A phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with GSL (GEM+TS-1+LV) for marginally resectable pancreatic cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS516-TPS516
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Sakamoto ◽  
Hiroyuki Isayama ◽  
Kei Saito ◽  
Junichi Arita ◽  
Yousuke Nakai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
The Impact

TPS516 Background: The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is under debate. In this context, a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for marginally resectable pancreatic cancer is undergoing since Jan 2014 (UMIN000012480). In this trial, we employed GSL regimen (Gemcitabine 1000mg/m2, TS-1 80mg/m2, LV 50mg) which have reported favorable results (33% of response rate, 93% of disease control rate and 16.6 months of overall survival) for unresectable pancreatic cancer (Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2014; 74:911). Methods: The subjects were marginally resectable, pathologically proven pancreatic cancer, which consists of borderline resectable because of arterial attachment (BR-A) and locally advanced or unresectable (LA, UR) with short-segment ( = / < 3cm) arterial abutment based on NCCN guideline 2015. At least two surgeons, two medical oncologists, and one radiologist joined a consensus meeting to decide the indication of NAC and evaluated the efficacy of NAC every month. Patients with CR, PR or SD for 2-6 months underwent curative surgery combined with dissection of the nerve plexus around major arteries. The primary endpoint was R0 resectional rate, and the secondary endpoints were resectional rate, response rate, adverse effect, surgical morbidity, mortality, operative time and hospital stay period. Twenty-four patients are going to be enrolled, and 23 patients have undergone enrollment of NAC at the time of submission of the present abstract. Clinical trial information: 000012480.

Neoadjuvant Phase II Trial of Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 435-441
Author(s):  
Kannan Thanikachalam ◽  
Vijay Damarla ◽  
Trevor Seixas ◽  
Irina Dobrosotskaya ◽  
Ira Wollner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Final results of JASPAC05: Phase II trial of neoadjuvant S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy followed by surgery in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4127-4127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Takahashi ◽  
Izumi Ohno ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Masaru Konishi ◽  
Tatsushi Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Concurrent Radiotherapy

4127 Background: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is frequently associated with positive surgical margins and a poor prognosis when treated with upfront surgery. This study was designed to assess whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S-1 increases the R0 resection rate. Methods: This was a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study. Patients with BRPC received S-1 (40 mg/m2 bid) and concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) before surgery if they fulfilled any of the following: (1) bilateral impingement of the superior mesenteric vein or portal vein; and (2) tumor contact ≤180° with the superior mesenteric artery, common hepatic artery, or celiac axis. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate in BRPC confirmed by central review. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RECISTv1.1), pathological response rate, surgical morbidity (Clavien–Dindo classification), and toxicity (CTCAEv4.0). At least 40 patients were required, with one-sided α = 0.05 and β = 0.05, with an expected and threshold value for the primary endpoint of 30% and 10%. Results: Fifty-two patients were eligible, of whom 41 had BRPC by central review. CRT was completed in 50 (96%) patients and was well tolerated. The rate of grade 3/4 toxicity with CRT was 43%. The R0 resection rate was 52% (95% CI, 37.6%–66.0%) in 52 eligible patients and 63% (95% CI, 46.9%–77.9%) in 41 patients with BRPC. The radiological response rate was 5.8%, while destruction of > 50% of tumor cells was shown microscopically in 32% of patients. Postoperative grade III/IV adverse events were observed in 7.5% of operated patients. Among the 52 eligible patients, the 2-year OS rate, median OS, and median PFS were 51%, 25.8 mo, and 6.7 mo. Of the 41 patients with BRPC, the 2-year OS rate, median OS, and median PFS were 58%, 30.8 mo, and 10.4 mo. Conclusions: S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy appear to be feasible and effective at increasing the R0 resection rate with encouraging survival rates in BRPC. A phase II/III trial evaluating this treatment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02459652.

Phase II trial of S-1 combined with oxaliplatin (SOX) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 122-122
Author(s):  
L. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

122 Background: Previous phase II trial with combination therapy of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) demonstrated high response rate and well tolerability in patients with untreated advanced gastric cancer. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Methods: Eligibility criteria included a histologically proven AGC with stage IIIb, IIIc (AJCC 7th edition), at least 1 measurable lesion, no prior chemotherapy, ECOG 0∼2, adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function. Enrolled patients were staged by EUS and CT. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 3-4 cycles of oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2) on day 1 and S-1 (80 mg/m2/day) for 14 days with 7 days rest. After chemotherapy, the patients underwent surgery. Results: From Dec 2009 to Sep 2010, 35 patients (IIIb; 19pts, IIIc; 16pts) were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 54.6 years (range; 20-72 y). All patients were available for evaluating the clinical responese and adverse events. The overall response rate was 68.5% (1CR, 23 PR, 9 SD, 2 PD). 32 patients underwent surgical resection. Of them, 27 patients underwent standard D2 surgery and 5 patients had palliative surgery. 25 patients had R0 resection. Postoperative pathological examination showed that most of the surgical patients were in T4a stage. According to Lauren classification, 71.9% patiens (23/32pts) were diffuse type, SOX showed higher respons rate (1CR, 20 PR, 2 SD, RR: 91.3%) among these patients. Major grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were anemia (5.7%), neutropenia (5.7%) and liver dysfunction (8.6%) and non-hematological toxicities were anorexia (5.7%) and vomiting (11.4%). But most of the adverse events were managable. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) showed high response rate and and R0 resection rate for locally advanced GC, especially for diffuse type patients. All the patients did not have severe toxicity during the process of chemotherapy. This is the preliminary results, and the survival benefit in locally advanced GC patients that respond to SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy needs to be addressed by a randomized-controlled trial. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and intraoperative electron irradiation for locally unresectable/borderline resectable pancreas adenocarcinoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 327-327
Author(s):  
Jonathan Ben Ashman ◽  
Adyr A Moss ◽  
Matthew D. Callister ◽  
Kunam S Reddy ◽  
David C Mulligan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Electron Irradiation ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Pancreas Adenocarcinoma ◽  
The Impact

327 Background: The use of preoperative therapy for pancreatic cancer remains controversial. This study reviews our experience using neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgery with intraoperative electron irradiation (IOERT) for patients with borderline resectable (BR) or unresectable (UR) tumors. Methods: A retrospective review identified 48 patients (pts) with primary BR/UR pancreas adenocarcinoma treated with preop CRT with intent to proceed to curative surgery with IOERT. Seventeen patients did not undergo attempted resection and are excluded (disease progression, 12; medically inoperable, 3; declined surgery, 2). Thirty-one patients proceeded to resection attempt and are the subject of this analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed using log rank test for significance. Median follow up was 19 months (mo). Results: Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 11 pts, R1 in 5, and R2 or not resected (IOERT alone) in 15 patients. Twenty-six pts died (23 of disease, 2 unrelated causes, 1 uncertain). Median overall survival (OS) was 19 mo for all pts. Local progression was detected in only 5 patients (16%) while distant disease developed in 24 (77%). Resection status significantly correlated with OS; R0/R1 patients had a median survival of 23 mo vs. 10 mo for R2/unresected tumors (p = 0.002). Three-year OS was 35% vs. 0%, respectively. Survival was not influenced by tumor location, CA19-9 baseline or response, tumor size, or initial judgment of resectability (BR vs. UR). BR tumors were resectable after neoadjuvant therapy in 9 of 11 patients (R0, 8; R1, 1) while 8 of 20 initially UR tumors underwent resection (R0, 3; R1, 4; R2, 1). Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy combined with IOERT has the possibility to improve patient selection for surgical resection and to optimize local therapy. Although the prognosis for locally advanced pancreatic cancer remains poor, survival was superior among patients for whom R0 or R1 resection was achieved. Distant metastasis remained the dominant pattern of failure, and novel systemic agents are needed. Prospective evaluation of the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, CRT, and IOERT is warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document