Institutional variation in the thoroughness of pathologic assessment and pathologic complete response rates for locally advanced rectal cancers treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation.
696 Background: A pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy and surgical excision is associated with a better prognosis and guides the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. It is not known whether the thoroughness of pathologic assessment correlates with the finding of pCR. Methods: We introduce a surrogate measure for the thoroughness of pathologic assessment by taking the ratio of maximum residual tumor size and the number of cassettes prepared from the tumor: the Tumor Size to Cassette Ratio (TSCR). We retrospectively reviewed pathology reports from 259 patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer enrolled in a multicenter prospective clinical trial to determine whether TSCR is associated with pCR. Results: Of 247 included patients, 71 (29%) had a pCR. The pCR rate ranged from 0-45% and TSCR ranged from 0.0004 to 1.67 across the twelve trial sites. TSCR was significantly associated with pCR on univariable analysis. On multivariable analysis, TSCR remained significantly associated with pCR (odds ratio of 0.05; 95% CI 0.008-0.302) after adjusting for clinical stage, tumor size, distance from anal verge, radiation dose, and the number of neoadjuvant cycles of FOLFOX received. Conclusions: Pathologists tend to assess rectal cancer specimens with a pCR more thoroughly, but the thoroughness of pathologic assessment of residual tumor specimens varies between institutions. The thoroughness of pathologic assessment is associated with pCR. This raises the need for further standardization in the assessment of rectal cancer specimens after neoadjuvant chemoradiation.