’ perceptions, adoption, and satisfaction with clinical practice algorithms tailored to site-specific cancer survivorship clinics. Methods: Eligible providers were those assigned to one of 9 site-specific survivorship clinics, (breast, colorectal, genitourinary, gynecology, head and neck, lymphoma, melanoma, stem cell transplant, and thyroid). Potential respondents were invited to participate by emails. Voluntary return of the survey indicated a provider’s informed consent. Providers had the choice to participate by clicking on a link embedded in an email. Once the link was activated, the user was taken to a 10-item survey with questions asking about the usability, awareness, and satisfaction with the algorithms specific to their clinic. Descriptive statistics (i.e. frequencies and percentages) were used to summarize the responses. Results: Of 35 providers assigned in the survivorship clinics, 18 responded resulting in a 51% response rate. The majority of respondents (94.4%) were aware of the survivorship algorithms specific to their clinic. Over 75% reported using the algorithms occasionally (16.7%), frequently (33%) and always (33.3%). The major barrier to using the algorithms was a lack of awareness on to access the algorithms. Over half of the providers (55.6%) preferred using the digital versions of the algorithms. 68% strongly agreed the algorithms were practical to use and implement in their clinical setting. The majority of providers’ reported being satisfied (62.5%) or very satisfied (25.0%) with the algorithms tailored to their site specific clinic. Conclusions: Survivorship practice algorithms were perceived as useful clinical resources to deliver coordinated care to cancer survivors with diverse cancer diagnoses. Future work is needed to determine the impact of the algorithms on providers’ practice with cancer survivors.

scholarly journals Primary Care Providers' Needs and Preferences for Information about Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 635-651 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Salz ◽  
K. C. Oeffinger ◽  
P. R. Lewis ◽  
R. L. Williams ◽  
R. L. Rhyne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers

scholarly journals Risk-Stratified Pathways for Cancer Survivorship Care: Insights from a Deliberative Multi-Stakeholder Consultation

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 3408-3419
Author(s):  
Dominique Tremblay ◽  
Nassera Touati ◽  
Karine Bilodeau ◽  
Catherine Prady ◽  
Susan Usher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Stakeholder Consultation ◽  
Cancer Specialists ◽  
Multi Stakeholder

Risk-stratified pathways of survivorship care seek to optimize coordination between cancer specialists and primary care physicians based on the whole person needs of the individual. While the principle is supported by leading cancer institutions, translating knowledge to practice confronts a lack of clarity about the meaning of risk stratification, uncertainties around the expectations the model holds for different actors, and health system structures that impede communication and coordination across the care continuum. These barriers must be better understood and addressed to pave the way for future implementation. Recognizing that an innovation is more likely to be adopted when user experience is incorporated into the planning process, a deliberative consultation was held as a preliminary step to developing a pilot project of risk-stratified pathways for patients transitioning from specialized oncology teams to primary care providers. This article presents findings from the deliberative consultation that sought to understand the perspectives of cancer specialists, primary care physicians, oncology nurses, allied professionals, cancer survivors and researchers regarding the following questions: what does a risk stratified model of cancer survivorship care mean to care providers and users? What are the prerequisites for translating risk stratification into practice? What challenges are involved in establishing these prerequisites? The multi-stakeholder consultation provides empirical data to guide actions that support the development of risk-stratified pathways to coordinate survivorship care.

scholarly journals Overview of Cancer Survivorship Care for Primary Care Providers

Cureus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukesh Manthri ◽  
Stephen A Geraci ◽  
Kanishka Chakraborty
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers

scholarly journals Primary Care Providers’ Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs, and Practices Regarding Their Preparedness to Provide Cancer Survivorship Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 1219-1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Geramita ◽  
Ira R. Parker ◽  
Jill W. Brufsky ◽  
Brenda Diergaarde ◽  
G. J. van Londen
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Beliefs And Practices

scholarly journals Primary Care Provider Involvement in Thyroid Cancer Survivorship Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. e3300-e3306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archana Radhakrishnan ◽  
David Reyes-Gastelum ◽  
Brittany Gay ◽  
Sarah T Hawley ◽  
Ann S Hamilton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
High Confidence ◽  
Neck Ultrasound

Abstract Context While prior research has examined how primary care providers (PCPs) can care for breast and colon cancer survivors, little is known about their role in thyroid cancer survivorship. Objective To understand PCP involvement and confidence in thyroid cancer survivorship care. Design/Setting/Participants We surveyed PCPs identified by thyroid cancer patients from the Georgia and LA SEER registries (n = 162, response rate 56%). PCPs reported their involvement in long-term surveillance and confidence in handling survivorship care (role of random thyroglobulin levels and neck ultrasound, and when to end long-term surveillance and refer back to the specialist). We examined: 1) PCP-reported factors associated with involvement using multivariable analyses; and 2) bivariate associations between involvement and confidence in handling survivorship care. Main Outcome Measures PCP involvement (involved vs not involved) and confidence (high vs low). Results Many PCPs (76%) reported being involved in long-term surveillance. Involvement was greater among PCPs who noted clinical guidelines as the most influential source in guiding treatment (OR 4.29; 95% CI, 1.56-11.82). PCPs reporting high confidence in handling survivorship varied by aspects of care: refer patient to specialist (39%), role of neck ultrasound (36%) and random thyroglobulin levels (27%), and end long-term surveillance (14%). PCPs reporting involvement were more likely to report high confidence in discussing the role of random thyroglobulin levels (33.3% vs 7.9% not involved; P < 0.01). Conclusions While PCPs reported being involved in long-term surveillance, gaps remain in their confidence in handling survivorship care. Thyroid cancer survivorship guidelines that delineate PCP roles present one opportunity to increase confidence about their participation.

Cancer Survivorship Care: How Primary Care Providers Perceive Their Role.

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Robinson ◽  
K. Rychlik ◽  
P. Mumby ◽  
S. Lo ◽  
K. Albain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Survivorship ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Survivorship Care ◽  
Care Providers
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document