Randomized phase II study of second-line modified FOLFIRI with PARP inhibitor ABT-888 (Veliparib) (NSC-737664) versus FOLFIRI in metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC): SWOG S1513.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4014-4014 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Katherine A Guthrie ◽  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Elizabeth M. Swisher ◽  
Florencia Jalikis ◽  
...  

4014 Background: PC is characterized by DNA Damage Repair (DDR) deficiencies, including in BRCA1/2, ATM, and FANC genes. Given preclinical synergism between veliparib with irinotecan, safety and preliminary efficacy, we designed a randomized phase II study of mFOLFIRI (no 5-FU bolus) + veliparib vs FOLFIRI alone for 2nd line mPC patients (pts). Methods: Eligible pts had mPC, adequate organ function, ECOG PS 0-1, and 1 prior non-irinotecan systemic therapy.143 pts were to be randomized (1:1) to veliparib vs control. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). All pts had blood and tumor biopsies at baseline to assess germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations (integrated), and homologous recombination (HR) or DDR biomarkers (exploratory). Results: 123 pts were accrued between 09/2016 to 12/2017, and 108 were included in this analysis. 117 pts were biomarker evaluable: 109 blood/106 tumors. 11 cancers (9%) had HR deficiency (HRD), including 4 germline ( BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM) and 7 somatic mutations ( BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, CDK12). Additional 24 cancers (20%) had germline (n = 11, e.g., FANC, BLM, SLX4, CHEK2) or somatic mutations (n = 13, e.g., FANC, BLM, POLD1, RIF1, MSH2, MSH6) in other DNA repair genes, not classified as HRD. A planned interim futility analysis at 35% of expected PFS events determined the veliparib arm was unlikely to be superior to control. Most common grade 3/4 treatment related toxicities were neutropenia (33% vs 20%), fatigue (19% vs 4%), and nausea (11% vs 4%), for veliparib vs control. Treatment exposure was similar for veliparib vs control: median 4 cycles (range 1-31 vs 1-32). Median OS was 5.1 vs 5.9 mos (HR 1.3, 95%CI 0.9-2.0, p = 0.21), and median PFS was 2.1 vs 2.9 mos (HR 1.5, 95%CI 1.0-2.2, p = 0.05) for veliparib vs control arms, respectively. Correlations of gene mutations and signatures with efficacy outcomes will be presented. Conclusions: Nearly 30% of mPC pts had DNA repair gene abnormalities, including 9% with HRD. Veliparib increased toxicity and did not improve OS when added to mFOLFIRI in biomarker unselected pts. BRCA1/2 and DDR biomarkers will be correlated with efficacy to inform patient selection for future PARP inhibitor clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02890355.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4147-TPS4147
Author(s):  
E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Shannon McDonough ◽  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Elizabeth M. Swisher ◽  
Michael J. Pishvaian ◽  
...  

TPS4147 Background: PC is characterized by multiple DNA repair defects, including in BRCA1/ 2, and other homologous recombination (HR) genes such as FANC, ATM, ATR (Waddell N, Nature 2015). Folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/ irinotecan (FOLFIRI) is a 2nd line therapy option in mPC, but overall survival (OS) averages only 6 mos (Yoo C, Br J Cancer 2009). It is known that PARP facilitates repair from topoisomerase 1-associated DNA damage, and that preclinically PARP inhibitors (PARPi) increase DNA breaks from camptothecins, resulting in synergistic antitumor effects (Smith LM, Clin Cancer Res 2005, Davidson D, Invest New Drugs 2013). PARPi are active in mPC harboring BRCA1/2 mutations. Given the preclinical synergism between ABT-888 with irinotecan, and the safety and preliminary efficacy noted in a phase I trial (Berlin J, J Clin Oncol 2014; abstr 2574), we designed a randomized phase II study of mFOLFIRI /ABT-888 vs FOLFIRI alone for 2nd line mPC patients (pts). Blood and tumor samples are collected at baseline to retrospectively analyze biomarkers related to DNA repair capacity, including the HRD assay and BROCA-HR, a targeted multi-gene sequencing to detect alterations within the Fanconi Anemia-BRCA (HR), non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), and DNA mismatch repair pathways, and correlate with efficacy. Methods: Phase II study in 143 pts randomized (1:1) to mFOLFIRI/ABT-888 or FOLFIRI. For optimal PARP inhibition, ABT-888 is dosed Days (D) 1-7 and mFOLFIRI (no 5-FU bolus) D3-5 in 14D-cycles. In the control arm, FOLFIRI is dosed D1-3 in 14D-cycles. Primary endpoint: compare OS between treatment arms; secondary endpoints: safety, progression-free survival, response rates; translational: correlate germline/somatic BRCA1/2 mutations, and other DNA repair biomarkers with efficacy in each arm. Standard eligibility criteria apply. Assuming that the addition of ABT-888 will increase OS from 6 to 9 mos, 128 eligible pts (143 pts total) are required, based on a one-sided type 1 error of 10%, and 80% power. Kaplan-Meier methodology will be used to estimate median OS for each treatment arm. This study is open to accrual (NCT02890355). Clinical trial information: NCT02890355.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5095-TPS5095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Christopher Markowski ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Rana Sullivan ◽  
Michael Haffner ◽  
Angelo M De Marzo ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Schweizer ◽  
Smruthy Sivakumar ◽  
Hanna Tukachinsky ◽  
Ilsa Coleman ◽  
Navonil De Sarkar ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. clincanres.1789.2021
Author(s):  
E. Gabriela Chiorean ◽  
Katherine A Guthrie ◽  
Philip A Philip ◽  
Elizabeth M. Swisher ◽  
Florencia Jalikis ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. e79-e80
Author(s):  
Andrew Spencer ◽  
Malarmathy Ramachandran ◽  
Kawa choi ◽  
jay hocking ◽  
Daniela Klarica ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. S23
Author(s):  
Rosalind Eeles ◽  
Daniel Leongamornlert ◽  
Edward Saunders ◽  
Sarah Wakerell ◽  
Ian Whitmore ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document