Single-dose, four-way crossover, open-label, relative bioavailability (BA) studies of a novel formulation of abiraterone acetate (AA) versus the reference formulation under fasted conditions in healthy male subjects.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. e605-e605
Author(s):  
Ronald Goldwater ◽  
Azra Hussaini ◽  
Yuxin Zhang ◽  
Bill Bosch ◽  
Paul Nemeth

e605 Background: AA is approved for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The originator AA (OAA) formulation is poorly absorbed and exhibits large pharmacokinetic variability in abiraterone exposure in healthy subjects. AA fine particle (AAFP) is a proprietary formulation (utilizing SoluMatrix Fine-Particle Technology) that was designed to provide improved BA versus the OAA formulation. Methods: In Study 1, 20 subjects were randomized in a crossover design to single doses of AAFP 100, 200, or 400 mg or OAA 1000 mg. To further expand the AAFP dose range, 36 subjects were randomized in a crossover design to AAFP 125, 500, or 625 mg or OAA 1000 mg in Study 2. Both studies included a 7-day washout period prior to crossover. Results: AAFP 500 mg BA relative to OAA 1000 mg measured by the ratio of test-to-reference geometric means was AUC0-t 93.4% (90% CI: 85.3–102.4%), AUC0-∞ 91.0% (90% CI: 83.3–99.4%), and Cmax99.8% (90% CI: 86.3–115.5%). Dose proportionality was seen across all AAFP dose levels (see table). Between-subject variability for AAFP 500 and 625 mg was similar to OAA 1000 mg. No significant AAFP-related adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, or deaths occurred. Treatment-emergent AEs were mostly Grade 1. Conclusions: AAFP demonstrated improved BA and AAFP 500 mg was bioequivalent to OAA 1000 mg in healthy male volunteers under single dose and fasted conditions. AAFP showed dose proportionality across all doses studied (100–625 mg). Clinical trial information: NCT02737332. [Table: see text]

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16538-e16538
Author(s):  
Azra Hussaini ◽  
Anthony J. Olszanski ◽  
Cy Aaron Stein ◽  
Bill Bosch ◽  
Paul Nemeth

e16538 Background: AA is approved for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer when taken in combination with PN. The originator AA (OAA) formulation is poorly absorbed and exhibits large pharmacokinetic (PK) variability. AAFP is a proprietary formulation (utilizing SoluMatrix Fine-Particle Technology™) that was designed to provide improved BA. In a prior study in healthy subjects, AAFP 500 mg was established as bioequivalent to OAA 1000 mg when given in the fasted state. In this study, AAFP was evaluated in subjects in a fasted state with steady state (SS) MP, an alternative steroid to PN. Methods: Subjects aged 18–50 years were randomized in a crossover design to receive MP (4 mg BID) or PN (5 mg BID) for 12 days in Period 1. On Day 11 of Period 1, subjects given MP received a single dose of AAFP 500 mg (test) and subjects given PN received a single dose of OAA 1000 mg (reference). After a 2-week steroid washout period, subjects received the alternate treatments in Period 2. Results: There were no statistical differences with regard to abiraterone AUC ( P≥0.38) and Cmax ( P= 0.22) between AAFP 500 mg and OAA 1000 mg (Table). Geometric mean ratio (GMR), a measure of BE, was 95.9% (90% CI: 86.0–106.9%) for AUC0-∞, 99.2% (90% CI: 88.7–110.9%) for AUC0-t, and 116.8% (90% CI: 102.2–133.4%) for Cmax. GMR of AUC0-∞ and AUC0-t, fell within the 80–125% range for BE, and Cmax 90% CI was just outside the upper limit. The coefficient of variance (CV) for both AUC and Cmaxwas smaller for AAFP compared with OAA. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated. Conclusions: AAFP 500 mg with MP gave comparable exposure to OAA 1000 mg with PN with respect to Cmaxand AUC. Less drug exposure variability was observed with AAFP compared with OAA. Reduced PK variability could improve clinical outcomes and warrants further study. [Table: see text]


Xenobiotica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 379-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milin Acharya ◽  
Martha Gonzalez ◽  
Geert Mannens ◽  
Ronald De Vries ◽  
Christian Lopez ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117956112091012
Author(s):  
Jillian Chapas-Reed ◽  
Cy Stein ◽  
Nicholas Squittieri ◽  
Raoul Concepcion

Purpose: Abiraterone acetate is an androgen synthesis inhibitor used to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The therapeutic equivalence, pharmacokinetics, and safety of abiraterone acetate fine particle (AAFP) versus originator abiraterone acetate (OAA) were examined in a Phase-2 study; sufficient similarity was observed between the 2 treatments. This 1-year, open-label, extension study evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of AAFP. Patients and methods: This was an open-label, single-arm extension study. Patients who completed the 84-day, Phase-2, run-in study could enroll to receive 500 mg AAFP once daily and 4 mg methylprednisolone twice daily for up to 1 year. Safety was the primary endpoint, as assessed by adverse event monitoring throughout the study. Secondary efficacy endpoints included change from run-in study baseline levels of serum testosterone and prostate-specific antigen measured at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year. Results: Twenty patients enrolled, of whom 9 and 11 received prior AAFP and OAA in the run-in study, respectively. Both prior treatment groups maintained a significant decrease in serum testosterone from run-in baseline at all timepoints; mean change from run-in baseline ± standard deviation at 1 year of −6.24 ± 2.02 ( P = .0023) and −5.87 ± 3.64 ( P = .0026) ng/dL for the prior AAFP and OAA group, respectively. Change from run-in baseline in serum prostate-specific antigen was not significant. Most (84.0%) adverse events were Grade 1 or 2. Conclusion: No new safety signals were identified, and patients were able to successfully switch from OAA to AAFP with no impact.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document