Enrollment of esophago-gastric cancer patients in a clinical fast-track program and it’s affect on time to treatment and quality of life.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 180-180
Author(s):  
Atuhani S. Burnett ◽  
Jack Mouhanna ◽  
Jose Ramirez-Garcialuna ◽  
Emma Lee ◽  
Julie Breau ◽  
...  

180 Background: Esophago-gastric cancers are aggressive malignancies requiring numerous investigations to plan complex multi-modal therapy. The path from initial diagnosis to treatment can be associated with a long delay. This delay and complex patient trajectory may impact quality of life. Given the poor prognosis and highly symptomatic nature of upper GI cancer, a clear and timely access to treatment of crucial importance. We sought to determine the impact of a newly implemented streamlined and structure interdisciplinary pathway for newly diagnosed esophageal and gastric cancer on access times to treatment and quality of life (QoL). Methods: A streamlined pathway for patients referred to a high volume Upper GI Cancer clinic was generated with input from physicians, nutritionists, specialized nurses, and social workers. New diagnosis of esophageal or gastric cancer from 2014-16 were enrolled in this program and consenting patients completed serial QoL questionnaires (ESAS) at baseline, pre-treatment, 1 month post treatment. Dysphagia (DS) was quantified on a 5 point scale. Time intervals (days) were evaluated at various points between diagnosis and start of treatment (diagnosis, CT imaging, first visit with upper GI program, start of treatment). Data presented as median(IQR), * p < 0.05. Results: Of the 251 patients with Upper GI cancer, 153 (61%) consented to participate including 140 esophageal/EGJ and 13 gastric cancer patients. Clinical stage distribution was 17.9% I, 30.7% II, 42.6% III, 8.7% IV. Of the 82 Esoph/EGJ patients with completed QoL questionnaires, 15 (18.3%) patients had severe dysphagia (DS = 3-4) and were prioritized for treatment. Patients with severe dysphagia had reduced time from index endoscopy to treatment (29 (16.3-39.3) vs 43 (32.8-68.0)days)* and first Upper GI clinic to treatment (15 (8.0-23.0) vs 25 (21.0-36.0)*. ESAS surveys showed increased QoL for both patients with and without dysphagia from baseline to pre-treatment indicating that simply entry into the streamlined program improved QoL. Conclusions: Structured interdisciplinary investigative and treatment programs for upper GI cancers can expedite time to treatment and improve QoL.

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S1057-S1058
Author(s):  
H-B. Zhang ◽  
Y-J. Zhu ◽  
J.J. Mao ◽  
J-J. Peng ◽  
X-S. Chang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dzung Ngoc Thi Dang ◽  
Lan Ngoc Thi Nguyen ◽  
Nga Thi Dang ◽  
Huy Quang Dang ◽  
Thanh Van Ta

Background. Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in Vietnam. Research on health-related quality of life of Vietnamese gastric cancer patients is still in its infancy. Aim. To assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of GC patients using the 15D instrument. Materials and Method. 182 Vietnamese gastric cancer patients were selected to be interviewed and their HRQOL was assessed using the generic 15D questionnaire. Tables regarding history, disease characteristics, and HRQOL of participants were formulated according to genders using STATA 12.0. Results. The average age of the participants was 60.8 ± 11.6. The average time from diagnosis to the date of interview was 14.8 ± 8.4 months. The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) index score of gastric cancer patients using the 15D instrument was 0.92 ± 0.08, in which the “sexual activity” dimension had the lowest score of 0.66. Also, our study found several factors affecting HRQOL, including age, occupation, education, disease stage, treatment, and time from the date of diagnosis. Conclusion. The 15D instrument was a suitable tool to assess Vietnamese gastric cancer patients’ quality of life. Findings from the study suggest the importance of frequently measuring personal functioning and performance of GC patients as parts of QOL assessment during clinical examination. It also implies the needs for more focused policies on raising the overall quality of life of patients such as encouragement of periodical HQROL assessment and acknowledging HRQOL as a treatment/intervention goal besides the 5-year survival rate.


2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Aliakbar Hajaghamohammadi ◽  
Somayeh Ahmadi Gooraji ◽  
Ali Zargar

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients gives valuable information regarding the burden of disease, type of treatment and its side effects in studies on chronic diseases. In this study an attempt is made to predict the QoL of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.METHODS: In a cross sectional prospective study, data of 107 patients with GI cancers 58 male & 49 female with a mean age of 60.7±10.5 referred to a hospital from April 2009 to June 2015 were collected by using two standard questionnaires of EORTC-QLQ C30 and EORTC-QLQ-GINET 21. Data analysis was done using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and correlation test in soft wares of STATA and SPSS.16.RESULTS: Total QoL score was 50.7±24.6 in patients with gastrointestinal cancer which is almost optimal. Symptoms level was more in gastric cancer patients and their major complaints were constipation and diarrhea.  QoL of patients with GI cancers were more affected by the educational level and type of cancer (P<0.05).A high correlation of QoL was related to social and emotional domains (P<0.05). Mean score of QoL was more in males with colorectal cancer, educated and retired patients (P<0.05).CONCLUSION: the social and emotional support to patients with esophageal cancer and to reduce the level of symptoms in patients with gastric cancer due to complications of their diseases or treatment should be of consideration to improve their QoL.


Author(s):  
Edith A. Brutcher, RN, APRN-BC, AOCNP ◽  
Zhengjia Chen, PhD ◽  
Anqi Pan, MSPH Candidate ◽  
Tiffany Barrett, MS, RD, CSO, LD

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document