Baseline creatinine clearance as an indicator of severe adverse events associated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer: Safety analysis of the phase III Japanese ACHIEVE trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 667-667
Author(s):  
Masato Nakamura ◽  
Masahito Kotaka ◽  
Tetsuya Eto ◽  
Dai Manaka ◽  
Junichi Hasegawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Creatinine Clearance ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Baseline Creatinine ◽  
Grade 3

667 Background: The phase III ACHIEVE trial (JFMC47), a project of the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA), was established to prospectively analyze data from several randomized trials to test whether 3-month (arm 3) oxaliplatin-based adjuvant (FOLFOX4, mFOLFOX6, or XELOX) treatment is non-inferior to 6-month (arm 6) treatment in terms of disease-free survival in patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer. It aims to reveal the association between baseline characteristics and ≥ grade 3 adverse events (AEs) related to XELOX and mFOLFOX6, particularly focusing on the role of baseline creatinine clearance (CCr) on ≥ grade 3 AEs. Methods: This association was assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: During 2012–2014, 1,313 pts were randomized from 244 centers; 1,301 were included in the intention-to-treat population. Among the safety population (N = 1,277; 642, arm 3; 635, arm 6), the overall incidence of ≥ grade 3 AEs was 29% in arm 3 and 43% in arm 6 (p < 0.0001). Neuropathy of ≥ grade 2 was more frequent in arm 6 than in arm 3 (37% vs. 14%; p < 0.0001). Regarding the fluoropyrimidine backbone, grade 3–4 neutropenia was more with mFOLFOX6 than XELOX (30% vs. 12%), whereas grade 3–4 anorexia (2% vs. 5%) and grade 3–4 diarrhea (1% vs. 6%) were more with XELOX. Multivariate analysis, including treatment duration, regimen, CCr ( < 50 vs. > 50 mL/min), age, and sex, showed that CCr had a statistically significant impact on the occurrence of ≥ grade 3 AEs (hazard ratio = 0.44, p < 0.0001). Pts with CCr < 50 may have had more frequent ≥ grade 3 AEs independent of other factors, such as age. Conclusions: Grade 3 or higher AEs related to XELOX or mFOLFOX6 may be associated with the degree of CCr. Clinical trial information: UMIN 000008543.

Clinical efficacy and safety of early adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer: Short-term outcomes of a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3598-3598
Author(s):  
Jun Seok Park ◽  
Soo Yeun Park ◽  
Gyu-Seog Choi ◽  
Hye Jin Kim ◽  
Jong Gwang Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Surgical Complication ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

3598 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is recommended to commence within 8 weeks since after surgical resection of stage II or III colon cancer. Results of many retrospective studies showed inferior survival outcomes following delay of AC delay. Moreover, preclinical studies showed that the progression of disseminated cancer cells is profound during the postoperative period. This study is the first prospective trial to evaluate early (≤ 14 days postoperative) AC for patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer. Methods: This study is a prospective, multicenter, randomized phase III trial. Pts with pathological stage III colon cancer were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to early AC (starting AC ≤ 14 days after surgery) or conventional AC (starting AC > 14 days after surgery). Pts were recommended to receive 12 cycles of FOLFOX-6 for AC. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. The secondary endpoints were overall survival, adverse events, surgical complication during AC, and patient-reported outcomes (quality of life) during 1 year after surgery. Herein, safety data, chemotherapy delivery, and quality of life are presented. Results: This study randomized 443 pts either early AC arm (221pts) or early AC arm (222 pts) to the during September 2011 to March 2020. 380 pts who received at least one cycle of FOLFOX-6 were included in the safety analysis (192 and 188 in the early and conventional AC arms, respectively). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were well-balanced except for the interval from the surgery to the initial AC. The early and conventional AC arms started their first chemotherapy at median of 13 (4-43 days) and 29 (17-53 days) after surgery (p < 0.001), respectively. No significant differences were seen in the median chemotherapy cycles, AC completion, and relative oxaliplatin dose intensity between groups. AC Completion without any change of dose or schedule delay was seen in 18% and 20% in early and conventional AC arms respectively, while dose reduction or delay was 65% and 61%, respectively. Toxicities of grade 3 or more were seen in 28% in both groups. One patient in the early AC arm underwent an emergent operation for anastomotic leakage on the second day of 5-fluorouracil infusion (postoperative day 14). However, the surgical complication was not seen in any other patient. The scores of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life core 30 questionnaire were similar in both arms at baseline (before starting AC), and 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery. Conclusions: Early AC was safe and did not increase either chemotherapy-related adverse events or surgery-related complications during treatment. Moreover early AC did not reduce the quality of life of the pts during 1 year after surgery. This study continues to follow-up the patients for survival outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT01460589.

Three Versus 6 Months of Oxaliplatin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: Disease-Free Survival Results From a Randomized, Open-Label, International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant (IDEA) France, Phase III Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15) ◽  
pp. 1469-1477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry André ◽  
Dewi Vernerey ◽  
Laurent Mineur ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
Jérôme Desrame ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose Reduction of adjuvant treatment duration may decrease toxicities without loss of efficacy in stage III colon cancer. This could offer clear advantages to patients and health care providers. Methods In International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) France, as part of the IDEA international collaboration, patient with colon cancer patients were randomly assigned to 3 and 6 months of modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6: infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) by physician choice. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), and analyses were descriptive. Results A total of 2,010 eligible patients received either 3 or 6 months of chemotherapy (modified intention-to-treat population); 2,000 (99%) had stage III colon cancer (N1: 75%, N2: 25%); 1,809 (90%) received mFOLFOX6, and 201 (10%) received CAPOX. The median age was 64 years, and the median follow-up time was 4.3 years. Overall, 94% (3 months) and 78% (6 months) of patients completed treatment (fluoropyrimidines ± oxaliplatin). Maximal grade 2 and 3 neuropathy rates were 28% and 8% in the 3-month arm and 41% and 25% in the 6-month arm ( P < .001). Final rates of residual neuropathy greater than grade 1 were 3% in the 3-month arm and 7% in the 6-month arm ( P < .001). There were 578 DFS events: 314 and 264 in the 3- and 6-month arms, respectively. The 3-year DFS rates were 72% and 76% in the 3- and 6-month arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.46; P = .0112). In the 3 and 6-month arms, respectively, for patients who received mFOLFOX6, the 3-year DFS rates were 72% and 76% (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.51); for the T4 and/or N2 population, they were 58% and 66% (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.82); and for the T1-3N1 population, they were 81% and 83% (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.49). Conclusion IDEA France, in which 90% of patients received mFOLFOX6, shows superiority of 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 3 months, especially in the T4 and/or N2 subgroups. These results should be considered alongside the international IDEA collaboration data.

Six months versus twelve months of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III (Dukes' C) colon cancer: Initial safety report for the open-label randomized phase III study (JFMC37-0801).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3607-3607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyuki Kunieda ◽  
Sotaro Sadahiro ◽  
Hideyuki Mishima ◽  
Chikuma Hamada ◽  
Shigetoyo Saji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

3607 Background: The standard treatment duration of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer is 6 months. On the other hand, no clinical trial showed the optimal treatment duration of oral chemotherapeutic agents in adjuvant setting for colon cancer. Sargent et al have reported that 83% of recurrences in stage II and III pts have occurred within the first 3 years after surgery and peak was observed around one year after surgery. Therefore, to clarify the benefit of 12 months administration of Capecitabine, we designed randomized phase III trial for a comparison of 6 months treatment and 12 months treatment of capecitabine as adjuvant CT for stage III colon cancer. Methods: JFMC37 is a multicenter, randomized Phase III trial. Patients with fully resected Stage III colon or recto sigmoid cancer were eligible. Capecitabine was administered orally as tablets, 2,500 mg/m²/day for 14 days followed by a 7-days rest. Treatment is continued to 8 cycles (6 months) in arm A (A) or 16 cycles (12 months) in arm B (B). Patients were randomized 1:1 to A or B. Data size was estimated by disease free survival as primary endpoint. The statistical design is based on superiority hypothesis; 5-yrs DFS is 60% in arm A, 67% in arm B ;unilateral α=0.05, 1-β=0.8;and planed accrual is 1200 pts. Results: Between September 2008 to December 2009, 1304 patients were enrolled and then randomized. Both arms were well balanced for mean age: (A) 64.1, (B) 63.8; ECOG PS (%0/1): (A) 95.0/5.0, (B) 97.1/2.9; involvement of lymph nodes (%N0/N1/N2): (A) 77.1/19.9/3.1, (B) 76.6/19.7/3.7. Treatment completion rate for A and B were 68.2% and 43.4%. Incidences of serious adverse events (SAEs) over 1% were neutropenia: (A) 2.6%, (B) 3.8%, diarrhea: (A) 2.9%, (B) 2.1%, loss of appetite: (A) 1.3%, (B) 1.0%, fatigue: (A) 1.8%, (B) 1.2%, hand-hoot syndrome: (A) 16.4%, (B) 22.1%. Conclusions: There were no obvious differences in SAEs between arm A and arm B. Although twelve months of capecitabine showed a tendency to increase G3/4 hand-foot syndrome, we concluded that incidence of SAEs were acceptable and comparable to previously report.

A randomized phase III trial of S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) versus UFT/leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage III colon cancer: The ACTS-CC 02 trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 484-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takao Takahashi ◽  
Eiji Sunami ◽  
Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽  
Mitsuyoshi Ota ◽  
Yoshiyuki Sakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Stage Iiic ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

484 Background: The ACTS-CC 02 trial was designed to verify the superiority of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) over UFT/leucovorin (LV), one of the standard oral fluoropyrimidine regimens in Japan, in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) in patients (pts) with high-risk stage III colon cancer (any T, N2, or positive nodes around the origin of the feeding arteries). The results of the safety analysis have been reported previously (Clin Colorectal Cancer, 2018). We now present the 3-year DFS results as the primary endpoint. Methods: Pts who underwent curative resection for pathologically confirmed high-risk stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive either UFT/LV (300–600 mg/day of UFT according to body surface area [BSA] and 75 mg/day of LV on days 1-28, every 35 days, 5 courses) or SOX (100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 and 80–120 mg/day of S-1 according to BSA on days 1-14, every 21 days, 8 courses). The primary endpoint was DFS. Results: From April 2010 through October 2014, a total of 966 pts were enrolled at 260 institutions. The full analysis set, excluding pts who withdrew informed consent before protocol treatment, comprised 478 and 477 pts in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, respectively. The median age was 65.0 years. The ECOG PS was 0 in 94.0%, and the disease stage was IIIA/IIIB/IIIC in 1.3%/50.2%/48.6%. The 3-year DFS rate was 60.6% in the UFT/LV group and 62.7% in the SOX group (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.74-1.09; p = 0.28); the superiority of SOX was not demonstrated. In stage IIIB, the 3-year DFS rate was 69.3% and 68.5% in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, respectively (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.74-1.37; p = 0.95). In Stage IIIC, the 3-year DFS rate was 50.6% and 55.8% in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, respectively (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.63-1.06; p = 0.12). Notably, in the N2b subgroup, the 3-year DFS rate was 46.0% and 54.7% in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, respectively (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.55-1.05; p = 0.10). Conclusions: SOX was not shown to be superior to UFT/LV in pts with high-risk stage III colon cancer. However, the oxaliplatin-based regimen was suggested to be more effective in advanced disease, such as stage IIIC and N2b. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-101073.

The prospective French participitation to IDEA (International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy) study in stage III colon cancer: Patients’ characteristics and safety analysis of 3 versus 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 633-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry Andre ◽  
Aimery De Gramont ◽  
Laurent Mineur ◽  
Jérôme Desramé ◽  
Roger Faroux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

633 Background: The IDEA international collaboration was established to prospectively combine/analyze data from six randomized trials to assess whether a 3-month course of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidines-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is non-inferior to the 6-month current standard treatment in stage III colon cancer (CC). The primary endpoint of IDEA was 3-year disease-free survival. The accrual goal for the French IDEA study was 2,000 patients. Methods: French IDEA randomized patients with stage III CC between 3 months (arm A) and 6 months (arm B) of adjuvant CT with modified (m) FOLFOX6 or XELOX (depending on physician/patient choice). Oxaliplatin was stopped in case of persistent neuropathy grade ≥2 with fluoropyrimidines continuation for the planned duration. Toxicity was graded during treatment and follow-up using NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Results: From May 2009 to May 2014, 2,023 patients were randomized in 129 French centers either to arm A (n=1009, 49.9%) or to arm B (n=1014, 50.1%). 2012 (99.5%) patients had stage III disease (N1: 75%; N2: 25%) and 11 patients had stage II (n=2) or stage IV disease (n=9). Median age was 64 years (18-85). 89.4% of patients received mFOLFOX6, 10.1% of patients received XELOX, and 0.5% of patients did not receive any study treatment. Overall, 94.1% and 77.5% of patients completed 3 months (arm A) and 6 months (arm B) of CT, respectively. Median oxaliplatin dose was 500 mg/m2 in arm A and 747 mg/m2in arm B. Toxicity profiles depended on the FU backbone with more grade 3/4 neutropenia on mFOLFOX6 (15.0% vs 6.5%) and more grade 3/4 diarrhea (4.7% vs 8.1%) on XELOX. Grade 2/3-4 peripheral neuropathy was less common in arm A than in arm B (23.2/6% vs 37.9/20.4%). Grade 2/3-4 residual neuropathy for patients with a follow-up of at least 3 years (n=811, median follow-up of 3.91 years) was 2.3/0.5% in arm A vs 3.9/ 2.4% in arm B. At 6 months after randomization, mortality rate was 0.7% (n=7) on arm A and 0.5% (n=5) on arm B. Median follow-up is 2.74 years for the whole population. Conclusions: Both mFOLFOX6 and XELOX were safe. Peripheral neuropathy was lower in arm A than in arm B. Clinical trial information: 2009-010384-16.

The Greek participitation to IDEA (International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy) study of 3 versus 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer: Patients’ characteristics and safety analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 740-740
Author(s):  
John Souglakos ◽  
Ioannis Boukovinas ◽  
Stylianos Kakolyris ◽  
Nikolaos Ziras ◽  
Nikolaos E. M. Androulakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Patient Choice ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
N2 Disease ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Chemotherapy Study

740 Background: The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant (IDEA) collaboration was established to prospectively analyze data from six randomized trials to assess whether a 3-month course of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidines (FU)-based adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) is non-inferior to the 6-month current standard treatment in stage III colon cancer (CC). The primary endpoint of IDEA was 3-year disease-free survival. The accrual goal for the Greek IDEA study was 1.000 patients. Methods: Greek IDEA randomized patients with stage III colon cancer between 3 months (arm A) and 6 months (arm B) of adjuvant CT with modified (m) FOLFOX6 or XELOX (depending on physician/patient choice). Toxicity was graded during treatment and follow-up using NCI-CTCAE v3.0. Results: From May 2009 to October 2015, 708 patients were randomized in Greek centers either to arm A (n = 354, 50%) or to arm B (n = 354, 50.%). 297 (41.9%) patients received mFOLFOX6 and 411 (58.%) XELOX. The median age was 67 years (20-75) and 579 (81.8%) of them had PS 0. The patients’ population was balanced for the major risk factor between the two arms: N1/N2 disease (68.1/31.9% vs. 68.9/31.1 for ARM A and B, respectively), obstruction (4.5% vs. 2.5 for ARM A and B, respectively) and perforation (5.1% vs. 6.2 for ARM A and B, respectively). Overall, 96.9% and 89.5% of patients completed 3 months (arm A) and 6 months (arm B) of CT, respectively. Median oxaliplatin dose was 505 mg/m2 in arm A and 738 mg/m2 in arm B. Toxicity profiles were comparable between the two arm and the two fluoropyrimidines backbones with a total incidence of Grade 3/4 adverse events 18.9/4.4% and 19.7/5.1% for mFOLFOX6 and XELOX, respectively. Grade 2/3-4 peripheral neuropathy during the study was similar between arm A (33.9/4%) and B (38.7/3.7%). Conclusions: Both mFOLFOX6 and XELOX were safe. More patients completed the scheduled treatment in the 3-arm schedule.

scholarly journals Updated 5-year survival and exploratory T x N subset analyses of ACTS-CC trial: a randomised controlled trial of S-1 versus tegafur-uracil/leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer

ESMO Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. e000428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽  
Megumi Ishiguro ◽  
Eiji Nakatani ◽  
Motoki Yoshida ◽  
Tsukasa Inoue ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

ObjectiveAdjuvant Chemotherapy Trial of TS-1 for Colon Cancer (ACTS-CC), a randomised phase III trial, demonstrated that adjuvant therapy with S-1 for stage III colon cancer was non-inferior in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) to that of tegafur-uracil plus leucovorin (UFT/LV). We updated DFS and overall survival (OS) and performed T x N subset analysisMethodsA total of 1518 patients with curatively resected stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive S-1 (80–120  mg/day on days 1–28 every 42 days, four courses) or UFT/LV (UFT: 300–600  mg/day and LV: 75  mg/day on days 1–28 every 35 days, five courses)ResultsThe 5-year DFS rates of the S-1 and UFT/LV group were 70.2 % and 66.9 %, respectively (HR 0.88; 95%  CI 0.74 to 1.06; p=0.177), and non-inferiority of DFS was reconfirmed with a median of 63.5-month follow-up. The similarity of OS was also confirmed (HR 0.92; 95%  CI 0.72 to 1.17; p=0.488); 5-year OS rates of the S-1 and UFT/LV group were 86.0 % and 84.4 %, respectively. No significant interactions were identified between the major baseline characteristics and DFS of the S-1 and UFT/LV groups, except for histological type; S-1 was more favourable in patients with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Patient outcomes were well separated by TNM-substages (IIIA/IIIB/IIIC). With the patients divided into 20 subsets by T and N factors, the DFS and OS rates of T3 and N1 subset, which accounted for 62 % of stage IIIB patients and 44 % of all studied subjects, were significantly better than those of the other subsets in stage IIIB and similar to those of stage IIIA.ConclusionsAdjuvant therapy of S-1 for stage III colon cancer was reconfirmed to be non-inferior in DFS to those of UFT/LV after long follow-up. No difference in OS was also demonstrated. T3N1 patients might be considered separately from other patients included in stage IIIB because of its favourable outcome.Trial registration numberNCT00660894.

scholarly journals Safety data from the phase III Japanese ACHIEVE trial: part of an international, prospective, planned pooled analysis of six phase III trials comparing 3 versus 6 months of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer

ESMO Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. e000354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masahito Kotaka ◽  
Takeharu Yamanaka ◽  
Takayuki Yoshino ◽  
Dai Manaka ◽  
Tetsuya Eto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundThe International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant chemotherapy project investigated whether a shorter duration of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was as effective as 6 months of identical chemotherapy for resected stage III colon cancer. As part of this project, we report safety data from the Japanese ACHIEVE study (JFMC47-1202-C3).Patients and methodsACHIEVE was an open-label, multicentre trial randomising patients with stage III colon cancer to receive 3 m or 6 m of mFOLFOX6/CAPOX after surgery. Choice of regimen was declared before randomisation by a site investigator.ResultsBetween August 2012 and June 2014, 1313 patients were enrolled and, of those, 1277 were analysed for the safety analysis, with 635 in arm 6 (mFOLFOX6, n=158; CAPOX, n=477) and 642 in arm 3 (mFOLFOX6, n=161; CAPOX, n=481). Grade 3 or worse peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN) developed in 5%/0.6% of patients receiving mFOLFOX6 in arm 6/3 (p=0.019) and 6%/1% of those receiving CAPOX in arm 6/3 (p<0.001). Similarly, grade 2 or worse PSN developed in 36%/11% of patients receiving mFOLFOX6 in arm 6/3 (p<0.001) and 37%/14% of those receiving CAPOX in arm 6/3 (p<0.001). An association between baseline creatinine clearance (CCr) and adverse events (AEs) was found that patients with CAPOX were significantly more likely to develop AEs ≥grade 3 when they had a CCr ≤50 (OR 1.67; p=0.048).ConclusionsWe confirmed in the Japanese population that the shorter duration of adjuvant chemotherapy resulted in a significant reduction of PSN. In patients with CAPOX, renal function was significantly related to severe AEs.Trial registration numberUMIN000008543, Results.

Final results of the ACTS-CC 02 trial: A randomized phase III trial of S-1/oxaliplatin (SOX) versus UFT/leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage III colon cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 59-59
Author(s):  
Naohiro Tomita ◽  
Shin Sasaki ◽  
Tetsuya Kusumoto ◽  
Jun Watanabe ◽  
Yoshiyuki Sakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Japanese Patients ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer

59 Background: As previously reported (Sunami E, et al. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2020), the ACTS-CC 02 trial demonstrated that S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) was not superior to UFT/leucovorin (LV) in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage III colon cancer (any T, N2, or positive nodes around the origin of the feeding arteries). We now report the final overall survival (OS) after a median follow-up of more than 6 years. Methods: A total of 966 patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer were randomly assigned to receive either UFT/LV (300–600 mg/day of UFT according to body surface area [BSA] and 75 mg/day of LV on days 1-28, every 35 days, 5 courses) or SOX (100 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin on day 1 and 80–120 mg/day of S-1 according to BSA on days 1-14, every 21 days, 8 courses). The primary endpoint was DFS. Patients’ data were updated in February 2020. Results: The subjects of this final efficacy analysis were 955 patients (478 in the UFT/LV group and 477 in the SOX group). Totally, Stage IIIA/IIIB/IIIC were 1.3%/50.2%/48.6% and T1/2/3/4 were 1.5%/4.0%/61.8%/32.7%. With median follow-up time of 74.3 months, the 5-year OS rate was 78.3% in the UFT/LV group and 79.1% in the SOX group (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76-1.24; p = 0.8175). The 5-year DFS rate was 55.2% in the UFT/LV group and 58.1% in the SOX group (HR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.76-1.11; p = 0.3973). In an exploratory analysis, the 5-year OS rate in patients with T4 disease was 65.2% and 70.8% in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, respectively (HR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.56-1.17), and the 5-year DFS rate was 45.4% and 50.5% (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.65-1.19), respectively. Notably, in patients with T4N2b disease, the 5-year OS rate was 51.0% and 64.1% in the UFT/LV group and SOX group, (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.40-1.31) and the 5-year DFS rate was 31.1% and 37.2% (HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.50-1.31), respectively. Conclusions: In Japanese patients with high-risk stage III colon cancer, the 5-year OS rate was similar in the UFT/LV group and SOX group. However, the oxaliplatin-based regimen was suggested to be more effective for DFS and OS in patients with advanced disease, such as T4N2b. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-101073.

Final safety findings from a randomized phase III trial of capecitabine + oxaliplatin (XELOX) vs. bolus 5-FU/LV as adjuvant therapy for patients (pts) with stage III colon cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3569-3569 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. J. Schmoll ◽  
J. Tabernero ◽  
M. Nowacki ◽  
J. Maroun ◽  
T. Price ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Grade 3

3569 Background: Adjuvant capecitabine results in at least equivalent disease-free survival (DFS) to i.v. bolus 5-FU/LV in stage III colon cancer [Twelves et al. 2005]. Early phase III data in 1st-line metastatic colorectal cancer suggest that XELOX is as safe as oxaliplatin + infusional 5-FU ± LV [Sastre et al. 2005; Ducreux et al. 2005]. The XELOXA study compared safety and efficacy of XELOX vs. bolus 5-FU/LV (the standard regimen at study start) as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. Methods: Pts with resected disease were randomized to receive either XELOX (capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid d1–14 + oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1, q3w for 8 cycles) or i.v. bolus 5-FU/LV (Mayo Clinic, LV 20 mg/m2 + 5-FU 425 mg/m2 d1–5, q4w for 6 cycles; or Roswell Park [RP], LV 500 mg/m2 + 5-FU 500 mg/m2 d1, w1–6 in 8w cycles x4). Centers’ preferred 5-FU/LV regimen was selected at study start and used in all pts. Results: 1861/1886 pts randomized between Apr 03 and Oct 04 are evaluable for safety. The rate of related grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) was 54% for XELOX and 45% for 5-FU/LV ( table ). 60-day all cause mortality was 1.0% in both arms. Treatment-related death rate within 28 days from last dose was 0.7% for XELOX and 0.5% for 5-FU/LV. Conclusions: XELOX causes less myelosuppression and stomatitis but more skin toxicity than 5-FU/LV. The inclusion of oxaliplatin adds neurosensory toxicity. Cross-study comparison of grade 3/4 AEs in the current and MOSAIC trials suggests that XELOX safety is similar to FOLFOX4, with the advantage of an oral fluoropyrimidine-based regimen. Final safety data will be presented at the meeting, and efficacy data will be available in 2007. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document